<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar">
    <title>gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1505"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1504"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1503"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1502"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1501"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1500"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1499"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1498"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1497"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1496"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1495"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1494"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1493"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1492"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1491"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1490"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1489"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1488"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1487"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1486"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1505">
    <title>error relating to opening an image file when doingroi analysis.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1505</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;To whom it may concern:

I am trying to do the roi batch analysis on my fmri data. But I encounter a 
problem. 

For some subjects data, I could not open the image file. See the error message 
below: 

MarsBaR analysis functions prepended to path
Design reporting                        :                        ...done
Fetching data                           :                         1/1   ??? 
Error using ==&amp;gt; spm_sample_vol
Cant open image file.

Error in ==&amp;gt; maroi.getdata at 103
  data = spm_sample_vol(data_imgs(i),...

Error in ==&amp;gt; maroi.get_marsy at 76
  [y vals vXYZ mat]  = getdata(o, VY);

Error in ==&amp;gt; marsbar at 985
marsY = get_marsy(o{:}, VY, sumfunc, 'v');

Error in ==&amp;gt; spm at 982
evalin('base',CBs{v-1})
 
??? Error while evaluating uicontrol Callback

I ever tried to search on the mailinglist to find some answers. But it seems 
that there are no definitive replies. 

Does anyone here know about it and how to fix it?

Thanks for your consideration in advance.

Best,
li


-----------------------------&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yansong</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T10:04:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1504">
    <title>Re: extracting mean percent signal change from 2 ormore ROIs using MarsBaR batch script</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1504</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
of the MarsBaR extract "percent signal change" script.  My goal is to run the 
script so I can extract percent signal change from multiple ROIs at once.  
Error:??? Error using ==&amp;gt; maroi.maroi at 136Use cell form of call to load 
multiple objectsError in ==&amp;gt; Marsbar_percent_signal_change at 17R  = maroi
(roi_file);Extract Mean Percent Signal Change script.  Problem indicated with 
comment.  
1) make sure you have imported your ROIs from WFU and saved them % 2) make 
sure you have spm and MarsBaR open and running 
SPM.mat');D = mardo(spm_name);% below is the automatic directory method % 
spm_name = HC% HC 
= '/media/HC/HC0012_01_IM/CFNL0000000166/ep2d_Encode_0004/SPM.mat'% extract 
ROI dataroi_file = spm_select(2, 'mat', 'Select ROI ');R  = maroi
(roi_file);         %       / \ %        |% ABOVE IS THE STEP THAT IS CAUSING 
MY PROBLEM % Fetch data into marsbar data objectY  = get_marsy(R, D, 'mean');% 
Get contrasts from original designxCon = get_contrasts(D);% Estimate design on 
RO&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T05:08:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1503">
    <title>Re: Percent signal change calculation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1503</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi, Matthew and Binu,

Thank you for your answers!

Yan


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Brett [mailto:matthew.brett&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:57 PM
To: MarsBaR users list
Subject: Re: [Marsbar-users] Percent signal change calculation

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Binu Thomas &amp;lt;binu.thomas&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;utsouthwestern.edu&amp;gt; wrote:

To add to Binu's answer - the percent signal change calculation is

1) - reconstruction of the event time course as you have modeled it
2) take a measure of that time course as the amount the signal has changed (the measure is usually the max difference from baseline, +ve if the max is &amp;gt; the min, -ve otherwise)
3) Divide that measure by the mean signal across the whole run in the ROI

So, if you add a temporal derivative, this can change the estimated shape of the HRF, and so the signal change, but it will not change
(much) if in fact your event is more or less canonical HRF shape.

Whether the implicit baseline is important is a little difficult to say.  I gene&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yan Fang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T22:02:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1502">
    <title>Re: Percent signal change calculation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1502</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Binu Thomas
&amp;lt;binu.thomas&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;utsouthwestern.edu&amp;gt; wrote:

To add to Binu's answer - the percent signal change calculation is

1) - reconstruction of the event time course as you have modeled it
2) take a measure of that time course as the amount the signal has
changed (the measure is usually the max difference from baseline, +ve
if the max is &amp;gt; the min, -ve otherwise)
3) Divide that measure by the mean signal across the whole run in the ROI

So, if you add a temporal derivative, this can change the estimated
shape of the HRF, and so the signal change, but it will not change
(much) if in fact your event is more or less canonical HRF shape.

Whether the implicit baseline is important is a little difficult to
say.  I generally use implicit baselines myself (by which I mean
unmodeled baseline tasks).  If you have no implicit baseline, and
therefore all the time of the run is covered by events in your model,
then you can run into a situation where the sum of the event
regressors i&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T17:56:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1501">
    <title>Re: Percent signal change calculation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1501</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I don't think the implicit baseline will affect your percent signal change, but having modeled both time and dispersion derivative can lower your percent signal change, as the signal is being split into both time and dispersion derivative bins. Area under the curve calculation can be used as an alternative ROI method.

Binu
________________________________
From: Yan Fang [yan.fang&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 6:09 PM
To: marsbar-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Marsbar-users] Percent signal change calculation

Hi,

When I did SPM analysis, I modeled  the events with HRF and both time derivative and dispersion derivative. Will this affect the percent signal change calculation? And we also have a default baseline (directional arrow images), will this affect the reliability of the method? Can area under the curve calculation be an alternative method for ROI analysis? Thank you!

Yan

________________________________

UT Southwestern Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.
--------&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Binu Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T02:38:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1500">
    <title>Percent signal change calculation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1500</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

When I did SPM analysis, I modeled  the events with HRF and both time derivative and dispersion derivative. Will this affect the percent signal change calculation? And we also have a default baseline (directional arrow images), will this affect the reliability of the method? Can area under the curve calculation be an alternative method for ROI analysis? Thank you!

Yan

________________________________

UT Southwestern Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________
Marsbar-users mailing list
Marsbar-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yan Fang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-27T23:09:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1499">
    <title>Re: raw vs. standardized % BOLD signal change</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1499</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Chaleece Sandberg &amp;lt;challysand&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

No, I'm afraid there isn't an easy way to get individual event
timecourses in Marsbar, unless you enter the individual events as
their own condition, and use FIR as the basis function.

If you do that you will probably find it is incredibly noisy - of
course you now only have one scan per point in your time course.

But from the later part of your email I wonder whether you just want
some sort of single HRF estimate per event?  In that case you'd still
need one condition per event, but you could use an HRF basis function.
 That would give you several scans to stabilize the signal for the
event.

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-27T17:47:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1498">
    <title>Re: raw vs. standardized % BOLD signal change</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1498</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Great, thanks!
One more question for this thread. I've been digging a bit, but can't
seem to find what need. It's possible I just don't know enough to
recognize the name of what I'm looking for.
I see in the FAQ that I can get the raw timecourse in a specific ROI
for the entire run.
Is there any way to extract that data for each event of one condition
within a run if the design is event-related? It's a bit messy trying
to align the conditions against the timecourse, especially since my
timing is not in multiples of the TR. For example, I have 50
randomized events of condition A within a run and would like to have a
list of 50 raw signal values within a specific ROI representing each
time condition A was
presented (rather than the average, which would be the % signal
change, correct?).
Thanks,
Chaleece

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matthew Brett &amp;lt;matthew.brett&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt;
To: MarsBaR users list &amp;lt;marsbar-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net&amp;gt;
Cc:
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:31:27 -0700
Subject: Re: [Marsba&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Chaleece Sandberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-25T12:54:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1497">
    <title>Re: [SPM] Compare 2 methods to extract %signal change in MarsBaR</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1497</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Matthew

I have a quick question about post hoc manipulation of contrast value data. Is it valid to take the mean contrast value across a group of ROIs from a putative network (say, the default mod network), to show that the regions of a network are more or less active across a group level in a given task?

Thanks

Mac



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mac Shine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-25T03:32:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1496">
    <title>Re: [SPM] Compare 2 methods to extract %signalchange in MarsBaR</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1496</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Ming-Tsung Tseng &amp;lt;d93421007&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ntu.edu.tw&amp;gt; wrote:

The first one is the % signal change, the second one is just the
contrast (combination of beta) values.    If you have just one HRF
regressor for your condition and just one session then the % signal
change = beta_event_1 * regressor_event1_max_height /
session_baseline, where 'regressor_event_1_max_height' is a
reconstructed regressor for and event of the duration you asked for.
So the signal change is just the beta times a scale factor.   If this
scalefactor is the same for your two events, then the contrast value
(beta2 - beta1, say) will be the same as the subtraction of the
percent signal change times a scale factor.

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobi&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T16:55:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1495">
    <title>Re: Q regarding Extract Roi (Full Options)</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1495</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Andrew Furman &amp;lt;afurman3&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;jhu.edu&amp;gt; wrote:

Yes, although it would be odd to specify things like global scaling.


You mean - what numbers are in the contrast image?  They are linear
combinations of the betas.  If you had a design matrix with 2
conditions, and the first two columns were an HRF regressor for
condition 1 and condition 2, and your contrast was [-1 1 0 0 ... ],
then the resulting contrast image is an image of the beta_0002.nii -
beta_0001.nii .

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T16:42:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1494">
    <title>Q regarding Extract Roi (Full Options)</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1494</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey All,
A couple of questions regarding some of the options/functions of Extract Roi(Full Options)...

1. Is it appropriate to use this function directly on the .con files generated after running your GLM (assuming that you choose not to specify a SPM.mat)? 

2. What is the nature of the value generated when you select raw data? That is, what does the value represent with respect to the contrast I have selected. A colleague of mine suggested that it was derived from the Betas in the selected .con, but I am not so sure. Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks in advance,
Andrew Furman
Graduate Student - Johns Hopkins University

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Furman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T14:47:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1493">
    <title>Compare 2 methods to extract %signal change in MarsBaR</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1493</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hi all,

My fMRI running is just alternating “on” (10 sec) and “off” (20 sec)
paradigm. Each subject thus has a first-level t contrast. In another
2nd-level analysis, these 20 t contrasts were also used to correlate with a
behavior score. Now I want to know the % signal change (%SC) in a specific
ROI in all my 20 subjects. 

METHOD 1
In the beginning, I extract %SC in this ROI by MarsBar individually:
(1)(matlab directory is in the t contrast of subject 1) “design” – “set
design from file” – select the contrast image of subject 1
(2)“data” – “extract ROI data (default” – select this ROI
(3)“Result” – “estimates results”
(4)“Results” – “% signal change” – event 1 = 10, event 2 = 20. Then I got
the %SC (value in event 1 – value in event 2)

Am I right? 

By this method, I can finally get 20 numbers (values) representing %SC in
this ROI for my group. But that means, I have to repeat these steps 20
times…..time-wasting…..

METHOD 2
Then I explored &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>CarlosTseng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T01:58:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1492">
    <title>Re: How to convert a list of MNI coordinates (text file based) to an ROI</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1492</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
I wanted to update that the suggestion worked! I only needed to add another
code line in the maroi_pointlist.m to round the coordinates before they're
being checked for integers so that it'll succeed.
Thanks!
Sharon Gilaie-Dotan

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan &amp;lt;shagido&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote:



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sharon Gilaie-Dotan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T19:55:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1491">
    <title>Re: How to convert a list of MNI coordinates (text file based) to an ROI</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1491</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Matthew hi,
thanks. yes the list of coordinates are integers and they are from a  1mm
spaced space.
i will try your solution and update if it works.
Best wishes and thanks again
Sharon
On Apr 19, 2012 9:33 AM, "Matthew Brett" &amp;lt;matthew.brett&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2_______________________________________________
Marsbar-users mailing list
Marsbar-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/marsbar-users
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sharon Gilaie-Dotan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T06:42:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1490">
    <title>Re: How to convert a list of MNI coordinates (text file based) to an ROI</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1490</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Sharon Gilaie-Dotan &amp;lt;shagido&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

Thanks for posting.

This might be a little difficult.  Do you happen to know if the MNI
coordinates are from voxels?  I mean, are they integers?  Are they
exactly 2mm apart or 1mm apart at closest?

The trick will be to read them into a matlab array with something like:

vals = spm_load('my_coordinates.txt');

And then you need an affine matrix from an example MNI image:

pth = spm('dir');
fname = fullfile(pth, 'templates', 'T1.nii');
affine = spm_get_space(fname);

Then something like:

params = struct('XYZ', vals', 'mat', affine); % note vals' should be 3 by N
roi = maroi_pointlist(params, 'mm');
saveroi(roi, 'my_roi.mat');

That might work (I haven't tested it)...

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http:/&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T06:33:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1489">
    <title>How to convert a list of MNI coordinates (text filebased) to an ROI</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1489</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have a list of coordinates in MNI space (loads of them) that are listed
in a long text file (x y z format) which I would like to define as an ROI
in order to sample data with MarsBar. So for example 1000 points listed in
a file should be created as one ROI. What would be the most straight
forward way to do this?
Thanks,
Sharon

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sharon Gilaie-Dotan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T05:16:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1488">
    <title>(no subject)</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1488</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
 http://techproindia.in/wp-content/themes/thematic/rofmd.html?ase=wc.php&amp;amp;jkp=fe.php&amp;amp;fry=koqb       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2_______________________________________________
Marsbar-users mailing list
Marsbar-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/marsbar-users
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mac Shine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-08T14:06:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1487">
    <title>Re: raw vs. standardized % BOLD signal change</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1487</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Chaleece Sandberg &amp;lt;challysand&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

Sorry to take so long to reply.  I think the authors there are just
referring to the use of effect sizes that aren't divided by their
standard deviation.   In the SPM and marsbar these would be the 'beta'
or 'contrast' values.   Also the marsbar percent signal change is raw
rather than standardized in that sense,

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T19:31:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1486">
    <title>Re: AAL ROI match dimensions to fMRI</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1486</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Su, Merina &amp;lt;merina.su.10&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ucl.ac.uk&amp;gt; wrote:

I'm afraid you'd have to take the ROIs, export them as images, apply
the normalization parameters to the images, then re-import them.

I wouldn't do that though - you can just use the ROIs as they are;
marsbar will deal with the differences in voxel size.


The explicit mask just stops SPM analyzing anything outside the ROI.
You'll get SPM results (t maps etc) for just the voxels in the ROI.
The extract data option gets the raw data out of the ROI for you to
play with, and doesn't do any statistics on the data.

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T19:24:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1485">
    <title>Re: stats table and % change question</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar/1485</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Jessica Wojtalik &amp;lt;jesswojo1&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

Sorry for the slow reply, thanks for the nice words.


Yes, exactly.


Yes, if that's your only test, it would be reasonable to use 0.05 as a
threshold.


I wasn't sure what you were trying to test?


It would be 40 if you want the percent signal change during the block
compared to rest.

I hope that's useful, sorry again for the slow reply,

Best,

Matthew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Brett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T19:20:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.graphics.spm.marsbar</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

