<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai">
    <title>gmane.linux.debian.fai</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9552"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9551"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9550"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9549"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9548"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9547"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9546"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9545"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9544"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9543"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9542"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9541"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9540"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9539"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9538"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9537"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9536"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9535"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9534"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9533"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9552">
    <title>Re: Fai 4.0.1 Compatible with Debian Lenny?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9552</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Thomas and Toomas: Thanks! Will try it out with lenny with a test 
machine. Also received the following from &amp;lt;blacky_tn&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fluffbunny.de&amp;gt; to 
&amp;lt;linux-fai&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;uni-koeln.de&amp;gt; but didn't get posted? Quote:

"If you know what you're doing then it's totally possible to have for 
instance an outdated SuSE Linux as the pxe/samba/nfs/dhcp server, which 
tells the clients to boot a Debian Sid nfsroot, which happily installs 
Ubuntu or RedHat distributions. Yes, it's that flexible. Why would 
someone do such an insane thing? Don't look at me to closely or I might 
have to hurt you. :p

"A1: I don't know.
A2: If you decide to run with differing versions between fai-server, 
fai-nfsroot and install client then you need to get familiar with the 
fai configspace hooks. At least in fai 3.x there was a strong assumption 
that all three software components run on the same OS and some files 
(e.g. /etc/apt/sources.list) were copied from the nfsroot to the install 
client and could wreak havok if this assumptions was violated. A3: I 
d&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>n43w79</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T23:17:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9551">
    <title>Re: Fai 4.0.1 Compatible with Debian Lenny?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9551</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I have deleted the original question, thus may miss the target, but I
think the newest FAI can co-operate with the lenny pxe, nfs and dhcp
servers just fine. As long as the FAIhost itself is running a newer
Debian release, you should not have a need to upgrade the rest of your
infrastructure yet.

Toomas


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Toomas Tamm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T15:17:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9550">
    <title>Re: Fai 4.0.1 Compatible with Debian Lenny?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9550</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
    &amp;gt; Found the latest fai .deb packages here:
    &amp;gt; http://cdn.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fai/fai-server_4.0.1_all.deb
    &amp;gt; http://cdn.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fai/fai-doc_4.0.1_all.deb
    &amp;gt; Our internal pxe/samba/nfs/dhcp server is still running lenny.
    &amp;gt; Q1. Is the .deb packages above compatible with lenny?
No.

    &amp;gt; Q3. Are there any documentation or howto on this subject?
There's the wiki and the FAI guide and a lot of other documentation at
http://fai-project.org/otherdocs/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Lange</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T13:44:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9549">
    <title>Re: Install config help needed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9549</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Your nfsroot may not have the required initramfs packages. So that would
be a start. (I have a running Ubuntu 10.04 nfsroot, so I know at least
this one is fine.) The package was renamed in between.

Ubuntu 10.04LTS: initramfs-tools
Ubuntu 12.04LTS: live-boot-initramfs-tools

Maybe this is a follow-up error on not having aptitude in your nfsroot,
maybe it's not.

(Don't forget to update the initramfs and copy the new initrd to your
tftp-server after installing the package. But you probably already thought
about that. ;) )


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Neumann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T12:44:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9548">
    <title>Re: Install config help needed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9548</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
While in principle FAI should work under Ubuntu, I would recommend
Debian stable for the learning stage. That is the environment FAI is
primarily targeted for, and seems to have the largest user base as well.

Once you have mastered installing a basic Debian system with FAI (off a
Debian faiserver), you can consider switching the installation target to
Ubuntu, or trying an Ubuntu FAI server, or eventually both.

It is good to keep the working Debian FAI server available for
reference, so that you can compare your failing installations with
successful ones, and spot differences. If physical hosts are scarce, the
FAI server can be transfered to a virtual machine, but again, for
learning I would start with physical host in order to avoid initial
problems with networking setup.

Hoping this helps,

Toomas Tamm


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Toomas Tamm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T07:05:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9547">
    <title>Re: Install config help needed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9547</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Op 25-5-2012 2:08, Steve B. schreef:

Hi Steve,

Are you using aptitude or apt-get to create your NFS root (which is what 
you do with fai-setup)? When you install FAI quickstart, it will come 
with examples that default to aptitude. But aptitude is not installed by 
default anymore in Ubuntu.

You have two options:
One option would be to rewrite the examples to use apt-get. To do this, 
you open /etc/fai/NFSROOT and find the lines that start with 'PACKAGES 
aptitude'. You should replace the word 'aptitude' with 'install'.
Another option would be to install aptitude. ('sudo apt-get install 
aptitude') This is the option I chose.

Judging from the errors you get, I assume you've already installed 
aptitude. Ubuntu 12.04 ships with aptitude 0.6.6-1ubuntu1, and that 
version contains a bug. This is fixed in aptitude 0.6.7-1.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/975793

I've installed aptitude 0.6.7-1 manually by manually downloading from 
the Ubuntu repositories (I think). But now I can't see&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jurrie Overgoor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T06:59:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9546">
    <title>Install config help needed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9546</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Been trying for a week to get FAI to work on a Ubuntu 12.04 with no
success.   I have been testing both a physical and virtual target and same
results. I have FAI 3.4.8 installed.

I get a couple errors running fai-setup that are numeric 65280 but can't
find a description of that error.  It occurs after text.. "Writing Extended
State information.. , Reading task description.... after that a bunch of
configure errors.  The ends with ERROR: live-initranfs was not installed.


Then if I try to do and install pxe loads then a lot of text flies by and
then see....
Begin: Loading essential drivers ... done
Begin: Running /scripts/init-premount ... done
Begin: Mount root file system ... /init: .: line 249: can't open
'scripts/live'

Then a stack dump with what I see others report Kernel panic - not syncing:
Attempt to kill init!


So I've been reading everything I can and purged and re-installed and no
difference.

Can you point to some info or tell me what to fix.

Would switching to a different distro help like D&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Steve B.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T00:08:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9545">
    <title>Fai 4.0.1 Compatible with Debian Lenny?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9545</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
Found the latest fai .deb packages here:
http://cdn.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fai/fai-server_4.0.1_all.deb
http://cdn.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fai/fai-doc_4.0.1_all.deb
Our internal pxe/samba/nfs/dhcp server is still running lenny.
Q1. Is the .deb packages above compatible with lenny?
Q2. If so, what are the gotchas installing the above packages into 
debian lenny?
Q3. Are there any documentation or howto on this subject?
Thanks!
Kwon

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>n43w79</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T03:28:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9544">
    <title>Re: whole disk RAID partitioned directly, with Grub BIOS partition</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9544</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;[...] 

"mdcreateopts" can be used in a disk_config: 
raid1       -       sdc1,sdd1       -       -       mdcreateopts="--metadata=0.9"


for this it may make sense to use disklabel:gpt-bios.  it creates an
add'l partition for bios_grub.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>andrew bezella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T21:24:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9543">
    <title>Re: whole disk RAID partitioned directly, with Grub BIOS partition</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9543</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;How about something like


# example of new config file for setup-storage
#
# &amp;lt;type&amp;gt; &amp;lt;mountpoint&amp;gt; &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;   &amp;lt;fs type&amp;gt; &amp;lt;mount options&amp;gt; &amp;lt;misc options&amp;gt;

disk_config disk1 align-at:32256B
primary -       128     -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       5120    -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       5120    -       -
logical -       2000-   -       -

disk_config disk2 align-at:32256B
primary -       128     -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       5120    -       -
logical -       2048    -       -
logical -       5120    -       -
logical -       2000-   -       -

disk_config raid
raid1   /boot   disk1.1,disk2.1 ext3    rw,noatime
raid1   swap    disk1.5,disk2.5 swap    sw
raid1   /       disk1.6,disk2.6 ext3    rw,errors=remount-ro
raid1   /var    disk1.7,disk2.7 ext3    rw,noatime
raid1   /tmp    disk1.8,disk2.8 ext3    rw,noatime
raid1   /usr    disk1.9,disk2.9 ext3    rw,noatime
rai&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Dreezer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T20:54:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9542">
    <title>whole disk RAID partitioned directly, with Grub BIOS partition</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9542</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

We are using FAI 3.48 with Ubuntu 12.04. We are trying to come up with a 
working setup-storage config for whole disk RAID. We've managed to put 
together a configuration with LVM, but we can't get grub2 to install in 
that configuration, so we would like to avoid LVM altogether and keep it 
simple. The working LVM-based config is such:

disk_config raid
raid1  -  sda,sdb - -

disk_config lvm
vg  vg0   md0
vg0-root /    16000 ext4 rw,errors=remount-ro createopts="-m3"
vg0-swap swap 4000  swap sw
vg0-var  /var 5000  ext4 rw                   createopts="-m5"

I will enumerate what we would like to accomplish:

1) Be able to parition /dev/m0 directly without LVM. When paritioning an 
md device, setup-storage tries find a partition /dev/md01, whereas the 
partition really is /dev/md0p1. We tried to do this with:

disk_config /dev/md0

2) We would like to give options to mdadm (e.g. to set metadata to 0.9),

3) We would like to be able to give options to parted (e.g. to create a 
GRUB BIOS boot partition&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Iordan Iordanov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T20:32:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9541">
    <title>Re: Fai-mirror failing after upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9541</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
The problem was in apt-move. It contains a bug also:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=398297#20

I applied the proposed change, and now it works like a charm.

With kind regards,

Jurrie

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jurrie Overgoor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T13:01:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9540">
    <title>Re: errors while running fai-mirror</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9540</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hello Martin,

Recently, I bumped into the same problem you had. It is a bug in 
Aptitude. There seems to be a bug in aptitude with the -d switch. It 
creates an infinite loop. This is fixed in aptitude 0.6.7-1.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/975793

I previously had Aptitude 0.6.6-1ubuntu1, and after I manually 
downloaded and installed 0.6.7-1 the infinite loop is gone.

I still don't have a proper partial mirror though. Fai-mirror is 
failing! Did you by any chance bumped into this problem as well, and 
managed to solve this?

With kind regards,

Jurrie

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jurrie Overgoor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T10:28:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9539">
    <title>Re: manual redhat grub configuration?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9539</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
    &amp;gt; Maybe someone has already done this. I'm currently a bit at a loss on how
    &amp;gt; to manually configure a RedHat (or more specifically OracleLinux 6) grub
    &amp;gt; bootloader.
Did you already looked how this is done in the examples of FAI 4.0?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Lange</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T21:49:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9538">
    <title>Re: Proper way to find out if an (initial) installation is beingperformed?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9538</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
    &amp;gt; i use:
    &amp;gt; if [ -n "$flag_initial" ]; then
    &amp;gt; (cf. section 8.3. "The setup routines of the install clients" in the FAI
    &amp;gt; Guide)
Right, this is another type of "initial" inside FAI. It's only disk
setup-storage related.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Lange</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T21:03:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9537">
    <title>Re: Proper way to find out if an (initial) installation is beingperformed?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9537</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
    &amp;gt; Hello
    &amp;gt; In the original prepareapt hook, there are (were?) two different if-clauses:

    &amp;gt; if [ -f /var/run/fai/FAI_INSTALLATION_IN_PROGRESS ]; then

    &amp;gt; if [ $do_init_tasks -eq 1 ] ; then
In FAI 4.0 there's a third one:
  
if [ $FAI_ACTION = "install" ]; then

    &amp;gt; I'm not too sure what they are supposed to mean so I ask for
    &amp;gt; clarification. Judging from the code/names they seem to guard the enclosed
    &amp;gt; code against running during a softupdate.
Yes, I think you are right.

    &amp;gt; b) What is the proper/best/most obvious/recommended way to let code run
    &amp;gt; only during the initial installation?
The third one should be the cleanest way IMO.

    &amp;gt; c) Does install/dirinstall make a difference?
That depends on your needs. $do_init_tasks and
FAI_INSTALLATION_IN_PROGRESS does not distiguish between
install, dirinstall, softupdate, whatever, but $FAI_ACTION does.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Lange</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T21:01:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9536">
    <title>Re: Proper way to find out if an (initial) installation is beingperformed?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9536</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
i haven't tried softupdate, so if your goal is to use that i may not be
addressing the root of your question.  however, from what i can see in
fai 3.4.8:


it looks like $do_init_tasks is related to whether fai is "called as an
init substitute" (/usr/sbin/fai:278).  FAI_INSTALLATION_IN_PROGRESS
appears to be a stamp storing the pid of an in-progress installation.


i use:
if [ -n "$flag_initial" ]; then
(cf. section 8.3. "The setup routines of the install clients" in the FAI
Guide)


unsure.  i only use $flag_initial for disk-related changes in my
configuration (partition and mountdisk hooks), so they're not relevant
to a dirinstall.  you could (as mentioned in the guide) use a
class/*.var snippet to set it if desired.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>andrew bezella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T15:10:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9535">
    <title>manual redhat grub configuration?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9535</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello

Maybe someone has already done this. I'm currently a bit at a loss on how
to manually configure a RedHat (or more specifically OracleLinux 6) grub
bootloader.

It seems most of the work is done via /sbin/new-kernel-pkg which is called
automatically while installing a new kernel image. However some parts are
missing. (Namely a default /boot/grub/grub.conf, some symlinks and
/etc/sysconfig/grub)

What I've done so far:

1.) Create a base image

yum --installroot=/tmp/scratch groupinstall Base
chroot /tmp/scratch/ su -
yum remove kernel kernel-firmware
rpm -e kernel --noscripts

[Maybe removing the kernel is a mistake. But I don't need it at this stage
and apart from that it fails to install properly anyhow due to a missing
/etc/fstab]

2.) configure repository

[modify prepareapt hook]
fcopy /etc/yum.repos.d/public-yum-ol6.repo

3.) create files &amp;amp; symlinks

[modify instsoft hook]

$target/etc/sysconfig/grub should contain:

boot=/dev/sda
forcelba=0

default=0
timeout=5
hiddenmenu

ln -sf '../boot/grub/g&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Neumann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T13:54:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9534">
    <title>Proper way to find out if an (initial) installation is beingperformed?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9534</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello

In the original prepareapt hook, there are (were?) two different if-clauses:

if [ -f /var/run/fai/FAI_INSTALLATION_IN_PROGRESS ]; then

if [ $do_init_tasks -eq 1 ] ; then

I'm not too sure what they are supposed to mean so I ask for
clarification. Judging from the code/names they seem to guard the enclosed
code against running during a softupdate.

a) What's the difference between these two? Is there any?
b) What is the proper/best/most obvious/recommended way to let code run
only during the initial installation?
c) Does install/dirinstall make a difference?

bye
thomas


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Neumann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T10:56:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9533">
    <title>Re: install 32Bit-packages on 64Bit-system failed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9533</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Appendix:
#aptitude install ia32-libs
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  ia32-libs{b}
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 3,362 B of archives. After unpacking 41.0 kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch which is a virtual package.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Keep the following packages at their current version:
1)     ia32-libs [Not Installed]         


On 05/21/2012 12:57 PM, Sabine Schmidt wrote:


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sabine Schmidt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T11:14:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9532">
    <title>Re: install 32Bit-packages on 64Bit-system failed</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.fai/9532</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Here the output after an fai-installation:
# apt-cache search ia32-libs
ia32-libs - ia32 shared libraries - transitional package
# aptitude search ia32-libs
p   ia32-libs                                                      -
ia32 shared libraries - transitional package

And the update-process:
Get:20 http://fai.xxx.de precise/restricted Sources [5470 B]
Get:21 http://fai.xxx.de precise/universe Sources [5019 kB]
Get:22 http://fai.xxx.de precise/multiverse Sources [155 kB]
Get:23 http://fai.xxx.de precise/main amd64 Packages [1273 kB]
Get:24 http://fai.xxx.de precise/restricted amd64 Packages [8452 B]
Get:25 http://fai.xxx.de precise/universe amd64 Packages [4786 kB]
Get:26 http://fai.xxx.de precise/multiverse amd64 Packages [119 kB]

And now after an manually update of packages:
# apt-cache search ia32-libs
ia32-libs - ia32 shared libraries - transitional package
ia32-libs-multiarch - Multi-arch versions of former ia32-libraries
# aptitude search ia32-libs
p   ia32-libs                                      &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sabine Schmidt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T10:57:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.debian.fai">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.debian.fai</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

