gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Laurent Daynes — 2012-05-21T07:56:03

Vote: yes

Re: Project Proposal: PowerPC/AIX port

Chris Hegarty — 2012-05-18T18:12:33

Vote: yes

-Chris.

RE: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Iris Clark — 2012-05-18T17:49:47

Vote: yes

iris

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Deepak Bhole — 2012-05-17T12:27:04

Vote: yes

Deepak

* Simonis, Volker <volker.simonis-y6kNeMnOB+c< at >public.gmane.org> [2012-05-14 17:57]:

Re: RFR: Clarification of Project voting instructions

Volker Simonis — 2012-05-17T08:35:23

Hi Iris,

I think David was objecting the line "Votes must be cast in the open, on
the mailing list to which the call-for-votes was originally sent;" from
"Step 2: Vote" in the "Proposing a new Project" section and I agree that
that sentence should be changed to something like "Votes must be cast in
the open, on the discuss mailing list".

Besides this, the changes are ok from my side.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker

On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Iris Clark wrote:

Re: RFR: Clarification of Project voting instructions

Iris Clark — 2012-05-16T21:12:39

Hi, David.

Sorry about that.  I didn't notice that the ballot needed to be changed.  I've made a few more modifications.  Note that I think that the ballot's second new sentence might be unnecessary:

"Replying to this message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header." 
 
I'll leave it to review to determine if it is superfluous.

An updated set of diffs for (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project) is appended.

Thanks,
iris

diff -r 15c36b11b060 src/projects/index.html
--- a/src/projects/index.htmlWed May 16 08:24:23 2012 -0700
+++ b/src/projects/index.htmlWed May 16 13:51:50 2012 -0700
< at >< at > -1,6 +1,6 < at >< at >
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
-                      "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+                      "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
 
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
 <head>
< at >< at > -139,7 +139,7 < at >< at >
 Votes are due by <b>&lt;deadline&gt;</b>.
 
 Only curr

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

2012-05-16T21:08:00

Vote: yes

- Mark

Re: RFR: Clarification of Project voting instructions

David Holmes — 2012-05-16T20:32:42

Hi Iris,

As per my email on the other thread you also need to change:

"Votes must be cast in the open, on the mailing list to which the 
call-for-votes was originally sent;"

Thanks,
David

On 17/05/2012 5:45 AM, Iris Clark wrote:

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

David Holmes — 2012-05-16T20:28:28

That requires a couple of changes to the instructions including the 
statement:

"Votes must be cast in the open, on the mailing list to which the 
call-for-votes was originally sent;"

Thanks for fixing.

David

RFR: Clarification of Project voting instructions

Iris Clark — 2012-05-16T19:45:36

Hi Volker and David.

I've made changes to the Project overview page (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote) to address the problems with the voting instructions that you noted.

Please provide comments on the diffs I've appended to this message.

Thanks,
iris

diff -r 15c36b11b060 src/projects/index.html
--- a/src/projects/index.htmlWed May 16 08:24:23 2012 -0700
+++ b/src/projects/index.htmlWed May 16 11:11:56 2012 -0700
< at >< at > -488,8 +488,11 < at >< at >
 common case. </p></dd>
 
 <dt><a name="new-project-vote"></a><i>Step 2: Vote</i></dt>
-<dd> <p> Eligible voters cast their vote by replying to the proposal with the
-  first line of the message body in the following form: </p>
+<dd> <p> Eligible voters cast their vote by sending e-mail to
+  the <a href="mailto:discuss.at.openjdk.dot.java.dot.net">general discussion
+  list</a>.  Replying to the proposal will achieve this automatically for those
+  people whose mail programs honor the <code>Reply-To</code> header.  The first
+  line of the message body

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

2012-05-16T15:05:51

2012/5/16 1:42 -0700, volker.simonis-y6kNeMnOB+c< at >public.gmane.org:

The announce list is intentionally configured that way.  It always
sets the Reply-To header to point to the discuss list.


Iris -- Could you please clarify the voting instructions to say
explicitly that votes should go to the discuss list, and that the
announce list is configured to make this happen automatically (well,
at least for people whose mail programs honor the Reply-To header).


That's right.

- Mark

Obtaining methods executed at least once?

Andreas Sewe — 2012-05-16T08:56:43

Hi all,

I hope this is the right mailing list to ask such questions (if not,
please point me to the right one), as I couldn't find an obvious
analogue to lists like jikesrvm-researchers.

Is the a way (preferably using "diagnostic" rather than "develop"
options) to obtain a list of all methods executed at least once?
Currently I am considering "-XX:-UseInterpreter -XX:+LogCompilation",
but this seems to be an awfully indirect way to achieve my goal -- and
it may not even give correct results if the only call of m() is inlined
during compilation.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Best wishes,

Andreas

RE: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Simonis, Volker — 2012-05-16T08:42:32

Hi David,

I hope you are not right. I've sent the CFV to the announce list as requested in [1].
However the announce list is a moderated list and I could not influence the fact that
the mail which was finally posted to the subscribers of the list had the "reply-to" field
set to the discuss list.

This was confusing for me as well, but after looking at the previous CFVs (i.e. "Code Tools",
"Graal", "Penrose") I realized that they were all run in this way. Moreover [2] ultimately
suggests that the votes should be sent to the discuss list, so I suppose that inserting the 
"reply-to" field into the CFV's is just a courtesy of the announce list moderator (you should
probably ask Mark for the details because he runs the list).

So I think for now, until nobody else corrects me, it is unnecessary for anybody to re-send 
their votes.

With best regards,
Volker


[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-propose
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote

________________________________________

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

David Holmes — 2012-05-16T08:34:11

Hmmm some confusing instructions there:

Step 1: Propose

     Send a combined motion for the creation of the Project and the 
appointment of its initial Lead to the announcement list. The e-mail 
should contain the Project name, description, initial Lead name and 
qualifications, sponsoring Groups, and suggested initial Authors, 
Committers, Reviewers, if any. The voting method is Lazy Consensus and 
only current OpenJDK Members are eligible to vote.

     The format for the call-for-votes e-mail is as follows:

     To: announce at openjdk dot java dot net
     Subject: CFV: New Project: <project name>

...

Step 2: Vote

     Eligible voters cast their vote by replying to the proposal with 
the first line of the message body in the following form:

     Vote: <vote>

     where <vote> is one of yes, veto, or abstain. A justification for 
the vote may be provided on subsequent lines, and is required in order 
for a veto vote to be valid. Multiple votes are allowed but only the 
most recent vote will be co

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Alan Bateman — 2012-05-16T08:11:58

I thought the announce list was just for announcements, the voting on 
projects has been on the discuss list, as per:

http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote

I just checked Volker's mail with the CFV and he appears to have the 
reply-to set correctly, it's just that he sent the mail to announce too.

-Alan.

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

David Holmes — 2012-05-16T03:13:20

Volker,

Your reply-to was set to the discuss list but the mail was sent to the 
announce list, and the votes should go to the announce list not the 
discuss list.

Anyone who already voted on the discuss list should re-send their votes 
to the announce list.

David

On 15/05/2012 12:46 AM, Simonis, Volker wrote:

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Mario Torre — 2012-05-15T20:10:54

Vote: Yes

It's a very interesting project, I'll keep an eye on that!

Cheers,
Mario

2012/5/14 Simonis, Volker <volker.simonis-y6kNeMnOB+c< at >public.gmane.org>:

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

2012-05-15T18:54:24

Vote: yes

Cheers!
Chris
[This may be a duplicate as I sent a "yes" vote earlier but didn't see 
it on the list... ]

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Dalibor Topic — 2012-05-15T12:51:42

Vote: Yes.

On 5/14/12 4:46 PM, Simonis, Volker wrote:

cheers,
dalibor topic

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

Alan Bateman — 2012-05-15T09:22:21

Vote: yes

I would suggest that if the project finds that it needs to change the 
interface between HotSpot and the libraries, serviceability tools, etc., 
and if the intention is to push the changes to those interfaces into the 
mainline, that the project get broad agreement on the changes from the 
impacted areas first. I read Neil's reply and documenting some of these 
interfaces is welcome, it's just the concern that changes to these 
interfaces are potentially disruptive.

-Alan.

Re: CFV: New Project: PowerPC/AIX Port

2012-05-14T22:37:12

Vote: Yes
On 14/05/12 10:46 AM, Simonis, Volker wrote: