<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general">
    <title>gmane.linux.swsusp.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8068"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8067"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8066"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8065"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8064"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8063"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8062"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8061"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8060"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8059"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8058"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8057"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8052"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8051"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8049"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8048"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8047"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8046"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8045"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8044"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8068">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8068</link>
    <description>Hi,


It says "Powering Down".


I don't know if this is of any help, but both "/sbin/shutdown -h now" and 
"/sbin/poweroff" work fine.

I also tried swsusp again to confirm, and it too reboots instead of shutting 
down. maybe it is something 2.6.27 related?

Regards,
Bartek Cwiklowski
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bartek Ćwikłowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T01:44:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8067">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8067</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 01:35 +0100, Bartek Ćwikłowski wrote:

Okay. That's not really unfortunate - it just shows that the issue is
something else. Are you using a userui? If so, would you try enabling
pausing between steps (press 'P' while hibernating). Then, when you get
to the end of writing an image, please check that it says "Powering
down." and not "Ready to reboot". Then we'll be completely sure it's not
deliberately rebooting.

After that, I'd check the powerdown method so we can know how it's
trying to power down.

Regards,

Nigel

_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T00:50:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8066">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8066</link>
    <description>Hello,


unfortunately, before and after hibernate command (2 attempts), 
/sys/power/tuxonice/reboot contains 0.

Regards,
Bartek Cwiklowski
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bartek Ćwikłowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T00:35:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8065">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8065</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 18:18 +0100, Bartek Ćwikłowski wrote:

Okay. Thanks.


I wonder if the reboot option is getting reset. After trying a cycle in
which you don't want the system to reboot, would you please
cat /sys/power/tuxonice/reboot?

If it returns 1, try echoing (as root) 0 into that file before giving it
another try.

Regards,

Nigel

_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:31:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8064">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8064</link>
    <description>Hi Nigel,


I meant hibernate without "-r" argument.


swsusp shutdowns my machine successfully, but it cannot reboot it after 
suspending (it doesn't have that setting), but tuxonice reboots ok, but 
instead of shutting down, it reboots as well.

Regards,
Bartek Cwiklowski
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bartek Ćwikłowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T17:18:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8063">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8063</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 04:53 +0100, Bartek Ćwikłowski wrote:

Good to hear.


I'm not sure what you mean by "regular hibernate" - would you give more
information, please?


swsusp uses platform mode (= powerdownmethod 4) by default. We are
currently defaulting to powerdownmethod 0; I'll change that shortly.


You're welcome.

Regards,

Nigel

_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T06:44:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8062">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8062</link>
    <description>
Hello Nigel,

that powerdownmethod 4 solved my problem.

hibernate -r now works great with 2.6.27 and tuxonice-current, however regular 
hibernate (that should shutdown my machine) instead of shutting it down, 
reboots just like "-r". The only difference is, that my hdd spins down and 
immediately starts again (suspend and resume works great though). can you 
tell me how to fix it, or at least how do you start that S4 thingie, so I can 
google/experiment on my own, without risking my data on disk (I usually test 
things with booting from network, with hdd disconnected).

I would also like to know why it worked with 2.6.24 and with swsusp.

thanks for your help

Bartek Cwiklowski

PS. sorry for first mail sent from another email account - I'm still not 
paying enough attention.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bartek Ćwikłowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T03:53:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8061">
    <title>Re: forced shutdown of UPS after RAM contents are saved?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8061</link>
    <description>Hi again.

On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 12:52 +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote:

Okay... more explanation follows.

Regards,

Nigel

1. Keep Image Mode.

The first thing to do is prepare a kernel that has TuxOnIce's keep image
mode enabled. We'll use this below to allow you to hibernate our special
'power down the UPS' initrd/ramfs once, then resume it over and over to
do the actual powering down.

2. Storage of the images.

You need to two places to store images. One will need the normal amount
of storage that you'd use for an image, and the other can be quite small
(say 20 meg). It will probably be simplest to make the small one a
partition.

3. Image for powering off the UPS.

You want to make an initrd which does nothing more than power down the
UPS to begin with. It must not mount any filesystems, but should instead
have all the libraries and binaries needed included in the
initrd/initramfs filesystem.

Once you get it things to the point where booting with that initrd/ramfs
image causes the UPS to power off, you can then add commands to the
initrd/ramfs to hibernate using the small storage area just prior to
doing the poweroff. The commands should include echoing 1
that this hibernation image can be reused. If you then boot a few times
using this initrd/ramfs, the computer should hibernate the first time,
and then the second and subsequent times should resume and do the
powerdown (because it carries on from where you did the hibernate and
doesn't remove the image).

Once this is all set up, you should be right to boot like normal (using
a different initrd/ramfs that has its resume= pointing at the big
storage area. When you want to hibernate and power off the UPS, you
would set things up as per a normal hibernate, and in addition
set /sys/power/tuxonice/alt_resume_param to be the resume= that you used
for the small storage area (for the powering-off-the-UPS image).

What will then happen is that TuxOnIce will write your image like
normal. Then, instead of powering off the computer immediately, it will
load the image from the small storage area and continue at the commands
to powerdown the UPS (like in the second and subsequent boots above).
The net effect will thus be that you'll hibernate like usual, then the
UPS will be powered off.

To resume, just boot your normal image in the usual way.

If you upgrade your kernel, you'll need - at the moment - to boot the
UPS powering off image with noresume to get it to regenerate the
hibernation image. We should be able to have different kernel versions
work together, but I don't yet have that going right.

Hope this is clear and helpful!

Nigel

_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T21:53:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8060">
    <title>Re: forced shutdown of UPS after RAM contents aresaved?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8060</link>
    <description>
Yes, I am interested! So you mean, I can load some different image and use 
those ups programs which are on main OS filesystem? Would be better, of 
course, just the problem of unmounting /. So, maybe I didn't understood 
right.
Some more explanation is welcome!


Kārlis
_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Kārlis Repsons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T12:52:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8059">
    <title>Re: forced shutdown of UPS after RAM contents are saved?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8059</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 10:29 +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote:

The only solution I know of is to use TuxOnIce's alternate image
feature. It lets you write the image like normal, and then resume from a
different image instead of powering down. If you created an initrd or
initramfs that didn't included commands to hibernate to this separate
location and then power off the UPS, you could use it to achieve what
you're after. I'm a bit rushed at the moment, but could tell you more
tomorrow morning if you're interested.

Regards,

Nigel

_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T20:39:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8058">
    <title>forced shutdown of UPS after RAM contents aresaved?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8058</link>
    <description>Though I'm using swsusp, I think, someone in this list might know: 
how to call my UPS forced shutdown command, which cause power loss, right 
after RAM is saved, but system still up?
</description>
    <dc:creator>Kārlis Repsons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T10:29:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8057">
    <title>Re: problematic resume with opened flashplayer</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8057</link>
    <description>Hi Laurento.

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 14:54 +0100, Laurento Frittella wrote:

A couple of questions:
- What video card and driver are you using?
- What extra pages allowance have you set?

Would you also send your dmesg from when it runs slowly?

Thanks!

Nigel
</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-28T02:51:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8052">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8052</link>
    <description>Hi Bartek.

Just in case you haven't seen the developments, would you please try
(in /etc/hibernate/suspend2.conf):

powerdownmethod 4
procsetting extra_pages_allowance 2000

(In place of any existing values).

Regards,

Nigel
</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T20:32:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8051">
    <title>Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] NVidia + TuxOnIce hang:solved?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8051</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Dmitry Nezhevenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T14:38:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8049">
    <title>Re: nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8049</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Dmitry Nezhevenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T20:31:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8048">
    <title>nvidia-legacy and &gt;=2.6.25</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8048</link>
    <description>I have an old gf4 mx 440 with legacy drivers version 96.43.07.
hibernation is working great with tuxonice on kernel 2.6.24. After
applying tricks from
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1526965&amp;postcount=2 I
get to hibernate succesfully even with agp working. however I can't do
that with 2.6.2[567] kernels. s2disk with swsusp works great with all
kernels but I don't like it and I prefer tuxonice. here are the
symptoms from 2.6.25 failures (26 and 27 kernels fail similar with
2.6.24 config, I didn't bother without X or rmmodding):

1)normal setup that works under 2.6.24 after "doing atomic copy"
turns off monitor and hangs, I can only ping my machine and use magic
sysrq.
2)unpatched drivers (which results in no agp) - results in the same situation.
3)X server is shutdown, hibernation succeeds, but fails to resume -
hang on "suspending consoles". again only ping and sysrq work
4)X server is shutdown AND nvidia module rmmoded - hibernation works fine.
5)system is hibernated and resumed using s2disk, after resume I
remove swsusp initrd and tuxonice's hibernation works just once.
subsequent hibernation cycles fail as usual.

it doesn't look like hardware problem since it works with swsusp
tuxonice version is 3.0-rc7 for 24-26 kernels, for 27 I used "current"
patch. 27 was also using beta drivers 96.43.09 (with and without agp
patch/trick). I tried nohz=off trick and it didn't help (and it still
works with nohz on in 24 or swsusp)

thanks in advance.
Bartek Cwiklowski

P.S. sorry Nigel for posting it in the wrong list earlier, apparently
I must pay more attention.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bartek Ćwikłowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T21:15:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8047">
    <title>problematic resume with opened flashplayer</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8047</link>
    <description>Hi all,
I noticed that using the latest sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.27 on
gentoo (so ToI v3.0-rc7) I have problems with xorg (maybe firefox) when
I suspend with firefox opened and one or more flash pages loaded (I mean
an html page with some flash in it... like youtube).
After resume the system becomes unusable (veeeeery slow, Xorg and
firefox eat all the CPU and the pointer moves one step a minute) and I
need to switch to a tty and restart gdm (in practice killing all user
processes).

If I close all the flash pages before suspend all works well.

Any idea?

Regards,
Laurento
</description>
    <dc:creator>Laurento Frittella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T13:54:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8046">
    <title>Re: tuxonice and nvidia - still stuck</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8046</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 08:49 +0200, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:

Okay; thanks. That's one more aspect ruled out. I'll make a patch for
testing step by step as soon as I can find the time - which might be a
week or two at the moment.

Regards,

Nigel
</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-20T21:40:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8045">
    <title>Re: tuxonice and nvidia - still stuck</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8045</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Dmitry Nezhevenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-20T06:49:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8044">
    <title>Re: tuxonice and nvidia - still stuck</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8044</link>
    <description>Hi.

On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 23:45 +0200, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:

Okay. Must be a TuxOnIce problem then. Now, how to find it...


No, that's just due to our difference methods of saving the image. You
could try

echo 1 &gt; /sys/power/tuxonice/no_pageset2

Then TuxOnIce will save the whole image in one part (and save 1/2 of
memory at most). I doubt that will make TuxOnIce suddenly start working,
but I might be wrong. Would you give it a try?

Regards,

Nigel
</description>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Cunningham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T21:57:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8043">
    <title>Re: tuxonice and nvidia - still stuck</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.swsusp.general/8043</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
TuxOnIce-users mailing list
TuxOnIce-users&lt; at &gt;lists.tuxonice.net
http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-users</description>
    <dc:creator>Dmitry Nezhevenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T21:45:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.swsusp.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.swsusp.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
