gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc

Bug#669603: marked as done (chaksem: unowned file/usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2))

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T12:09:40

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 12:02:09 +0000
with message-id <E1SXtDd-0003R3-Lk< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#669603: fixed in chaksem 1.7b-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669603,
regarding chaksem: unowned file /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#666646: marked as done (chaksem: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File`a4wide.sty' not found.)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T12:08:35

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 12:02:09 +0000
with message-id <E1SXtDd-0003R0-Kr< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#666646: fixed in chaksem 1.7b-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #666646,
regarding chaksem: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `a4wide.sty' not found.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Processed: Re: Bug#673594: ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-allhangs/segfaults

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T11:42:08

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #673594 [src:ruby1.8] ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-all hangs/segfaults
Bug 673594 cloned as bug 674541
674541 was not blocked by any bugs.
674541 was blocking: 645105
Added blocking bug(s) of 674541: 645105
Bug #674541 [src:ruby1.8] ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-all hangs/segfaults
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
Bug #674541 [src:ruby1.8] ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-all hangs/segfaults
Changed Bug title to 'ruby1.8: threaded code segfaults under kfreebsd-*' from 'ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-all hangs/segfaults'
Bug #673594 [src:ruby1.8] ruby1.8: FTBFS[kfreebsd-*]: test-all hangs/segfaults
Added tag(s) pending.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#674517: initscripts: RAMTMP is turned on during upgrades

Roger Leigh — 2012-05-25T10:56:32

We previously didn't enable this for upgrades primarily because it
wasn't possible to.  It wasn't possible to upgrade /etc/default/rcS.
Also, quite a few people complained about the semantics of RAM* in
rcS changing since it used to refer to /var/* rather than the new
locations (mainly from RAMRUN and RAMLOCK).  To address these concerns,
all the RAM* settings were moved to /etc/default/tmpfs, putting all
the tmpfs-related settings in a single place.  However, this does
result in tmpfs being enabled on upgrade.

Whether the default is set to enabled or disabled, we now have a single
place to configure it, which will take effect for upgrades or new
installs.  Having a consistent default for both upgrades and new
installs is, I think, generally desirable, irrespective of what that
default ends up being.

What problems did you experience as a result of the change?


Regards,
Roger

Processed: bug 674380 is forwarded tohttps://github.com/rtomayko/ronn/issues/56

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:54:04

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #674380 [src:ruby-ronn] ruby-ronn: FTBFS: test failed
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/rtomayko/ronn/issues/56'.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#667876: marked as done (zipper.app: FTBFS with GCC-4.7)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:51:04

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 10:48:50 +0000
with message-id <E1SXs4g-000625-MJ< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#667876: fixed in zipper.app 1.3-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667876,
regarding zipper.app: FTBFS with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#674534: gir1.2-dee-1.0: removal of gir1.2-dee-1.0 makes filesdisappear from gir1.2-dee-0.5

Andreas Beckmann — 2012-05-25T10:41:03

Package: gir1.2-dee-1.0
Version: 1.0.10-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa< at >lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks

Hi,

during a test with piuparts and EDOS tools I noticed your package causes
removal of files that also belong to another package.
This is caused by using Replaces without corresponding Breaks.

The installation sequence to reproduce this problem is

  apt-get install gir1.2-dee-0.5
  # (1)
  apt-get install gir1.2-dee-1.0
  apt-get remove gir1.2-dee-1.0
  # (2)

The list of installed files at points (1) and (2) should be identical,
but the following files have disappeared:

  /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gi/overrides/Dee.py
  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gi/overrides/Dee.py

This is a serious bug violating policy 7.6, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
and also see the footnote that describes this incorrect behavior
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html#f53

The gir1.2-dee-1.0 package has the following relationships with gir1.2-dee-0.5:

  Conflicts: n/a
  Breaks:    n/a
  Replaces:  gir1.2-dee-0.5


0m25.1s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared:
  /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gi/overrides/Dee.py -> ../../../../../share/pyshared/gi/overrides/Dee.py      owned by: gir1.2-dee-1.0
  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gi/overrides/Dee.py -> ../../../../../share/pyshared/gi/overrides/Dee.py      owned by: gir1.2-dee-1.0
  /usr/share/pyshared/gi/overrides/Dee.py        owned by: gir1.2-dee-1.0

0m25.1s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified:
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/gir1.2-dee-0.5.list         not owned


cheers,

Andreas

Bug#673802: marked as done (gnunet-gtk: fails to upgrade from'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/gnunet-setup)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:19:58

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:30 +0000
with message-id <E1SXraM-0001h5-40< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#673802: fixed in gnunet-gtk 0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #673802,
regarding gnunet-gtk: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/gnunet-setup
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#673801: marked as done (gnunet-server: fails to upgrade from'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/gnunet-vpn)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:19:48

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:16 +0000
with message-id <E1SXra8-0001eZ-4z< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#673801: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #673801,
regarding gnunet-server: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/gnunet-vpn
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#673382: marked as done (gnunet-server and gnunet-fuse: errorwhen trying to install together)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:19:39

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:16 +0000
with message-id <E1SXra8-0001eV-46< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#673382: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #673382,
regarding gnunet-server and gnunet-fuse: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#673942: libreoffice: LibreOffice repeatedly freezes whole system

Rene Engelhard — 2012-05-25T10:02:12

Juergen, please confirm that 3.5.3 works. Then this should be closed. Miroslaw already said everything about 3.4.6 status cirrectly .

P.s. miroslaw nnn< at >bugs.debian.org do NOT go to the submitter...

Processed: found 672256 in 5.1.1-7, found 661402 in 3.40-0.1, found661471 in 3.4.2-1, affects 674528 ...

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:03:26

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #672256 [gforge-db-postgresql] gforge-db-postgresql: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /etc/postgresql/9.1/main/pg_hba.conf.ucf-old
Marked as found in versions fusionforge/5.1.1-7.
Bug #661402 [manpages-dev] manpages-dev: removal of manpages-dev makes files disappear from libaio-dev
Marked as found in versions manpages/3.40-0.1.
Bug #661471 [gnome-themes-standard] gnome-themes-standard: removal of gnome-themes-standard makes files disappear from gnome-accessibility-themes
Marked as found in versions gnome-themes-standard/3.4.2-1.
Bug #674528 [freebsd-glue] freebsd-glue: removal of freebsd-glue makes files disappear from freebsd-buildutils
Added indication that 674528 affects freebsd-buildutils
Bug #673382 [gnunet-fuse,gnunet-server] gnunet-server and gnunet-fuse: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions gnunet-fuse/0.8.0c-7.
Bug #673382 [gnunet-fuse,gnunet-server] gnunet-server and gnunet-fuse: error when trying to install together
The source gnunet-server and version 0.9.2-1 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions gnunet-server/0.9.2-1.
Bug #673738 [ruby-dust,ruby-validatable] ruby-validatable and ruby-dust: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions ruby-dust/0.1.7-2.
Bug #673738 [ruby-dust,ruby-validatable] ruby-validatable and ruby-dust: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions ruby-validatable/1.6.7-7.
Bug #674204 [libjetty-java-doc,libjetty8-java-doc] libjetty8-java-doc and libjetty-java-doc: error when trying to install together
The source libjetty-java-doc and version 6.1.26-1 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions libjetty-java-doc/6.1.26-1.
Bug #674204 [libjetty-java-doc,libjetty8-java-doc] libjetty8-java-doc and libjetty-java-doc: error when trying to install together
The source libjetty8-java-doc and version 8.1.3-2 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions libjetty8-java-doc/8.1.3-2.
Bug #673931 [netgen,sumo] sumo and netgen: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions netgen/4.9.13.dfsg-4.
Bug #673931 [netgen,sumo] sumo and netgen: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions sumo/0.15.0~dfsg-1.
Bug #674504 [swift,swift-im] swift-im and swift: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions swift/1.4.8-1.
Bug #674504 [swift,swift-im] swift-im and swift: error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions swift-im/2.0~beta1+dev26-1.
Bug #674117 [libsope-dev] libsope-dev and libgnustep-dl2-dev: error when trying to install together
The source libgnustep-dl2-dev and version 0.12.0-8 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions libgnustep-dl2-dev/0.12.0-8.
Bug #674117 [libsope-dev] libsope-dev and libgnustep-dl2-dev: error when trying to install together
The source libsope-dev and version 1.3.14-1 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions libsope-dev/1.3.14-1.
Bug #674117 [libsope-dev] libsope-dev and libgnustep-dl2-dev: error when trying to install together
Added indication that 674117 affects libgnustep-dl2-dev
Bug #672176 [linux-container] leaves uptime diversion after removal
Added indication that 672176 affects procps
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#673469: libwebkitgtk-1.0-0: segfaults all the time on armel,javascript related

Alex Bradbury — 2012-05-25T10:00:19

It looks like this is the relevant upstream bug (though it's not
totally clear if the original reporter is on armel or armhf)

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85076

Alex

Processed: Re: Bug#674354: libreoffice: FTBFS: configure: error:npapi.h headerfile not found

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T10:01:27

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #674354 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice: FTBFS: configure: error: npapi.h header file not found
Added tag(s) pending.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#674354: libreoffice: FTBFS: configure: error: npapi.h headerfile not found

Rene Engelhard — 2012-05-25T09:56:36

tag 674354 + pending
thanks

Hi.

Yes. Known and already fixes. All builds failed the same...

Configure option needlessly called.

At linuxtag right now so only can upload sat/sun...

Regards,

Rene

Bug#673968: marked as done (gplanarity: does not start, complainingsomewhere fontconfig-related)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T09:51:20

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 09:47:30 +0000
with message-id <E1SXr7K-0003Ot-Q2< at >franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#673968: fixed in gplanarity 17906-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #673968,
regarding gplanarity: does not start, complaining somewhere fontconfig-related
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#283173: w3c-sgml-lib vs w3-dtd-mathml

Vincent Lefevre — 2012-05-25T09:41:26

This would be confusing for the user, because w3-dtd-mathml is mainly
XML (that's why the contents are under /usr/share/xml), possibly with
SGML compatibility, while the name of w3c-sgml-lib suggests that it's
about SGML only. A name w3c-xml-sgml-lib might be better.

And what about the status of w3c-dtd-xhtml?

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

Jon Dowland — 2012-05-25T09:36:50

Hi Cyril,

Sorry yes. (I wish I had a better bug workflow. Stuff like this keeps getting
lost. Kind of ironic given the package.)

OK being realistic, I haven't devoted any time to this program in a long while.
There are a number of transitions that the package needs, not just on the Debian
side but also GTK2â3, glade â gtkbuilder, and no doubt more.

I think the odds are that we should remove it from Debian.  The package is not 
without merit, popcon says ~40 submitters which is pretty remarkable given the
state of the package IMHO.   Some of the feedback I've had suggests the idea is
a good one and people would welcome something that worked; but debgtd is not
there yet.

I currently structure my spare time so that I can devote Tuesday nights to
Debian work. Can we please sit on this until the end of Tuesday next week
(29th). I will try to look at it properly on that day and assess whether I can,
within a matter of weeks, make it shippable.  After that day if I have not
managed to do so then I will submit a removal request.

Does that sound sensible?

(that took more than 5 seconds, but it was worthwhile non-the-less.)

Processed: your mail

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2012-05-25T09:27:33

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #674361 [src:dcmtk] dcmtk: FTBFS: ../../ofstd/include/dcmtk/ofstd/ofoset.h:149:11: error: 'Resize' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #674361 [src:dcmtk] dcmtk: FTBFS: ../../ofstd/include/dcmtk/ofstd/ofoset.h:149:11: error: 'Resize' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) pending.
Bug #674350 [src:vxl] vxl: FTBFS: dimosct.h:124:17: error: 'scaleData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) pending.
Bug #674350 [src:vxl] vxl: FTBFS: dimosct.h:124:17: error: 'scaleData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) patch.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#674350:

Mathieu Malaterre — 2012-05-25T09:22:52

tags 674361 patch
tags 674361 pending
tags 674350 pending
tags 674350 patch
thanks

Fixed upstream using:

http://git.dcmtk.org/web?p=dcmtk.git;a=commitdiff;h=dbadc0d8f3760f65504406c8b2cb8633f868a258

Bug#674528: freebsd-glue: removal of freebsd-glue makes filesdisappear from freebsd-buildutils

Andreas Beckmann — 2012-05-25T09:06:27

Package: freebsd-glue
Version: 0.0.1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa< at >lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks

Hi,

during a test with piuparts and EDOS tools I noticed your package causes
removal of files that also belong to another package.
This is caused by using Replaces without corresponding Breaks.

The installation sequence to reproduce this problem is

  apt-get install freebsd-buildutils
  # (1)
  apt-get install freebsd-glue
  apt-get remove freebsd-glue
  # (2)

The list of installed files at points (1) and (2) should be identical,
but the following files have disappeared:

  /usr/include/freebsd/aio.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/asm/stat.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/stat.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/utmp.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/utmpx.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/linux/icmp.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/linux/sysctl.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/machine/endian.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/netdb.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/paths.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/cdefs.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/elf_common.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/endian.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/errno.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/param.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/stat.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/stdint.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/time.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/types.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/unistd.h
  /usr/include/freebsd/vis.h
  /usr/lib/freebsd/awk -> ../../bin/original-awk
  /usr/lib/freebsd/gmake -> ../../bin/make
  /usr/lib/freebsd/sh -> /bin/dash

This is a serious bug violating policy 7.6, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
and also see the footnote that describes this incorrect behavior
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html#f53

The freebsd-glue package has the following relationships with freebsd-buildutils:

  Conflicts: n/a
  Breaks:    n/a
  Replaces:  freebsd-buildutils (<< 9.0-10)
  Depends:   freebsd-buildutils


0m26.0s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared:
  /usr/include/freebsd/aio.h     owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/asm/stat.h        owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/stat.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/utmp.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/bits/utmpx.h      owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/linux/icmp.h      owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/linux/sysctl.h    owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/machine/endian.h  owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/netdb.h   owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/paths.h   owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/cdefs.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/elf_common.h  owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/endian.h      owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/errno.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/param.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/stat.h        owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/stdint.h      owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/time.h        owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/sys/types.h       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/unistd.h  owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/include/freebsd/vis.h     owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/lib/freebsd/awk -> ../../bin/original-awk         owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/lib/freebsd/gmake -> ../../bin/make       owned by: freebsd-glue
  /usr/lib/freebsd/sh -> /bin/dash       owned by: freebsd-glue

0m26.0s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified:
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/freebsd-buildutils.list     not owned


cheers,

Andreas