gmane.comp.cms.nuxeo.general

contents and blobs

Krawetz, Bruce M — 2008-08-29T20:08:15

_______________________________________________ ECM mailing list ECM-FQDHc1wsLCVb90+sfpvX0g< at >public.gmane.org http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm

Re: New Nuxeo SQL storage backend

Stefane Fermigier — 2008-08-29T16:01:12

On Aug 29, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Michael Santy wrote: Not yet. We will do this someday, of course. In the meantime, third- party benchmarks are welcome. S. Stefane Fermigier, CEO, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) New! Nuxeo TV on http://nuxeo.blip.tv/ Web: http://www.nuxeo.com/ - Tel: +33 1 40 33 79 87

Re: New Nuxeo SQL storage backend

Michael Santy — 2008-08-29T15:31:56

Sounds like this will be very useful. Have there been any performance studies comparing this to the jackrabbit-based backend communicating with the same database vendor? Thanks, Mike On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 16:58 +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:

Brazilian Portuguese Translation

Leandro Reis — 2008-08-29T15:20:31

_______________________________________________ ECM mailing list ECM-FQDHc1wsLCVb90+sfpvX0g< at >public.gmane.org http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm

Location of files

Leandro Reis — 2008-08-29T15:16:59

_______________________________________________ ECM mailing list ECM-FQDHc1wsLCVb90+sfpvX0g< at >public.gmane.org http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm

New Nuxeo SQL storage backend

Florent Guillaume — 2008-08-29T14:58:42

Hi, We're proud to announce Nuxeo SQL Storage backend, a new storage backend that can be used instead of the standard Jackrabbit-based one to store your Nuxeo EP documents. This storage allows you to have clearly visible data in standard SQL tables, which is invaluable for: - bulk import/export, - schema migration, - statistics gathering, - backups, - debugging. This storage backend is designed to plug itself into the current development version of Nuxeo 5.1.6 or Nuxeo 5.2, and doesn't require any change to your application. It's also possible to apply it to a standard 5.1.5 if you follow the instructions to download backported versions of two additional Jars. To build this backend, fetch the current development Nuxeo sources from Mercurial, and build nuxeo-core-storage-sql and nuxeo-core- storage-sql-ra. For convenience, pre-built versions of these jar have been attached to http://jira.nuxeo.org/browse/NXP-2514 To do the installation, follow the instructions in the README to replace

Re: Jackrabbit 1.4

Julien CARSIQUE — 2008-08-29T14:46:28

Hello, Using improvements from a development branch requires some work on code. Assuming you've read the Nuxeo developers documentation about using Mercurial and Maven. You have to retrieve from mercurial nuxeo-core#5.2, merge nuxeo-core#jackrabbit_1.4 on it and then produce artifacts that will replace 5.2 default ones : hg pull http://hg.nuxeo.org/nuxeo/nuxeo-core cd nuxeo-core hg up -C 5.2 hg merge jackrabbit_1.4 # hope there is no conflicts (there shouldn't be too much thanks to mercurial) mvn clean install You can then use the jars built in target/ directories to replace the default ones. Or you may use nuxeo-platform-ear module that allow to package a new nuxeo.ear using maven artifacts locally installed. Warning : this branch is still in development, so there's no guarantee it will be buildable, neither ready to work but it should :-) Feel free to do some tests on it. Cheers, Julien. Chris Pioli a écrit :

Re: Build nuxeo shell ...

Julien CARSIQUE — 2008-08-29T10:37:38

Hello, You miss a settings.xml file giving maven our repositories location. Take this one : http://hg.nuxeo.org/nuxeo/file/ff5fe0cf6fe1/settings.xml jiveforums-ecm-CQNGlVZ5l00AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org a écrit :

Re: Is NUXEO-EP-5.1.5 JAVA6 certified

Florent Guillaume — 2008-08-29T10:09:40

It's not "certified", note however that Nuxeo 5.1.5 works quite well with Java 6, and is faster than with Java 5. I do most of my developments on Mac OS X with Java 6. Florent On 18 Aug 2008, at 11:06, Olivier Adam wrote:

Re: Differnce between Workspaces and Folder when blockin inherited rights?

2008-08-29T11:43:16

Post 3

Re: Differnce between Workspaces and Folder when blockin inherited rights?

2008-08-29T10:01:07

I think I found the problem. The datatype extending folder had no content template and that one extending workspace had a content template with a default ACL. It seems that the ACL of the content template is applied after my listener already set an ACL. Now I am setting up all permissions via a listener and not using the content template way to set up ACLs anymore - everything works.

Re: Differnce between Workspaces and Folder when blockin inherited rights?

Olivier Grisel — 2008-08-29T07:34:31

jiveforums-ecm< at >nuxeo.com a écrit : The permission system is not affected by datatypes so your code should work with any document type. What error/misbehavior do you get?

Differnce between Workspaces and Folder when blockin inherited rights?

2008-08-28T23:04:09

Hi, I am trying to block the inherited rights of a few document types upon creation. I created Eventlisteners for this purpose that set up the rights. One document type extends folder, one extends workspace. The following method should block the inherited rights: private void setupRights(DocumentModel doc, CoreSession documentManager) { ACP myACP = doc.getACP(); ACL[] myACLs = myACP.getACLs(); for( ACL myACL : myACLs ) { myACL.clear(); myACP.removeACL(myACL.getName()); } // Automatically creates a local ACL ACL newACL = new ACLImpl(); newACL.add(new ACE("administrators","Everything", true)); newACL.add(new ACE("Administrator","Everything", true)); newACL.add(new ACE(SecurityConstants.EVERYONE, SecurityConstants.EVERYTHING, false)); myACP.addACL(newACL); try { documentManager.setACP(doc.getRef(), myACP, true); documentManager.save(); } catch( ClientException e ) { log.info(e.toString()); } } This works for the folder, however it does not

WebEngine App Action Isolation

2008-08-28T06:36:12

_______________________________________________ ECM mailing list ECM-FQDHc1wsLCVb90+sfpvX0g< at >public.gmane.org http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm

Re: Build nuxeo shell ...

Stefane Fermigier — 2008-08-27T19:24:00

Works for me (branch 5.2, from Mercurial). Where did you get the sources from ? S. On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:40 PM, jiveforums-ecm-CQNGlVZ5l00AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org wrote: Stefane Fermigier, CEO, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) New! Nuxeo TV on http://nuxeo.blip.tv/ Web: http://www.nuxeo.com/ - Tel: +33 1 40 33 79 87

Build nuxeo shell ...

2008-08-27T20:40:05

While trying to using mvn to build the shell, If I type: mvn install I get the following error: mvn install [INFO] Scanning for projects... Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/nuxeo/ecm/platform/nuxeo-shell-parent/5.2.0.m1/nuxeo-shell-parent-5.2.0.m1.pom [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. GroupId: org.nuxeo.ecm.platform ArtifactId: nuxeo-shell-parent Version: 5.2.0.m1 Reason: Unable to download the artifact from any repository Has the repository moved? Or what?? This worked before.

Re: Is NUXEO-EP-5.1.5 JAVA6 certified

Stefane Fermigier — 2008-08-27T15:43:55

Hi Michael, We will work on task triage and a release plan for Nuxeo 5.2 next week when everybody will be back from vacation, and announce an updated roadmap. S. On Aug 27, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Michael Santy wrote: Stefane Fermigier, CEO, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) New! Nuxeo TV on http://nuxeo.blip.tv/ Web: http://www.nuxeo.com/ - Tel: +33 1 40 33 79 87

Re: Is NUXEO-EP-5.1.5 JAVA6 certified

Michael Santy — 2008-08-27T15:19:58

Thanks Stephan, I was wondering the same thing. Is there any chance that someone can triage the Jira issues slated for inclusion for 5.2? I'm assuming (maybe incorrectly) that ~240 issues won't be fixed in two months. Thanks, Mike On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:11 +0200, Stefane Fermigier wrote:

Re: Is NUXEO-EP-5.1.5 JAVA6 certified

Stefane Fermigier — 2008-08-27T15:11:17

On Aug 18, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Olivier Adam wrote: JBoss 4.0, which is the application server used by Nuxeo EP 5.1, is not Java 6 certified. The current development branch of Nuxeo EP, Nuxeo EP 5.2, currently uses JBoss 4.2.3. According to the release notes from JBoss: "A secondary target for this release was to improve support for Java 6. JBossAS 4.2.3.GA can be build with both JDK5 and JDK6. The JDK5 compiled binaries have undergone more rigorous testing, they constitute our certified version and can run under both Java 5 & 6 VMs (with a few configuration changes for JDK6). The JDK6 compiled binaries include support for the JDBC 4 APIs, but this should be considered experimental at this point." Of course, Nuxeo 5.2 is still in active development and can't be considered "certified" until it goes GA in a couple of months. S. Stefane Fermigier, CEO, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) New! Nuxeo TV on http://nuxeo.blip.tv/ Web: http://www.nuxeo.co

Re: Nuxeo & LDAP

Olivier Grisel — 2008-08-27T13:37:16

Vincent a écrit : Yes the current implementation of the LDAPReference class only resolve entries identified by full DNs and not just ids. To add ids support you'll have to hack around the reference implementations, either by adding support for ids to the LDAPReference class or by implementing a new IdReference implementation of the Reference interface (maybe IdReference is not the best name candidate for such a class though). No idea, in the default Nuxeo setup both users and groups are searched on the rights management tab... A debugger session is probably needed to find the cause of your problem on your setup.

Re: Nuexo 5 & Active Directory

Olivier Grisel — 2008-08-27T13:27:21

jiveforums-ecm< at >nuxeo.com a écrit : Ok, according to your LDIF file the users' entries hold the list of the DNs of group entries they belong to which is the opposite of the standard groupOfUniqueNames scheme. Hence you should make the "groups" field of the userDirectory hold the the "ldapReference" to resolve those DNs while the "members" field of the groupDirectory should be resolved by an inverseReference pointing to the previously mentioned ldapReference.