http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8315 <pre>Today I reconfigured buildbot (renamed schedulers) while there where some changes waiting for the treeStableTimer., there are some changes awaiting in the database. Now the reconfiguration does not succeed as an internal error occurs during the creation of the scheduler: The stacktrace in the buildbot.log contains an error "(InternalError) current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block" The last buildbot source in this stacktrace is at File "/home/buildmaster/buildbot/buildbot-latest-mr-gui/master/buildbot/db/schedulers.py", line 45 The statement that follows looks good: UPDATE scheduler_changes SET important=%(important)s WHERE scheduler_changes.objectid = %(objectid_1)s AND scheduler_changes.changeid = %(wc_changeid)s' {'wc_changeid': 934, 'important': 1, 'objectid_1': 39} The error occurs in db.schedulers.classifyChanges. This method relies on the integrity check of the database. When an insert does not succeed then an update is performed. </pre> Harry Borkhuis 2012-05-23T14:25:07 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8314 <pre>I've found some old messages fron 2007 about FileUpload and Download and globbing - but nothing since then. Is there a suggested solution for handling globbing with both Upload and Download ? The reason being that while my build number is generated by Buildbot - the software itself sets its version number - and I don't want that logic to move since we can track it in SVN. Since its only the upload/download steps that need to deal with the specifics of filenames, would be useful to handle the case. richard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9M</pre> Richard Offer 2012-05-21T18:11:10 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8313 <pre>The problem you are encountering is due to the fact that a build step instance needs to act both as a instance and as a factory. You need to add an addFactoryArguments call to the constructor as detailed here: http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/current/manual/customization.html#writing-buildstep-constructors This state of affairs isn't ideal, and has been fixed in trunk. Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Tom Prince 2012-05-16T18:28:09 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8312 <pre> Hi, I am using Buildbot 0.8.6p1 with Twisted 12.0.0. I have a problem in using **kwargs with the MasterShellCommand. I am trying the following: class NewClass(MasterShellCommand): def __init__(self, **kwargs): self.arg1 = kwargs.get('arg1') self.arg2 = kwargs.get('arg2') print self.arg1 print self.arg2 MasterShellCommand.__init__(self, "") def start(self): self.command=[self.arg1 + 'somestring', WithProperties("build-%s.tar.gz", "revision"), self.arg2] return MasterShellCommand.start(self) def finished(self, result): ... it is called NewClass(arg1='path', arg2='string') Everything is just fine when I am running buildbot checkconfig The print statements deliver the expected outputs. When I am running the buildstep the logfile shows exceptions.TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'str' So for some reason self.arg1 and self.arg2 are a None object </pre> Jürgen Schulz-Brüssel 2012-05-16T15:05:22 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8311 <pre> This is part of the story, but there is another place where you can control how build requests get merged: http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/latest/manual/cfg-global.html#cfg-mergeRequests http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/latest/manual/cfg-builders.html#merging-build-requests Going back to the original scenario, if you prefer separate results for changes 1, 2, 3 and 4, you can configure Buildbot to not merge the requests (see above). If you want to save a bit of time in the long run (with slightly more delay before a build is triggered), you might want to use the tree stable timer that Albert mentioned, so that the scheduler has time to see changes 2, 3 and 4 after 1 comes in. In this case, the default request merge settings should work. </pre> Charles Lepple 2012-05-16T12:35:30 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8310 <pre> Iirc, there is a timeout setting in the scheduler for this: From the "scheduling builds" manual section: Many schedulers can be configured to wait a while after seeing a source-code change - this is the tree stable timer. The timer allows multiple commits to be "batched" together. This is particularly useful in distributed version control systems, where a developer may push a long sequence of changes all at once. To save resources, it's often desirable only to test the most recent change. Albert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> A.T.Hofkamp 2012-05-16T08:23:25 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8309 <pre>Hi there, I am using buildbot as my CI tool. I have a question about multiple changes. Hope anyone can help me. Thanks. I use git repository to manage my code and use git_buildbot.py to send changes to buildbot. Recently I find if multiple changes are sent, buildbot only buids the first and the last changes. For example, there are changes 1, 2, 3, 4. I am sure all of them are sent to buildbot from the log. But buildbot only builds change 1 and 4. Change 2 and 3 are displayed on the waterfall view, but not built. I am wondering if it's normal. I haven't found anything in documentation. Is there anybody able to help me figure out? Thanks. Cheers, Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm</pre> Eric Zhu 2012-05-16T08:16:55 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8308 <pre> That sourcestamp dictionary can be used to set any attributes -- it's intended to be used with renderables. So it might get a revision from a property, or set the project or codebase explicitly, for example. I think that supplying a sourcestampset would be a good alternative, here. Dustin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-12T14:56:43 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8307 <pre>I am looking at adding multirepo functionality to the triggerstep, but I am not sure about the sourcestamp attribute. The Triggerstep can be configured with a SourceStamp dictionairy. Is this only used to pass repository, branch and revision or is there other information passed to the step. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Harry Borkhuis 2012-05-11T14:55:32 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8306 <pre> Yes, thanks all! I will make time to give it a test this week. Gav... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Gavin McDonald 2012-05-10T09:43:55 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8305 <pre> The documentation is updated. I'll add some release notes soon. Existing, single-repo installs will continue to work as they have. Dustin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-09T16:20:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8304 <pre>Where can one read about about the multirepo feature and its implications to existing deployments, if any? Thanks, Jorge On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell &lt;dustin&lt; at &gt;v.igoro.us&gt;wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Jorge Gonzalez 2012-05-09T16:03:52 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8303 <pre>I just merged Harry's multirepo3 branch, which brings in the last of the multirepo implementation. This merge alone was 80 commits. There are doubtless still bugs and minor oversights, but nothing we can't handle. This has been a HUGE project. Harry's been at it for quite a while now, and his dedication and attention to detail show in the results. Thank you, Harry -- and Benoît, too! -- for a substantial contribution to Buildbot. This puts us on the final approach to 0.8.7, so shut down your approved electronic devices, check that your seat-backs and tray tables in the full upright and locked position, and find some time in your schedule to test out the master branch. We're going to need all the help we can get to shake out the last few bugs, and avoid a 0.8.7p1! As things settle out a bit more, I'll make some tarballs for download and announce them here, for easy pip-installing. Seriously, QA has been the biggest pain-point for releasing Buildbot: most of the testing happens *after* a release. </pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-09T04:42:29 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8302 <pre> Twisted has been known to do this, yes. Try restarting the slave Dustin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-08T00:13:27 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8301 <pre> I'm trying to get the Try scheduler to work , but my Windows build slave is having a problem finding the patch executable remoteFailed: [Failure instance: Traceback from remote host -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "c:\BOT\win32\bin\lib\site-packages\buildbot_slave-0.8.6p1-py2.7.egg\buildslave\runprocess.py", line 201, in processEnded self.command.finished(sig, rc) File "c:\BOT\win32\bin\lib\site-packages\buildbot_slave-0.8.6p1-py2.7.egg\buildslave\runprocess.py", line 687, in finished d.callback(rc) File "c:\BOT\win32\bin\lib\site-packages\twisted-12.0.0-py2.7-win32.egg\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 368, in callback self._startRunCallbacks(result) File "c:\BOT\win32\bin\lib\site-packages\twisted-12.0.0-py2.7-win32.egg\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 464, in _startRunCallbacks self._runCallbacks() --- &lt;exception caught here&gt; --- File "c:\BOT\win32\bin\lib\site-packages\twisted-12.0.0-py2.7-win32.egg\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 551, in _runCallbacks current.r</pre> Richard Offer 2012-05-06T19:03:20 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8300 <pre>Yes I looked it up .. I am going to upgrade and if it is still a problem maybe take on the bug myself. Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Todd Cooper 2012-05-06T13:44:40 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8299 <pre>This sounds like http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/1980 to me.. Dustin On May 4, 2012 12:19 PM, "Todd Cooper" &lt;todd_cooper-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-05T21:36:52 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8298 <pre>On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Catherine Knutson &lt;CKnutson-WkB8o6zIW7y3Yd4R8JNYNw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: Interesting - neither of these versions are released yet. The version of Mock isnt't particularly important, but I suspect that whatever 0.8.0b1 is has a bug. Hopefully they haven't moved the exceptions module, but if so we'll deal with that when the new version is released. The latest sqlalchemy is 0.7.6 -- give that a shot? pip install sqlalchemy==0.7.6 FWIW, I tried installing 0.8.0p1 in case it was hidden on pypi: $ pip install -U sqlalchemy==0.8.0b1 Downloading/unpacking sqlalchemy==0.8.0b1 Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement sqlalchemy==0.8.0b1 (from versions: ) No distributions matching the version for sqlalchemy==0.8.0b1 Storing complete log in /home/dustin/.pip/pip.log so, I'm not sure how you ended up with that installed? Dustin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event</pre> Dustin J. Mitchell 2012-05-05T16:41:49 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8297 <pre> On May 4, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Tom Prince wrote: I was a bit misleading - the problem wasn't so much variables it was keeping the build steps synchronized with what the underlying cmake/make files knew about the build. The old bamboo system used globs to upload files so it didn't need to know the exact details about what the build id was (its used as the RPM release number and hence is in the filename). I made the decision to build some of those details in the buildbot system so I could use the official buildbot means of file transfer (rather than a shell call to rsync) - but that meant having to d things like calculate the build id in buildbot and then pass it down to make`1. It was that that took so long - and I still don't have what I want - but I have what I need….. Thanks for the suggestion - not sure if I'll do it (want vs need)… richard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all </pre> Richard Offer 2012-05-05T04:06:18 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8296 <pre>An alternate hack for running code at build time is to throw it in a step's doStepIf function (and then have that always return true, if no other conditional behavior is desired for that step). Sent from Android On May 4, 2012 12:13 PM, "Tom Prince" &lt;tom.prince-yfeSBMgouQjk1uMJSBkQmQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Buildbot-devel mailing list Buildbot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel </pre> Amber Yust 2012-05-04T19:45:54 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel/8295 <pre> You can use Property instead of WithProperties to get a number, assuming that the property was originally specified as number (i.e. not set by SetProperties, for example). But, that won't allow you do arithmetic with it like you show above. The trouble is that the code written is evaluated at configure time, but you need the calculation done at build time. The way to do that, is to write an IRenderable instance that does what you want. (This basically involves writting a class with a method getRenderingFor. You don't necessarily need to keep them in sync. You can specify environment varialbes on the slave or builder or on indivual build steps. And if you want these to depend on properties, you can use WithProperties in the dicts these take. Certainly, the current documentation is lacking here. The handling of properties has become more flexible in the last few versions, and the documentation hasn't kept up. I hope to get some improved documentation written for 0.8.7. Any comments would be apprecieated.</pre> Tom Prince 2012-05-04T18:56:57 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.python.buildbot.devel