<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel">
    <title>gmane.comp.web.zope.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28264"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28263"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28262"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28261"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28260"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28259"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28258"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28257"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28256"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28255"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28254"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28253"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28252"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28251"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28250"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28249"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28248"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28247"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28246"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28245"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28264">
    <title>zope-tests - OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28264</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-05-23 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-24 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

       Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux
[1]    FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
       Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
       winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--------------

[1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063488.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Zope tests summarizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T01:00:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28263">
    <title>Re: zope-tests - OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28263</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Hanno, 'svn log' suggests your shuffling in the test suite stuff makes
this break under 2.6.  The code which broke was *not* checked in by you:
 I just tried adding a 2.6-compatible fix.


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T04:20:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28262">
    <title>zope-tests - OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28262</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-23 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

       Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux
[1]    FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
       Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
       winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--------------

[1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063447.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Zope tests summarizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T01:00:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28261">
    <title>Re: zope.i18n plural form support</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28261</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/23/2012 03:45 PM, Thomas Massmann wrote:

I will review the code this evening.


Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tseaver&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+9UwoACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7f5gCgnziN52wFe5h88GdFc9Ggg3vW
wKIAniVRr6IepcFC3aafKaTxJrN8oQEw
=MI+O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T21:13:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28260">
    <title>Re: zope.i18n plural form support</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28260</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

how do we continue on this? Is someone willing to take a look at the 
code, especially the C module of zope.i18nmessageid? I adjusted it and 
the tests are passing, but I'm not an experienced C developer. Is it 
worth merging it to the SVN trunk or a new SVN branch? Any feedback is 
welcome ;)

Cheers,
Thomas


Thomas Massmann wrote:
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Massmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T19:45:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28259">
    <title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28259</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
zope.app.appsetup gets tested as part of the ZTK 1.0 full-suite tests,
both released and dev.  I'm just suggesting we can drop the individual
test (test the dev version against released versions of dependencies), as
I don't believe there is any real development happening.


Great work, thanks!


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T13:52:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28258">
    <title>zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 41, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28258</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

       Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux
[1]    FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
       Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[2]    winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
[3]    winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--------------

[1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063405.html


[2]    FAILED  winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063383.html


[3]    FAILED  winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063382.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Zope tests summarizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T01:00:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28257">
    <title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28257</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Unfortunately somehow Plone still depends on it.



I THINK I fixed it.
The commit message explains the failure if anybody wants to know.
http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/126448
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Gerken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T20:53:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28256">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28256</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Now done, and released as zope.interface 4.0.1.


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T20:06:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28255">
    <title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28255</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

I made a stab at fixing it, but couldn't figure out which version of
Twisted was compatible (none of the more recent versions work).  I have
no idea why tests passed before I copied the release branch.




I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually.



This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack.


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T17:44:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28254">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28254</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
On Python3, it *needs* to be an exception:  code which still uses the
class advice APIs won't work.


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T17:37:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28253">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28253</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
FWIW, I'm no longer using 2to3 for anything (it was the source of the
multi-minute install time for zope.interfaceu under Py3k).  I have no
objection to having the relevant fixers added to the zope.fixers package.


Tres.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tres Seaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T17:36:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28252">
    <title>Re: ZTK 1.0 lifetime</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28252</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Eek, I started mixing up ztk and zope.app

I didn't look too deep into Zope2 because my intention was more for
asking whether packages like zope.app.appsetup need to be tested and
they are only part of ztk 1.0 zopeapp.cfg,
but now I had second look into versions.cfg of zope and plone and I am
seeing that the latest plone still pins versions of ztk 1.0 zopeapp,
and zope.app.appsetup even is a dependency somewhere in plone.

Aww, too bad.

Best regards,

         Patrick

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting &amp;lt;hanno&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;hannosch.eu&amp;gt; wrote:
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Gerken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T15:28:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28251">
    <title>ZTK 1.0 lifetime</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28251</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that
uses ZTK 1.1 and a potential Zope 4 is aiming at a future ZTK 1.2
(currently ZTK master).

So from Zope 2's and Plone's perspective the ZTK 1.0 tests are vital
and should be supported for the next couple of years. The only
difference is that Zope 2 requires at least Python 2.6, so testing
Python 2.5 + ZTK 1.0 isn't required.

And this shouldn't be all too hard, as there's no major differences
between ZTK 1.0 and 1.1.

Hanno
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Hanno Schlichting</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T14:57:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28250">
    <title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28250</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad.

Error in test test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall
(AccessControl.tests.testClassSecurityInfo.ClassSecurityInfoTests)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/python2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 279, in run
    testMethod()
  File "/home/stefan/autotest/temp/python26-zope214all/eggs/AccessControl-3.0-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/AccessControl/tests/testClassSecurityInfo.py",
line 131, in test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall
    with self.assertRaisesRegexp(AssertionError, 'has 2 non-decorator'):
AttributeError: 'ClassSecurityInfoTests' object has no attribute
'assertRaisesRegexp'


zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a
dependency.



Same error as last time.
Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup?
ztk does not depend on it
it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1
Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it.
Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is
also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named
ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on
zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already.

Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so,
who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for
1.0?
If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people
ignore the summarizer thread.


Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did?
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Gerken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T08:32:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28249">
    <title>zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28249</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-05-20 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

       Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux
[1]    FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
[2]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
[3]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[4]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
       Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[5]    winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
[6]    winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--------------

[1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html


[2]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html


[3]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html


[4]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html


[5]    FAILED  winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html


[6]    FAILED  winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Zope tests summarizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T01:00:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28248">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28248</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Which is good enough. You only need to run it once.

//Lennart
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Lennart Regebro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T19:38:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28247">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28247</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
+1 to silencing the warnings under Python 2

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Brian Sutherland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T15:54:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28246">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28246</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;2012/5/20 Tres Seaver &amp;lt;tseaver&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;palladion.com&amp;gt;:

If they are exceptions under Python 3, developers will get them and
have to fix when porting to Python 3. There is a lot of other work to
be done at the same time. But under Python 2, implements and friends
continue to work, so the warnings are very annoying.


Please, only warn on Python 3.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Gediminas Paulauskas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T08:49:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28245">
    <title>zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 38</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28245</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-05-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-20 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

       Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux
       Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux
[1]    Repository policy check found errors in 335 projects
[2]    Total languishing bugs for zope2: 13
[3]    Total languishing bugs for zope: 74
[4]    Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1
[5]    Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 211
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
[6]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
[7]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[8]    ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
       Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
       Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
       winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[9]    winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
[10]   winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
       winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--------------

[1]    FAILED  Repository policy check found errors in 335 projects
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063295.html


[2]    FAILED  Total languishing bugs for zope2: 13
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063293.html


[3]    FAILED  Total languishing bugs for zope: 74
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063292.html


[4]    FAILED  Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063289.html


[5]    FAILED  Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 211
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063290.html


[6]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063297.html


[7]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063299.html


[8]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063298.html


[9]    FAILED  winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063300.html


[10]   FAILED  winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063296.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Zope tests summarizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T01:00:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28244">
    <title>Re: zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/28244</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Except that most of us aren't going to use 2to3, except for an initial
stab at porting to 2&amp;amp;3.

Jim

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Fulton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T20:42:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.web.zope.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.web.zope.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

