gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc

Processed: Re: Bug#674605: wine: does not build on kfreebsd-amd64

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:45:05

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #674605 [wine] wine: does not build on kfreebsd-amd64
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#674605: wine: does not build on kfreebsd-amd64

Sven Joachim — 2012-05-26T07:42:44

severity 674605 important
thanks

On 2012-05-25 23:42 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:


Hardly, since the package has never been built on kfreebsd-amd64 in the
first place.


This is unlikely to change, it seems.  Do you have any plans to do
something about it?

Cheers,
       Sven

Bug#673544: marked as done (openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t&{aka int&}' vs. 'long int')

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:42:04

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2012 09:33:30 +0200
with message-id <CAMqf4EHeVDFG_5bJc_6D=dmp67-kAxD4nxiUD7=TcMoawDuxxg< at >mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Reassign 673544 to swig2.0 and close
has caused the Debian Bug report #673544,
regarding openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Reassign 673544 to swig2.0 and close

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:27:06

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #672332 {Done: "D. Barbier" <bouzim< at >gmail.com>} [swig2.0] hugin - FTBFS: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}'
Bug #673663 {Done: "D. Barbier" <bouzim< at >gmail.com>} [swig2.0] swig2.0: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' from expression of type 'long int'
Bug #673544 {Done: Torsten Landschoff <torsten< at >debian.org>} [swig2.0] openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int'
Failed to forcibly merge 672332: It is nonsensical for a bug to block itself (or a merged partner): 673544
Debbugs::Control::set_blocks('bug', 673544, 'block', 673544, 'add', 1, 'request_msgid', '<CAMqf4EHfiPzCJ14L8CJUJBfBbz3smwc=YDKNNSR2fW5YrwZP8A< at >mail.gma...', 'request_replyto', ...) called at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control.pm line 2117
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x1df8098)', 'requester', '"D. Barbier" <bouzim< at >gmail.com>', 'request_addr', 'control< at >bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgi

Bug#674628: chromium FTBFS against libglib2.0-dev from experimental

Jonathan Nieder — 2012-05-26T07:20:56

Source: chromium-browser
Version: 18.0.1025.168~r134367-1
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Forwarded: http://codereview.chromium.org/9360031/
Tags: upstream patch experimental fixed-upstream

   CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/ui/ui/base/l10n/l10n_util.o
 In file included from ui/base/l10n/l10n_util.cc:8:0:
 /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gutils.h:28:2: error: #error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly."

The glib changelog says:

 * It is no longer possible to include individual headers (like
   "ghash.h") -- you must #include <glib.h>.

Luckily it doesn't affect sid.  Fixed in trunk by r121141.

Bug#283173: w3c-sgml-lib vs w3-dtd-mathml

Nicholas Bamber — 2012-05-26T07:17:32

Vincnet, Maathieu,
Maybe after the freeze we should discuss making a clean up   a release 
goal for wheezy+1. It would be a rather small release goal, but it might 
not happen otherwise.


On 26/05/12 03:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

Processed (with 1 errors): Reassign 673544 to swig2.0 and close

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:18:07

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #673544 {Done: Torsten Landschoff <torsten< at >debian.org>} [src:openturns] openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openturns' to 'swig2.0'.
No longer marked as found in versions openturns/1.0-2.
No longer marked as fixed in versions swig2.0/2.0.6-1.
Bug #673544 {Done: Torsten Landschoff <torsten< at >debian.org>} [swig2.0] openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int'
Marked as found in versions swig2.0/2.0.5-1.
Bug #672332 {Done: "D. Barbier" <bouzim< at >gmail.com>} [swig2.0] hugin - FTBFS: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}'
Bug #673663 {Done: "D. Barbier" <bouzim< at >gmail.com>} [swig2.0] swig2.0: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' from expression of type 'long int'
Bug #673544 {Done: Torsten Landschoff <torsten< at >debian.org>} [swig2.0] openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address t

Bug#673663: marked as done (swig2.0: invalid initialization ofreference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' from expression of type'long int')

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:03:04

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2012 08:58:11 +0200
with message-id <CAMqf4EE8OzAJmV7ECewJN0Tg1QbzUDwiV32FFOkvogiTAs7bjw< at >mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed in swig2.0 2.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #672332,
regarding swig2.0: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' from expression of type 'long int'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#672332: marked as done (hugin - FTBFS: invalid initialization ofreference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}')

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T07:03:04

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2012 08:58:11 +0200
with message-id <CAMqf4EE8OzAJmV7ECewJN0Tg1QbzUDwiV32FFOkvogiTAs7bjw< at >mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed in swig2.0 2.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #672332,
regarding hugin - FTBFS: invalid initialization of reference of type 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#674627: libnet-handlersocket-perl: Undefined symbols in .so

Alexander Kuznetsov — 2012-05-26T06:20:35

Package: libnet-handlersocket-perl
Version: 1.0.6-80-g88bf1e0-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

an attempt to do:

perl -MNet::HandlerSocket

produces:

Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/auto/Net/HandlerSocket/HandlerSocket.so' for module Net::HandlerSocket:
        /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Net/HandlerSocket/HandlerSocket.so: undefined symbol: _ZN4dena13verbose_levelE at
        /usr/share/perl/5.14/XSLoader.pm line 71.
at /usr/lib/perl5/Net/HandlerSocket.pm line 31
Compilation failed in require.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted.


perl-Net-HandlerSocket may not be configured before libhsclient is built. Without `libhsclient' Makefile.PL renders no EXTRALIBS and
LDLOADLIBS variables in Makefile with mostly no diagnostics:

host< at >src/handlersocket-1.0.6-80-g88bf1e0/perl-Net-HandlerSocket$ perl Makefile.PL 
Checking if your kit is complete...
Warning: the following files are missing in your kit:
lib/HandlerSocket.pm
Please inform the author.
Warning: -L../libhsclient

Bug#627744: marked as done (libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl:Can't locate object method "lib/Foo/Bar.pm" via package"Module::Starter")

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T06:09:06

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2012 06:06:11 +0000
with message-id <E1SYA8h-0004Mx-23< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#627744: fixed in libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl 0.42-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #627744,
regarding libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl: Can't locate object method "lib/Foo/Bar.pm" via package "Module::Starter"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#674300: marked as done (getfem++: FTBFS:./gmm/gmm_vector.h:245:54: error: 'erase' was not declared in thisscope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup atthe point of instantiation [-fpermissive])

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T05:45:15

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2012 07:31:28 +0200
with message-id <CALF6qJm3Ew4NSMrym9swFAAfBrwRRA=hnNGT_ozNoWKTf-ifMQ< at >mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed in 4.1.1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #674300,
regarding getfem++: FTBFS: ./gmm/gmm_vector.h:245:54: error: 'erase' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Processed: Fixed in 4.1.1-10

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T05:45:08

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #674300 [src:getfem++] getfem++: FTBFS: ./gmm/gmm_vector.h:245:54: error: 'erase' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Marked as fixed in versions getfem++/4.1.1-10.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#674300: Fixed in 4.1.1-10

Anton Gladky — 2012-05-26T05:31:28

fixed 674300 4.1.1-10
thanks

Bug#674339: vavoom: FTBFS: Could NOT find JPEG

Aditya Vaidya — 2012-05-26T05:43:18

Maybe 'vavoom' needs to Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev?

Sincerely,
kroq-gar78

Bug#649151: cdbs: documentation missing

Jonathan Nieder — 2012-05-26T04:27:18

Hi Jonas,

Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:


Jonas Smedegaard wrote:


I just noticed this bug in the context of general RC bugfixing, but it
has affected me before so I can understand where Steve was coming from.
(If it were me, I'd treat it as important, not serious, though.)  What
documentation do you recommend

 (1) that someone new to cdbs start with
 (2) that someone familiar with cdbs use as a reference

?  For simplicity, I think it would be fine to render it as plain text
and treat that as the canonical form in the short term, for example.

What do you think?

Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan

Processed: (whoops)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T03:39:07

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #672095 [src:serna-free] serna-free: FTBFS: src/qtlocalpeer.cpp:103:54: error: '::getuid' has not been declared
Marked as found in versions serna-free/4.4.0.20111005-1.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: The affected piece of code was not changed between -1.1and -1.2, so this affects the -1.1 version as well

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T03:39:05

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #666230 [libldap-2.4-2] libldap-2.4-2: ldap_result returns -1 when called from sssd
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.28-1.1.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#672095: found in 4.4.0.20111005

Paul Tagliamonte — 2012-05-26T03:35:27

found 672095 4.4.0.20111005-1
thanks

Found this when I tested the version from experemental.

There are a lot of files to be patched. If you (or upstream) doesn't get
to it right away, It's on my radar.

Thanks!
  -- Paul

Bug#672032: patch attached

Paul Tagliamonte — 2012-05-26T03:31:04

tags 672032 + patch
thanks

Howdy, Enrico,

I've wrapped up a quick patch to resolve the FTBFS.

Have a great day!
  - Paul

Processed: patch attached

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-26T03:33:06

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #672032 [src:debtags] debtags: FTBFS: debtags.cc:319:23: error: 'unlink' was not declared in this scope
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #672032 to the same tags previously set
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.