<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general">
    <title>gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431581"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431580"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431579"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431578"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431577"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431576"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431575"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431574"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431573"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431572"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431571"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431570"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431569"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431568"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431567"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431566"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431565"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431564"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431563"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431562"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431581">
    <title>Re: Bootable distro on Flash - Howto?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431581</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Useful to know. I went to unetbootin because I didn't have luck with Live-CD, 
but that was long enough ago that major improvements to either are likely.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bill Davidsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T15:56:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431580">
    <title>Re: Device Drivers in Fedora 18</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431580</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Good that it works for you. I have installed on several laptops which need 
"nomodeset" to come up, and don't really work in a stable manner with the 
nouveau driver. Perhaps the desktop support is better, using different chipsets. 
Use what works, clearly.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bill Davidsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T15:50:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431579">
    <title>Re: Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431579</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I added the spec/patch changes for 0.9.9 to the above repo.  A 'git pull' 
should bring them in for the F17, F18, and F19 branches.  -A

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Messina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T15:44:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431578">
    <title>Re: Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431578</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

I keep my own local RPM you're welcome to use:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/HandBrake-0.9.9-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm


I briefly tried building from source, but didn't get very far (and no, it


If you want to keep it updated yourself you can use my SRPM as well:

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/HandBrake-0.9.9-1.fc18.src.rpm

Richard
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T13:18:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431577">
    <title>Re: Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431577</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
It would help if I opened up the firewall on the right port...  Give it 
another go.  -A

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Messina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T12:44:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431576">
    <title>Re: Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431576</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
git clone git://messinet.com/rpms/handbrake.git
Cloning into 'handbrake'...
fatal: unable to connect to messinet.com:
messinet.com[0: 50.196.241.75]: errno=No route to host
messinet.com[1: 2001:470:c1dc:7779:d6ae:52ff:feb9:4173]: errno=Network is 
unreachable


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Neal Becker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T12:13:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431575">
    <title>Re: Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431575</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
You can use the spec I have here:
git clone git://messinet.com/rpms/handbrake.git

Just add the sources and you should be good to build.  -A

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Messina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T12:04:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431574">
    <title>Handbrake for f18 x86_64?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431574</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Any place to find an rpm (or srpm) for recent Handbrake (0.9.9)?

I briefly tried building from source, but didn't get very far (and no, it 
doesn't look like a problem with my not installing the deps).

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Neal Becker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T11:46:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431573">
    <title>Re: ICMPv6 Neighbour Solication request is not answered by linux whenIPv6 address is assigned via Netlink code.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431573</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Also please don't top post ... and check my questions over on the CentOS
mailing lists (kevin? ... same exact email and source IP address... )
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>James Hogarth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T11:46:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431572">
    <title>Re: ICMPv6 Neighbour Solication request is not answered by linux whenIPv6 address is assigned via Netlink code.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431572</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sorry for cross post, it was a general problem seen on multiple OS i.e.
CentOS and Fedora.




On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, James Hogarth &amp;lt;james.hogarth&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote:

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Norah Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T11:34:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431571">
    <title>Re: ICMPv6 Neighbour Solication request is not answered by linux whenIPv6 address is assigned via Netlink code.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431571</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Please do not cross post to multiple mailing lists... Is this a CentOS,
Fedora or Ubuntu platform you are seeing this on? They all have different
kernels and may have different behaviours potentially as a result.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>James Hogarth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T10:52:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431570">
    <title>RE: What's the real-world usage of a TPM module?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431570</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;It should not be much different from storing LUKS-key-files on a smartcard.

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Digimer
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: What's the real-world usage of a TPM module?

On 05/20/2013 03:18 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:

I find this interesting. I wounder if it can be used to store the 
passphrase for LUKS encrypted partitions... Anyone on Fedora tried this?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>J.Witvliet&lt; at &gt;mindef.nl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T08:40:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431569">
    <title>F19 - How to use alias network interface?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431569</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?

My actual setup (without alias):
[root&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0  network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
[root&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0
TYPE=Ethernet
#BOOTPROTO=dhcp
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=enp4s0
UUID=4fd3476d-2423-4c26-99f9-28b5f6d18b05
ONBOOT=yes
HWADDR=00:08:54:41:46:01
PEERDNS=yes
PEERROUTES=yes
IPADDR=172.16.0.1
PREFIX=16
[root&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
DOMAIN="central.ucv.ro"
IPV6_PEERDNS="yes"
IPV6INIT="yes"
UUID="df0a5629-9f3f-4c85-a5c0-ad72e8bbbbf6"
IPADDR0="193.x.y.130"
DNS1="193.x.y.254"
PREFIX0="26"
DEFROUTE="yes"
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="yes"
HWADDR="00:25:22:F9:71:3D"
BOOTPROTO="none"
IPV6_DEFROUTE="yes"
GATEWAY0="193.x.y.129"
IPV6_AUTOCONF="yes"
IPV6_F&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Cristian Sava</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T07:03:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431568">
    <title>Re: Password problem</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431568</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Wrong.  You use ^Alt-FN, not just ^FN.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Joe Zeff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T06:32:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431567">
    <title>ICMPv6 Neighbour Solication request is not answered by linux whenIPv6 address is assigned via Netlink code.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431567</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi, 

I have a process which is running as a linux service and assigns IP addresses using netlink to configued interface in linux.
For IPv4 addresses i do not see any issue with this assignment.

When i try to assign an IPv6 address, the address gets assigned successfully to the interface, but the Neighbour Solication request received for that address is not responded with and hence ping6 from a different machine doesn't work.

When i take the same netlink code and run it in a sample program the address gets assigned and the Neighbour solicitation is responded with a advertisement and hence ping6 works.

IP assigned by the program : 7000::15/32
IP on client machine from where ping6 is done : 7000::17/32.

Bot machines are connected to same Layer-2 switch.

I have flushed the ip6tables on both the machines just to rule out any firewall issues.

Thanks,
Norah Jones


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Norah Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T06:10:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431566">
    <title>Re: Password problem</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431566</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;CTRL+F2
Login as root
passwd user 'your_new_pass'
type it again 'your_new_pass'

Once it says password successfully changed type in exit then CTRL+F1
to go back to the GUI and login as usual

The DM (display manager) has nothing to do with your password as user

Regards
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Edik Landaveri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T03:19:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431565">
    <title>[SOLVED] Re: Password problem</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431565</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
   Yup that did it. Wonder why the alleged recovery mode kernel in 19 
isn't ? I will ask on
the test list.

Thanks for the help.




&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank McCormick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T01:31:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431564">
    <title>Re: Password problem</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431564</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Boot into single user mode

As root, change your regular account's password

passwd accountname

Booting into single user mode:
http://www.fedora.itopstube.com/2011/07/entering-single-user-mode-at-grub.html


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Steven Stern</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T01:14:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431563">
    <title>Password problem</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431563</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Just installed Fedora 19 ( I know questions are supposed to go to that 
list, but this is more of a
general thing).

I was having a lot of problems with the GDM login manager so I disabled 
it and installed
lightdm.

Everything was working fine UNTIL I tried to change my password to 
something I could
remember - the steup forces you to pick one which can't be easily broken.

Now the login manager tells me both the old and new passwords are wrong. 
So basically I can't get into
the system. I tried the recovery kernel but it simply takes me to the 
login manager, unlike the recovery options
on my Fedora 17 and 18 systems.

Can someone offer a suggestion ( I'm writing this in my Debian system)

Thanks

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank McCormick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T01:02:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431562">
    <title>Re: how to make user account partially bi-lingual?  [CLOSED]</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431562</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

 all LibreOffice applications, internet e-mail (Yahoo mail, gmail, etc.), etc.

When diagnosing and solving this started involving screen captures, I decided to take this off-line with Ed Greshko.    With a lot of
 excellent help from Ed, everything I believe I want or need to do, I can now do somehow.  It would take a lot to spell it all out.  I'll try to summarize.  I'll keep referring to Chinese (meaning "simplified" Chinese) here, but I suspect this applies to some other languages as well.


* It may be necessary to download RPMs for Chinese.  You'll need Chinese fonts and "ibus" (the tool needed for input of Chinese characters).
* In the chosen desktop's customization GUI, a user can select more than one language.  He should make sure English is the display language.  But the list of available languages must include Chinese.
* The "ibus" tool should be chosen for input of Chinese.  "ibus" is configurable.
* UTF-8 is the preferred encoding for text in files.
* Make sure the encoding in termin&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>William Mattison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T23:45:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431561">
    <title>Re: Ok, so where do mysql bugs go, these days?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/431561</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Can you go to mysql.com, type "mysql bugreport" in the search box on the  
top, and see what you find.

I wouldn't expect a need to use Google to figure out where to report mysql  
bugs, when mysql's home page, presumably, exists, and that's where one would  
logically expect to look, first. Maybe if I didn't know what mysql's  
homepage was, perhaps, then I can understand using Google. But not when,  
allegedly, mysql has a home page that I can look at.

By comparison, if I go to www.postgresql.org, I immediately see a fscking  
"Report a Bug" link right on the home page. Was that too hard?

The closest thing on www.mysql.com is the "Contact Us" link. That leads to  
Oracle's sales department. An even tinier link, at the bottom, called  
"Support" leads to a gateway for paid Oracle technical support.

And even if one would like to make an argument that using Google would not  
be unreasonable here, it's still reasonable to expect that the best place to  
find the relevant link would be the home page, but &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Varshavchik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T23:34:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
