http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35465 Alex said: I'm open to contributing this. The latest source is available via svn: svn co https://groovytools.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/groovytools/trunk/groovytool s/builder Feel free to contact me with questions either on this list, the developer list, or directly at didge at foundrylogic.com as you feel appropriate. Regards, didge at foundrylogic.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email didge 2008-08-29T17:21:21 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35464 Guillaume said: I actually came across Steven's post while I was putting the final touches on MetaBuilder and I intend to go back to it looking to see what good ideas can be leveraged. I think that would make sense. These are some interesting ideas... Regards, didge --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email didge 2008-08-29T16:56:13 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35463 Setya schrieb: Expando knows only properties and properties that act as methods of the same name. A bit like in Ruby, where you don't have a difference between methods and properties as we have it in Groovy. Anyway, because of that using this "getter" works, as .myProperty searches also for the method getMyProperty, which will also search for the property getMyProperty. Just always remember that Expando is property based, not method based. that's the direct way then of course. yes, that method is more or less directly mapped to the myProperty property bye blackdrag Jochen Theodorou 2008-08-29T16:48:15 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35462 | Dierk, could you please explain why binding has higher | priority than object itself in this case ? | I mean not implementation details, but the idea behind these | priorities. ---- class Test { def prop = 1 def foo() { println prop} } Test t = new Test() t.with { prop = 2 foo() } ---- prints 1 because in prop=2 the prop reference is an unknown reference, which in Scripts results in putting such a reference as a variable into the script's binding. That's the rule for unknown references in scripts. This rule has precedence over the rules for resolution of 'vanilla names'. With the rule above the programmer has a choice: if you want to put prop into the binding, use the above, if you don't, use t.prop. If the rules were the other way around, it would be more difficult to put 'prop' with the respective value into the binding (something like binding.variables.prop = 2). I wouldn't claim that this is a very good justification nor do I think it has been a deliberate choice at all. A Dierk König 2008-08-29T15:06:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35461 2008/8/29 Dierk König <dierk.koenig< at >canoo.com>: Dierk, could you please explain why binding has higher priority than object itself in this case ? I mean not implementation details, but the idea behind these priorities. Regards, Sergey Bondarenko. Sergey Bondarenko 2008-08-29T13:07:40 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35460 Hi! Object.with(...) is already implemented in Groovy: http://groovy.codehaus.org/groovy-jdk/java/lang/Object.html#with(groovy.lang.Closure closure) Is it suitable for you? Regards, Sergey Bondarenko. 2008/8/29 Goetzmann Bertrand <BGoetzmann-9C0u+zCU0OrENY/9uD7kfw< at >public.gmane.org>: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Sergey Bondarenko 2008-08-29T13:01:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35459 seems like expandos dont handle your closure as a property but as an ordinary function called getMyProperty(). same for myObject.myProperty = {....} - it creates a function called myProperty(). i never used expandos so i dont know if/how you can add closures as properties.. cheers Setya schrieb: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Norbert Lazzeri 2008-08-29T12:39:33 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35458 Thank you Graeme, It's exactly what I wanted to achieve. Applied to my example, we can write: test.with { println prop1 println prop2 } Best regards, Bertrand. -----Message d'origine----- De : graeme.rocher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org [mailto:graeme.rocher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org] De la part de Graeme Rocher Envoyé : vendredi 29 août 2008 13:14 À : user-xGCSv8xhfmxnkHa44VUL00B+6BGkLq7r< at >public.gmane.org Objet : Re: [grails-user] Implementing the Delphi "with" instruction in Groovy There is already a with method in Groovy http://groovy.codehaus.org/groovy-jdk/java/lang/Object.html#with(groovy.lang.Closure%20closure) Cheers On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Goetzmann Bertrand <BGoetzmann-9C0u+zCU0OrENY/9uD7kfw< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Goetzmann Bertrand 2008-08-29T12:37:08 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35457 Groovy already has this: ---- class Starter { static void main(args){ Test t = new Test() t.with { prop = 2 foo() } } } class Test { def prop = 1 def foo() { println prop} } ---- Note: this does not work if you have the main() code as a Script since prop=2 would then be resolved against the Script binding. The 'with' method that takes a closure was formerly called 'identity' (the alias is still available). See Groovy in Action chapter 9 P.286. cheers Dierk http://groovy.canoo.com/gina | -----Original Message----- | From: Goetzmann Bertrand [mailto:BGoetzmann-9C0u+zCU0OrENY/9uD7kfw< at >public.gmane.org] | Sent: Freitag, 29. August 2008 12:11 | To: user-i9PBDF1N6cxnkHa44VUL00B+6BGkLq7r< at >public.gmane.org | Subject: [groovy-user] Implementing the Delphi "with" | instruction in Groovy | | Hello, | | In the Delphi language, "with" is a key word that permits to | apply a shortcut with object references. | Here a simple use case with a reference "test" of the | hypothetical class | Te Dierk König 2008-08-29T12:36:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35456 the timing couldnt be better. i just thought about how to implement a builder for my tree. this could really spare my some time :) didge schrieb: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Norbert Lazzeri 2008-08-29T12:24:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35455 2008/8/29 Graeme Rocher <graeme< at >g2one.com>: Yes, it will be a breaking change. I think it is more naturally to use DELEGATE_FIRST strategy in this case, what do you think? Maybe you know if this change breaks some existing Groovy or Grails code? Regards, Sergey Bondarenko. Sergey Bondarenko 2008-08-29T14:34:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35454 Sounds very interesting and promising. If didge is interested to contribute I would love to review code and help with that. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Graeme Rocher <graeme-4lfDYv8giPwAvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Alex Tkachman 2008-08-29T11:08:31 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35453 Raise an issue on codehaus JIRA http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS Cheers On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Eric Tetz <erictetz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Graeme Rocher 2008-08-29T10:13:31 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35452 Eric Tetz schrieb: strange... your email address is not listed in xircles. bye blackdrag Jochen Theodorou 2008-08-29T10:11:14 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35451 Hello, In the Delphi language, "with" is a key word that permits to apply a shortcut with object references. Here a simple use case with a reference "test" of the hypothetical class Test: test.call1(); test.prop1 := 'Hello'; test.call2(); These statements can be replaced by: with test do begin call1(); prop1 := 'Hello'; call2(); end; The Delphi's compiler is able to resolve the right calls. "with" permits to have statements clearer and more concise. So, I ask me how we can do something like this in the Groovy language. Thinking of this morning, here my first approach using MOP (the code bellow works in the Groovy console): // Define a static method "with" on class Object Object.metaClass.static.with = { Object ref, Closure cl -> cl.delegate = ref cl() } class Test { def prop1 = "Salut !" int prop2 } def test = new Test() // "with" in action with the reference "test" Object.with(test) { println prop1 println prop2 } // You can also apply "with" without a reference var Goetzmann Bertrand 2008-08-29T10:10:35 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35450 Just curious though, why *do* you need to check if the variable is already defined? I guess it'll also help if we knew whether you were writing a class or a script. On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Eric Tetz <erictetz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Saager Mhatre 2008-08-29T09:33:16 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35449 Hi all, Suppose I have the following dynamic object created via Expando : def myObject = new Expando(); myObject.getMyProperty = {-> print 'Hello World.';} If I accessed the property with 'myObject.myProperty' it didn't print anything, but it didn't throw error either. But If I change into : myObject.myProperty = {-> print 'Hello World.';} and accessed using 'myObject.myProperty()', it works as expected. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Setya Setya 2008-08-29T08:16:18 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35448 I think this is a great idea, and would make a good contribution to Groovy core What does everyone else think? Cheers On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:35 AM, didge <didge-41y80QixNfCEsAWIqfabrw< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Graeme Rocher 2008-08-29T08:12:53 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35447 Hello All, I want to automate the update of wsdl definition action of a SoapUI project. My project has got only one web service and one wsdl referred from it. When ever the wsdl has got changed I have to update the definition by right clicking on the mock service and selecting update interface. As I don't change the name of the wsdl and the location of it, I should be able to automatically update the definitions using some way. May be a groovy script. In the SoapUI web site it mentioned as it updates the definitions automatically when we reload SoapUI. I tried that after placing the modified wsdl in the same location. But it didn't update the project xml. Then I wanted to try using groovy to update the definitions automatically without clicking mouse. I am not sure what method in the API to use for this. SoapUI API documention is not descriptive enough to understand that. I tried using the soapui.impl.wsdl.actions.iface.UpdateInterfaceAction However when my groovy script ran it opens me the dialog box t Amila Rathnayake 2008-08-29T07:17:34 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35446 Cool, it also reminds me of Steven's post on builder-builder: http://groovy.dzone.com/news/statemachine-builder-builder-g I like the general idea and believe something like this should even be included in groovy-core. I believe we could extend this meta builder concept further to also support some further DSL tricks, like allowing assignments like in ConfigSlurper, or perhaps even allowing people to add properties to number to be able to say price: 14.99.dollars, etc, and to be able to also customize some operator overloading. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:35 AM, didge <didge-41y80QixNfCEsAWIqfabrw< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Guillaume Laforge 2008-08-29T07:11:52 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/35445 Perhaps because of the dot at the end of inFile ? Furthermore, where is inFile defined? On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:26 PM, SophosGuy <jackiegleason-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: Guillaume Laforge 2008-08-29T06:44:41 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user