<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core">
    <title>gmane.comp.kde.devel.core</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56014"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56013"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56012"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56011"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56010"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56009"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56008"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56007"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56006"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56005"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56004"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56003"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56002"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56001"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56000"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55999"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55998"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55997"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55996"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55995"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56014">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56014</link>
    <description>we already tried pushing it into the standard - to no avail so far.
i think we'd have better chances to push a new $v which allows only
variable expansion, unlike $e which also allows command substitution.
and it should be obvious why we cannot use it in shared files until it
is an accepted standard and all major players actually implement it.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Oswald Buddenhagen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T00:59:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56013">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56013</link>
    <description>
it's non-standard but ... it's a standard we created (ostensibly, anyways). 
but then we say "we can't do it because we have to stick within this standard" 
rather than try and improve that standard. seems a bit daft not to?

</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron J. Seigo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T00:47:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56012">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56012</link>
    <description>yes, but the actual implementation is non-trivial (at least the full one
including $() syntax). apart from that, given that it is non-standard,
kde definitely MUST NOT (yay, RFC terminology) write it to potentially
shareable .desktop files. that was alread fixed (maybe even multiple
times), but somehow it got re-enabled directly or indirectly, or this
particular case was not covered in the first place.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Oswald Buddenhagen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:55:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56011">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56011</link>
    <description>
nothing else can read it because even when offered patches they reject them. 
*cough*

what [$e] and [$i] provides is rather useful, and it would seem to make sense 
to either propose an alternative or adopt what is really an improvement.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron J. Seigo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:45:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56010">
    <title>KStyle/KIconEngine problem WAS Re: Bug in icon kcm?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56010</link>
    <description>A Dimarts 02 Desembre 2008, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:

The problem is that it does not work though, most of the painting is done in 
QCommonStyle by calling KIconEngine::pixmap that always sets 
KIconLoader::Desktop as group because it seems it can not know which it's 
parent is.

One "solution" would be never calling QCommonStyle and making KStyle deal with 
it all the calls so it can do the correct calls, but that's completely an 
impoosible amount of work.

Other hack would be having a type variable in KIconEngine that is set each 
time KStyle calls QCommonStyle so when QCommonStyle ends up calling 
KIconEngine::pixmap we know which type of element we are rendering. But that 
would not work with threads, although i'm not sure if one can use KStyle in 
threads

The obviously simple solution is dropping this icon effects thing 
altogether :-/

Albert




</description>
    <dc:creator>Albert Astals Cid</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:31:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56009">
    <title>Re: Bug in icon kcm?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56009</link>
    <description>A Dilluns 01 Desembre 2008, Louai Al-Khanji va escriure:

Done, thanks for reporting.

Albert




</description>
    <dc:creator>Albert Astals Cid</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:18:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56008">
    <title>Re: [ANNOUNCE] new website for kde mailing-list archives</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56008</link>
    <description>
Done.

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:01:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56007">
    <title>Re: KProcess Line Mode Patch</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56007</link>
    <description>
It should have a "set" prefix. The getter can have an "is" prefix:
void setLineModeEnabled(bool enable)
bool isLineModeEnabled() const;

</description>
    <dc:creator>Thiago Macieira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:53:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56006">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56006</link>
    <description>On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf
&lt;annemarie.mahfouf&lt; at &gt;free.fr&gt; wrote:

I'm not the worlds greatest expert on regular expressions.. but why do
you make the addition a group? wouldn't it be better to do
("^XDG_(.*)_DIR.*=(.*)$")) and that way it is not necessary to change
the line further on.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan Meltzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:53:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56005">
    <title>Re: qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56005</link>
    <description>
No, I don't think so. This patch will be rejected in Qt.

KDE should be fixed to not add the [$e] because nothing other than KDE 
will be able to read it.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Thiago Macieira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:52:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56004">
    <title>qt-copy patch for QDesktopServices to allow path kcm to work</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56004</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Anne-Marie Mahfouf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T21:45:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56003">
    <title>Re: move QCoreApplication::addLibraryPath call from KApplication toKComponentData</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56003</link>
    <description>
Looks good to me. Thanks.

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:44:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56002">
    <title>Re: KProcess Line Mode Patch</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56002</link>
    <description>
Just a general advice that came to my mind while reading your message:

The name of a method taking a bool parameter should clearly convey the 
meaning of passing true/false to the method.

setOutputLineMode( bool mode ) fails to convey this meaning.

This method should rather be named enableOutputLineMode( bool enable ) 
or be replaced by a more general setOutputMode( OutputMode mode ).


Regards,
Ingo
</description>
    <dc:creator>Ingo Klöcker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:41:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56001">
    <title>Re: Idea: SkipDirtyOnIdenticalValues WriteConfigFlag for KConfigBase/ KConfig</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56001</link>
    <description>
On the contrary - if you change a toolbar to "big" and then to "normal" again,
it looks normal like any other toolbar. If you change the system default 6 months
later, it would be really unexpected that this toolbar doesn't behave like all others.


Well, KMainWindow and KToolBar definitely do use revertToDefault(),
so it would be nice if it could be unbroken......

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:20:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56000">
    <title>Re: Race condition with data loss in ReadWritePart</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/56000</link>
    <description>
Yes, at least.


There's a comment against that in the code already.
ReadWritePart::~ReadWritePart()
{
    // parent destructor will delete temp file
    // we can't call our own closeUrl() here, because
    // "cancel" wouldn't cancel anything. We have to assume
    // the app called closeUrl() before destroying us.
}


Done now. Better late than never...


I don't understand this one. ReadOnlyPart::openUrl() already calls closeUrl
which is virtual so it does call ReadWritePart::closeUrl() [or your reimplementation of it].

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:08:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55999">
    <title>Re: Various problems/bugs with actions/toolbars in aKParts::MainWindow</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55999</link>
    <description>
This works nowadays, after all the fixes by ereslibre and myself, right?


This sounds like a misuse of kactioncollections? Not putting the actions
into the collections, or into the wrong one, or something like that. The dialog
works in other apps afaik.


Still the case?


Still the case?

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faure</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T19:50:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55998">
    <title>Re: [PATCH] thread-safe KQueuedDialog episode 2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55998</link>
    <description>Looks good to me.

On Friday 28 November 2008 22:54:43 Sebastian Trueg wrote:

</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthias Kretz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T19:01:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55997">
    <title>Re: KProcess Line Mode Patch</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55997</link>
    <description>
We did. But I don't remember doing the work in QTextStream and QDataStream. So 
the solution is there, but not used.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Thiago Macieira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:14:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55996">
    <title>Re: closing bugs products</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55996</link>
    <description>Hi,

Hurra for all cleaning up of bko, in general :)

Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2008, um 16:52 Uhr, schrieb Matt Rogers:

Why shouldn't it stay a product of its own? 


Promo people still think of bringing it back to life, AFAIR.


It is. Only part of KDE since 4.1. See e.g. here:
http://utils.kde.org/projects/printer-applet/development.php

There should perhaps be one central database for the metadata of all KDE 
programs/modules, which is reused in techbase, userbase, bugzilla and 
elsewhere, containing data like homepage, maintainer, releases, icon/logo, 
etc. So such information is consistent and can be automatically made 
available.

Cheers
Friedrich
</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich W. H. Kossebau</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T16:53:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55995">
    <title>Re: closing bugs products</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55995</link>
    <description>
isn't printer-applet new though?
</description>
    <dc:creator>Matt Rogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T15:52:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55994">
    <title>Re: KProcess Line Mode Patch</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55994</link>
    <description>
Thiago and Ossi already commented on all the technical problems and wether
this is really so much needed. Sure having some line-splitting in kdelibs
might be good, but splitting a QByteArray at '\n' and returning the lines +
"rest" is a simple function in a namespace (or working on QString instead)
no need to fiddle around with delimiters, encodings and so on on a KProcess
level.

So -1 from me.

Andreas

</description>
    <dc:creator>Andreas Pakulat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T15:12:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.kde.devel.core">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.kde.devel.core</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
