<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing">
    <title>gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8298"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8297"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8296"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8295"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8294"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8293"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8292"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8291"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8290"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8289"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8288"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8287"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8286"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8285"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8284"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8283"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8282"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8281"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8280"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8279"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8298">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8298</link>
    <description>2008/12/1 Paul W. Frields &lt;stickster&lt; at &gt;gmail.com&gt;:

Are you referring to this?

http://jonrob.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/10-reasons-youll-love-fedora-10/

Doesn't mention artwork at all. So I'm still confused.  Is it worth
slogging into his article's comment section and ask for him to clarify
where he got that ten item list? I'm not sure it is.

-jef

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Spaleta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T01:14:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8297">
    <title>Fedora distributed on public places...</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8297</link>
    <description>Hi,
we would like to put Fedora in more and more hands. We have the will
to do it in our home town (Osijek, Croatia) and have some spare cache
to put into blank CD/DVD's and burn them. One thing we lack is some
representative box to put Fedora discs into. We would like to put
these Fedora boxes on public places like student cafeteria, pubs, pc
hardware shops, etc... It would be nice that there would be some text
on the box "It's Free - take one".

I saw request for "AmbassadorKit Box " on this page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService
There are examples of Ubuntu. We would LOVE to have something similar
- or even better than Ubuntu ;)

Cheers,
Valent.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Valent Turkovic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:21:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8296">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8296</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Paul W. Frields</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:56:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8295">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8295</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Robyn Bergeron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:42:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8294">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8294</link>
    <description>
Here's my 1023-liner response:

Where did he see improved artwork as a "feature"?  He doesn't
reference any of our own materials. I'm not sure where he's getting
his 10 point featurelist from actually.  It doesn't correlate with our
F10 Feature wikipage nor with the release notes as far as I can see.
If he's read in some of our press materials that the release thematic
artwork is a "feature" that's probably something we should avoid
doing.  If we are going to have a featuring process, then we should
try real hard to draw from that feature list in press material.  But I
can't find where we made that sort of oopsie.

I'm not saying that artwork isn't important, in my mind our release
artwork creations are akin to album cover artwork you find on really
good concept albums (though that analogy maybe out-dated in the new
age of digital music.)  I wouldn't call the Beatle's album cover
artwork "features" of the album, but at the same time I wouldn't be
real thrilled if all the albums were incrementally polished version of
the Abbey Road or White Album covers.

I'm just saying that we should be clear and consistent about
terminology. If we are going to talk about features at release time
then we should try to make sure we stick to the ones that go through
the feature process.  And that may mean we make sure we find a way to
talk about artwork as something different.  It could be that we aren't
talking about the artwork process enough, and people are just lumping
it in with features because we haven't given them a mental framework
on which to hang their opinionated window dressing about our artwork.

So if the core ideal behind our artwork process is Máirí­n's one-liner
above... that its an expression of the believe that free(libre) media
content matters... how do we better communicate that in a way that
doesn't get confused with our featuring process?

I think we really have to find a way to ween operating system
"reviewers" from talking about artwork in the same context as they
talk about boot speed.   The 'free media content matters' discussion
is worth having.. and the ' os reviewer' soapbox stadium may not be
equipped to have it.  How do we get people talking about our artwork
process in more useful way? People who care about supporting and
creating collaborative media but don't care so much about technical
bits of throwing a linux distribution together?

-jef

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Spaleta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:30:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8293">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8293</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Larry Cafiero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:07:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8292">
    <title>Re: Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8292</link>
    <description>
My one-liner response would be: "It's not just about *software* freedom, 
but using that free software to produce free media."

~m

</description>
    <dc:creator>Máirí­n Duffy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T16:04:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8291">
    <title>Red Hat's Max Spevack On Defending Linux Freedom</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8291</link>
    <description>Hi,

http://www.techradar.com/news/computing/defending-the-flame-of-linux-freedom-483915

"LXF: Was it the community side or the technical side that attracted you 
more?

MS: If I'm going to honest about myself I'd have to say that I was a 
decent programmer, not a superstar programmer. Even in college there 
were people who just loved to write code for hours and hours and hours, 
and those were the best programmers. I liked it and was good enough at 
it to get good grades, but it wasn't an all-consuming passion for me.

I always kind of thought that I would be in a technical company but in a 
managerial, a leadership type of role, so looking back it doesn't 
necessarily surprise me that this is the job I've ended up in. I live in 
awe of our brilliant engineers and the things they can do. "

Slashdot:

http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/23/1349227

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T15:07:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8290">
    <title>Review: Fedora 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8290</link>
    <description>Hi,


http://reddevil62-techhead.blogspot.com/2008/11/review-fedora-10.html

"I am generally very impressed with F10: It is certainly a faster 
distribution than ever before and I appreciate the new, improved 
PulseAudio. More than anything, however, F10 is a distribution that just 
feels right, a feeling that comes from the sum of many different parts 
which have been well chosen, well-implemented and improved where necessary.

If you are an experienced Linux user, F10 is well worth spending some 
time with just for its sheer rounded-out quality; new users, once they 
get their heads around that multimedia issue, might also find a lot to 
admire in this excellent release."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T15:07:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8289">
    <title>Fedora 10 is a 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8289</link>
    <description>Hi,

Apparently, artwork is considered a waste of time by this user. A 
response is in order.

http://www.daniweb.com/blogs/entry3592.html

"Ok, I think they're grasping a bit with some of those to get to 10 new 
and improved features but I'll allow it since Fedora 10 impressed me as 
much has it did.

But, I won't let them get away with "prettying" features like new 
artwork and themes. That has nothing to do with functionality, 
stability, or usability. As far as I'm concerned, that stuff is a grand 
waste of time for a team bent on improving the operating system.

Come on guys, focus here. You're trying to compete with the likes of 
Windows, Mac, and the other Linux distributions. You're on the right 
track with improved support for WebCams, video cards, and making 
software management easier and more intelligent--keep your eyes on the 
goal of making those kinds of improvements."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T15:06:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8288">
    <title>A Visual Desktop Tour of 10 Fedora Releases</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8288</link>
    <description>Hi,

Interesting to look back at the changes

http://www.junauza.com/2008/11/visual-desktop-tour-of-10-fedora.html

"A Visual Desktop Tour of 10 Fedora Releases

Fedora is without doubt one of the most prolific Linux distributions 
around. In the span of only 5 years, the Fedora Project has already 
unleashed 10 major versions of Fedora.

Let's take a trip down memory lane and have a visual desktop tour of 
this wonderful distro starting from its inaugural version that was 
released on November 6, 2003 until its most recent version that was out 
just a few days ago."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T11:14:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8287">
    <title>An Ubuntu User Takes Fedora 10 for a Test Drive</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8287</link>
    <description>Hi,


If someone has the time, go through this fairly detailed critical review 
and help point out issues or file bug reports on the user's behalf when 
it is possible. A good polite response would be helpful.

http://linuxcanuck.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/an-ubuntu-user-takes-fedora-10-for-a-test-drive/

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T11:12:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8286">
    <title>What's new in Fedora 10</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8286</link>
    <description>Hi,


A detailed review of Fedora 10.

This is general is referring to "setting the standard"

http://www.heise-online.co.uk/open/What-s-new-in-Fedora-10--/features/112093

"Fedora 10 – version name "Cambridge" – includes state-of-the-art 
components and offers many new features that are likely to be 
incorporated into other distributions in the near future."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T11:07:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8285">
    <title>Fedora 10 proves infrastructure matter</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8285</link>
    <description>Hi,

http://www.linux.com/feature/154253

"Except for the codec advisor, little in Fedora 10 is radically new. 
However, if you imagine that means the release has nothing to offer, you 
are wrong. Improvements to infrastructure may not immediately capture 
the imagination, but fixing and streamlining subsystems and laying the 
groundwork for future improvements soon adds up. Users may overlook a 
single new feature any time they aren't using it, but basic improvements 
are obvious all the time, and Fedora 10 has so many that you can't help 
noticing the improvements constantly.

Fedora 10 is the first release of any distribution in a long time that 
has actually felt like an upgrade to me. With more hardware detected, 
increased performance, and improved interfaces, Fedora 10 is an 
unusually strong release, with tantalizing hints of even better to come."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T11:05:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8284">
    <title>Proprietary Firmware and the Pursuit of a Free Kernel</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8284</link>
    <description>Hi

In Fedora 10, there is a kernel-firmware package so you can exclude 
*-firmware in yum.conf if you are concerned about this. The work is 
close to getting completed.

http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3787736_1

"According to Woodhouse, such solutions are in keeping with the modern 
kernel practice of removing firmware from the kernel. New drivers 
already follow this practice, and old ones are being rewritten to follow 
it in what he calls largely routine "janitorial work to bring drivers up 
to date with how we do things these days."

"There are plenty of technical reasons why it's better to do that," 
Woodhouse says. "It's much easier to change firmware and experiment with 
it, and it avoids taking up unswappable kernel memory for something 
which is only required occasionally."

Rahul

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T11:04:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8283">
    <title>Re: Hello to all....</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8283</link>
    <description>2008/11/30 Naresh KN &lt;nareshlx&lt; at &gt;fedoraproject.org&gt;:

Hi Udit,

Welcome.
Nice to have you with us.

Please make sure you subscribe to the fedora-india list
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
this is where we, Indian contributors discuss things.
Also join us at #fedora-india on irc.

Please let us know your home page url.
And if you need _anything_ please drop a mail on the list. or let me know.

Thanks.

</description>
    <dc:creator>susmit shannigrahi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T11:34:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8282">
    <title>Re: Hello to all....</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8282</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Naresh KN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T11:23:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8281">
    <title>Hello to all....</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8281</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Udit Sharma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T09:02:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8280">
    <title>Re: what is fedora?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8280</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Robyn Bergeron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T17:00:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8279">
    <title>Re: what is fedora?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8279</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Paul W. Frields</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T15:50:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8278">
    <title>Re: what is fedora?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing/8278</link>
    <description>
+1
The best among the answers I have seen/read .... 

I have written this on my blog :
http://satish.playdrupal.com/?q=what_is_fedora

let me know if there is a better place to write this on (may be LWN) or
please digg this : http://digg.com/linux_unix/What_is_FEDORA

Thanks
Satish
</description>
    <dc:creator>satish</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T05:33:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.marketing</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
