http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10649 <pre> +1 </pre> Stephen John Smoogen 2012-05-24T23:11:11 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10648 <pre>Thank you all for your assistance. Both of these items is what I was looking for. Thank you for your time and have a great day! On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi &lt;kevin-+bl/7iUgRMUAvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Jeremy Davis 2012-05-24T22:21:20 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10647 <pre>On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:40 -0600 Jeremy Davis &lt;jdavis4102-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: As noted, the buildsys list might be better. ;) Yes, we use bugzilla to review packages, then we have a script that takes the approved packages list and processes the new package requests from it. It's available at: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fedora-infrastructure.git;a=blob;f=scripts/process-git-requests/process-git-requests;h=37ebbc9c6b1fec0338d082e077bef8856fc1dd21;hb=29e87a22fac82df08e7b31563be5b4bca01f821d It calls our package database and then goes to the packages machine and creates the git repo with the needed branches. Hope that helps some. kevin _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T22:06:00 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10646 <pre>+1 -Toshio _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Toshio Kuratomi 2012-05-24T22:02:42 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10645 <pre>I'd like to revert puppet commits: 55103ec6ce3a80234391229f6b10e220fa13e72d 5b131d0e489f5349d5cef6a8e0ffdc2febda0441 This reverts review-stats.py to the version that we had before monday, which was working with the old python-bugzilla (which we have already reverted to). I've tested it locally and it does only make 6 bugzilla calls when used with the python-bugzilla version we have reverted to, so we shouldn't be causing undue load on bugzilla. I'd also like to: diff --git a/modules/review-stats/manifests/init.pp b/modules/review-stats/manifests/init.pp index 9a016a5..0376a77 100644 --- a/modules/review-stats/manifests/init.pp +++ b/modules/review-stats/manifests/init.pp &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -57,7 +57,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; class review-stats::build inherits review-stats { command =&gt; "/usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/pyGetReviewByFlags.py -t /usr/local/share/review-stats -d user =&gt; "apache", minute =&gt; [ 0, 30 ], - ensure =&gt; "absent", + ensure =&gt; "present", } } to re-enable it. +1s</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T21:45:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10644 <pre> +1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Ricky Elrod 2012-05-24T21:18:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10643 <pre>On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:11:41 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi &lt;a.badger-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: Here's your +1 mallet of bugzilla wack a moling. :) kevin -- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T21:15:00 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10642 <pre>The change below broke bugz.fedoraproject.org. Backing out the change to the unprivileged user but leaving the privileged user change in appears to fix things (although we haven't tested everything as stg doesn't talk to bugzilla as much as production does.) Since bugz.fedoraproject.org is fairly visible, I'd like to apply the following hotfix to fix that. I'll alert the cvsadmin to let me know if this re-breaks processing of scmadmin requests. diff --git a/modules/hotfix/files/pkgdb/utils.py b/modules/hotfix/files/pkgdb/utils.py index 8c121c5..ef0001b 100644 --- a/modules/hotfix/files/pkgdb/utils.py +++ b/modules/hotfix/files/pkgdb/utils.py &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -51,7 +51,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; from cherrypy import request from sqlalchemy import select, and_ from sqlalchemy.exceptions import DataError -from bugzilla import RHBugzilla3 +from bugzilla import RHBugzilla3, Bugzilla import memcache # The Fedora Account System Module &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -218,7 +218,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; def get_unprivileged_bz(): bz_server = config.get('bugzilla.queryurl', config.ge</pre> Toshio Kuratomi 2012-05-24T21:11:41 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10641 <pre> +1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Ricky Elrod 2012-05-24T19:37:13 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10640 <pre>+1. Note that before we switch to this, we should also make sure monitoring and backups are in place. kevin _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T19:35:49 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10639 <pre>On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:28:22 +0000 skvidal&lt; at &gt;fedoraproject.org wrote: Need +1's to this patch, please -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> seth vidal 2012-05-24T19:27:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10638 <pre>From: Seth Vidal &lt;skvidal&lt; at &gt;fedoraproject.org&gt; --- manifests/nodes/db-fas01.phx2.fedoraproject.org | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ modules/bind/files/master/126.5.10.in-addr.arpa | 4 ++-- modules/bind/files/master/phx2.fedoraproject.org | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 manifests/nodes/db-fas01.phx2.fedoraproject.org diff --git a/manifests/nodes/db-fas01.phx2.fedoraproject.org b/manifests/nodes/db-fas01.phx2.fedoraproject.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac90bf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/manifests/nodes/db-fas01.phx2.fedoraproject.org &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -0,0 +1,18 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; +node db01-fas.phx2.fedoraproject.org { + $bacula5 = "true" + # re-enable this once we have db's setup. + # $backup_db_often = true + include phx + include db + include appDB-el6 + collectd::collectd { 'log02': } + collectd::postgres { 'postgres': + databases =&gt; ['fas'] + } + + # Workaround for bug 768055 + semanage_fcontext { '/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_disk': + </pre> skvidal-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-24T19:28:22 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10637 <pre>============================================ #fedora-meeting: Infrastructure (2012-05-24) ============================================ Meeting started by nirik at 18:01:02 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-24/infrastructure.2012-05-24-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Robot Roll Call (nirik, 18:01:02) * New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks. (nirik, 18:03:37) * bugzilla and database issues this week (nirik, 18:08:33) * ACTION: nirik to file outage tickets for these two things so we have record of them. (nirik, 18:20:26) * plan to move fas db to it's own db server. (nirik, 18:20:40) * adjust freeze document (nirik, 18:20:51) * two factor auth status (nirik, 18:23:09) * Fedora 17 Release tickets (nirik, 18:24:25) * release 2012-05-29 (nirik, 18:24:45) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4963 (nirik, 18:30:08) * Applications status / discussion (nirik, 18:31:57) * LINK: http://</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T19:04:05 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10636 <pre>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:22:55 -0400 Ricky Elrod &lt;codeblock&lt; at &gt;elrod.me&gt; wrote: +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk++fmQACgkQkSxm47BaWfdS3QCggUV3ixPWm0LdH2zOIvM3YJtv n1YAoL6XswrCwUXMZFu7LGWlL8J+Lsyy =xtbE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Dennis Gilmore 2012-05-24T18:30:54 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10635 <pre> +1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Ricky Elrod 2012-05-24T18:22:55 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10634 <pre>This will be a first step to migrate to a private fas postgres instance. In order to free up mem and procs I would like to shutdown search01-dev on virthost05 and bring up db-fas01 on there. The goal would be a private postgres db server for fas alone. I will be kickstarting a vm on virthost05 and then adding entries to puppet/dns to accommodate this. I need some +1's to break the freeze to make this happen. thanks, -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> seth vidal 2012-05-24T18:15:27 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10633 <pre>+1 here as well. kevin _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-24T15:23:18 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10632 <pre>On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:01:28 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi &lt;a.badger-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: +1 -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> seth vidal 2012-05-24T15:06:08 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10631 <pre>As part of two situations I've pushed out a hotfix to pkgdb and would like two +1's for the change. The situations: * Continuing work to get our apps working with the old python-bugzilla package from yesterday's problems between infrastructure and bugzilla * Unknown causes of downtime for the fas servers. We're currently trying to determine what's causing the second situation to recur ~ every two hours. As part of that we're trying to fix anything that is out of the ordinary. So I've pushed this fix out and verified it works with the reporter. If I could get two +1's for after the fact application during change freeze, that would be great. The change: When PackageDB makes changes to who owns a package or creates a new package it needs to login to bugzilla and find out if the new owner has a bugzilla account. Those connections were failing for the same reason as fas's export-bugzilla was failing yesterday: the older version of python-bugzilla does not know how to get this information out of the new ve</pre> Toshio Kuratomi 2012-05-24T15:01:28 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10630 <pre>I am looking forward to introduce myself in the weekly meeting :) Ivan Garcia On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:29 +0000, infrastructure-request&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure&lt; at &gt;lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</pre> cyberworm 2012-05-24T02:09:00 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure/10629 <pre>The infrastructure team will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow, 2012-05-24 at 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on the freenode network. Suggested topics: #topic New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks. If any new folks want to give a quick one line bio or any apprentices would like to ask general questions, they can do so here. #topic two factor auth status #topic Fedora 17 Release tickets #topic Applications status / discussion Check in on status of our applications: pkgdb, fas, bodhi, koji, community, voting, tagger, packager, dpsearch, etc. If there's new releases, bugs we need to work around or things to note. #topic Upcoming Tasks/Items #info 2012-05-08 to 2012-05-29 FINAL FREEZE #info 2012-05-29 - F17 release #info 2012-06-01 - nag fi-apprentices. #info 2011-06-03 - gitweb-cache removal day. #info 2012-06-04 - class B reboots? #info 2012-06-05 - class A reboots? #info 2012-06-08 OOW: osuosl01.fedoraproject.org #info 2012-06-17 OOW: sign-vault02.phx2.fedoraproject.org #info 2012-06-2</pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-23T23:52:13 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.infrastructure