gmane.games.wesnoth.devel

Re: New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Fabian Mueller — 2013-05-20T18:12:07

I am using only basic functionality,
thus every version that works with the required libsdl-mixer is fine.

Re: New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Mark de Wever — 2013-05-20T10:49:51

Which version of the library will be required?

Re: New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Charles Dang — 2013-05-20T09:43:06

The maccompilestuff download might have to be updated too (it already needs
an updated pango lib), but I'm not sure who can do that with Alarantalara
away.
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev< at >gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Re: New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Nils Kneuper — 2013-05-20T09:29:18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 20.05.2013 08:06, schrieb Fabian Mueller:

As fendrin already pointed out we basically alread have this as indirect
dependency which will not change. Because of this it should be perfectly fine
to just add it as direct dependency, too.

What you should do for this:
1) Make sure scons and cmake are updated accordingly (talk to loonycyborg and
mordante about how to do this)
2) List the direct dependency in INSTALL
3) List if in RELEASE_NOTES
4) Check where to list it in the wiki and add it there, too (probably the
CompilingWesnoth page)

Thanks,
Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGZ7O4ACgkQfFda9thizwVLMwCfX6tK9nFsGC6t7bMbZfShCDGo
w58An0uejtxQ5qjdP/1jtQi04VCrBAWK
=uN+b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Fabian Mueller — 2013-05-20T06:06:29

To be more precise,
the sdl_mixer can be build without vorbis support,
which makes it pretty useless for Wesnoth as shodowmaster pointed out in 
irc.

New dependeny "vorbisfile"

Fabian Mueller — 2013-05-20T05:39:54

Hello,
I like to ask for permission to add another dependency to our build 
systems for the library named in the subject.

I want to use it for reading the titles out of the ogg files' metadata.

The dependency is not really new, since libsdl already depends on it.

Regards,
Fabian

Collaborative UML Tool for Google Summer of Code:Flower Dev Center

Gabriela Popa — 2013-05-17T10:30:37

Hello GSoC Mentors,

As you are participating to Google Summer of Code, I'm wondering if you
could consider using Flower Dev Center [1] while working with students.

Flower Dev Center is an online platform for UML modeling diagramming,
with a strong focus on code synchronization, integration with dev tools
(Git, SVN, etc) and real time collaboration on diagrams (and a little
bit on code as well).

We think Flower Dev Center can be helpful for both: mentors and students
during Google Summer of Code. We have created an article on this topic
(i.e. Flower Dev Center + GSoC): [2], [3].

If you have a couple of spare minutes, could you tell us if you would
like to use Flower Dev Center? And/or raise topics that you think are
important (based on previous GSoC participations) to be supported by
Flower Dev Center?

REMARK1: The next version of Flower Dev Center, the 2.0.0 planned for
June/July 2013, has major new features, that we did not demonstrate yet
and that will improve even more the collaboration between developers.

REMARK2: Flower Dev Center doesn't currently support C++ programming
language. But if you are interested in using Flower Dev Center, we'll
prioritize it's implementation and we'll work hard to do it ASAP, with
Flower Dev Center 2.0.0.

REMARK3: Flower Dev Center will support programming languages that are
not object oriented, starting with 2.0.0

Thank you in advance!

Best regards,
Gabriela < at > Flower Platform Team.

[1] - Flower Dev Center web site - http://www.flower-platform.com
[2] - Video “Flower Dev Center + Google Summer of Code” -
http://learn-discuss.flower-platform.com/flower_dev_center/videos/flower_dev_center_and_google_summer_of_code_2013_the_video
[3] - Text version with same content as the above video -
http://learn-discuss.flower-platform.com/flower_dev_center/tutorials/flower_dev_center_and_google_summer_of_code_2013

Re: Wesnoth 1.11.3 crashy and will not be announced

Nils Kneuper — 2013-05-15T17:58:57

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 13.05.2013 20:04, schrieb Nils Kneuper:

The offending commit was reverted for the moment and I just created the new
1.11.4 release.
Cheers,
Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGTzOEACgkQfFda9thizwVSAACfV9auNYPXu53nSTMaGbWq+6R+
gkoAoJOhXBGezemCwLrKii5O1EJuCk+U
=5AU2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Pierre T. — 2013-05-13T21:48:59

The dependencies should be:

(1) OpenSSL for secure transmission of the password (Boost.Asio.SSL need 
it). (Required).
(2) SOCI - The C++ Database Access Library for communicates with any 
kind of underlining databases. (Advisable).
(3) The back-end specific to the database (Required):
   (3.1) MySQL client (if MySQL database).
   (3.2) SQLite 3 library (if SQLite database).
(4) Boost (Required).
(5) Boost.Log (which will be officially added in the next release) 
(Advisable).

I think that's all. I'm adding a specific section in my proposal and if 
any I think of any new, I'll notice you.

Pierre Talbot

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Mark de Wever — 2013-05-13T19:47:37

I was more referring to the build-dependancies for the addon-server.

Wesnoth 1.11.3 crashy and will not be announced

Nils Kneuper — 2013-05-13T18:04:10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everybody!
Mattsc just told me that some commit completely broke MicroAIs resulting in
them crashing in basically 100% of all cases. Because of this I will not
announce the currently tagged 1.11.3. What I will do is release 1.11.4 once
this issue is fixed which will hopefully be very soon.
Cheers,
Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGRKxoACgkQfFda9thizwUMqQCfQ0vaY/gDOZWgjSrKgKcapozN
NLIAoJ01079sNdEFLdquFL6CZb+vfbHN
=cCRc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Pierre T. — 2013-05-11T18:18:47

MySQL: None as it already runs on the server.
SQLite: Installation of a library package (~350ko).

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Mark de Wever — 2013-05-11T18:04:27

What dependency would be required for this database?

We also discussed using SQLite [1] for this project. Which database
engine do the server admins prefer? MySQL, SQLite or another database?


[1] http://www.sqlite.org/

Repository conversion status

Eric S. Raymond — 2013-05-11T13:38:05

Yes, I am still working on this problem.  No, there won't be fast
results.

The request to break the resources and website directiroes into
sepearate directories once again re-complicates a job that has been
re-complicated several times already.

The processing and recompression runs continue to take *days* of
continuous processing each.

Re: release of 1.11.3

Nils Kneuper — 2013-05-11T07:36:54

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 11.05.2013 03:11, schrieb JT Coding:

We are using the wesnoth.-old repository for the moment. And we have no clue
yet when we might switch to the "really final" one. This might still be
several months away considering the progress lately...
Cheers,
Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGN9RYACgkQfFda9thizwXuiQCfTfa+XZVHgQW8/zTwZYAePmvi
zMUAnR1E8EFUcOH/R9Jm+pEzz4rn4VC+
=SouN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev< at >gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Re: release of 1.11.3

JT Coding — 2013-05-11T01:11:41

That is true (although it might not be too bad since the report was only 
"may" affect mainline content). Has there been an update on the state of 
the repository? I have been putting off switching to git until the 
repository is no longer in a transitory state.


JaMiT



_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev< at >gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Re: release of 1.11.3

Lipka Boldizsár — 2013-05-09T19:43:29

Bug #20704 has not yet been fixed (it's a blocker). However, JaMiT mentioned 
that he has solved the problem already in his local repo.

Nils Kneuper a következőt írta ekkor: 2013. május 9. 20:43:19


_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev< at >gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

release of 1.11.3

Nils Kneuper — 2013-05-09T18:43:19

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everybody!
Last weekend fendrin asked me when I planned to release 1.11.3 and all I could
reply was "I could do so next weekend". To not surprise you too much I wanted
to make sure that I plan to release on Saturday (2013-05-11) afternoon (local
time in Germany). So if you still want to get anything in, please do so.

For the release I will be using wesnoth-old at github.com.

In case you know of anything which should block me from getting this release
out, please tell me ASAP.
Cheers,
Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGL7kcACgkQfFda9thizwUnjgCfc8b0lOcNO5JTuCUJOhzMj6VO
e0wAn37M1/IZMu8729SYMcl47W0DCXfQ
=RQ1S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Pierre T. — 2013-05-08T06:39:59

Ok that's nice so !

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Soliton — 2013-05-07T21:03:01

Am 07.05.2013 um 21:41 schrieb "Pierre T." <ptalbot< at >mopong.net>:

Based on your proposal I guess there is nothing more than setting up a DB with that schema and some user with write access. That should be no problem.

Re: [wesnoth-dev][gsoc-2013] Add-on server

Pierre T. — 2013-05-07T19:41:47

Thanks for response, you can find my proposal here: 
http://wiki.wesnoth.org/User:Trademark/GSoC_2013/Addon_Server:_Create_a_new_and_shiny_one

The interesting section about database is here, you will find a database 
diagram.

http://wiki.wesnoth.org/User:Trademark/GSoC_2013/Addon_Server:_Create_a_new_and_shiny_one#Option_2:_Relational_database

I'm not sure what are the others requirements that I should state, could 
you precise that please ?

Regards,
Pierre Talbot