<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad">
    <title>gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2381"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2379"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2378"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2374"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2373"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2371"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2370"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2369"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2368"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2367"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2366"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2363"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2362"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2361"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2360"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2359"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2358"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2357"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2356"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2355"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2381">
    <title>Missing Notes tab nautilus in Ubuntu 12.04</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2381</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Dear Andre,
I have sent another email just a few seconds ago to you about the tabs bug
675417 and want to know if it has been re-inserted into the properties section
so I can use it in the latest version of nautilus.
Sorry for using this arena to contact you but it was available.
Thank you for your time
Philip, San Antonio, TX
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T15:38:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2379">
    <title>Fwd: pygobject bug spring cleaning</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2379</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;CC'ing gnome-bugsquad FYI.

andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-21T23:23:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2378">
    <title>GNOME Quarterly Report Q1/2012</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2378</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everybody, 

it's time again for a quarterly GNOME report to let community and
companies know what has been going on between January and March 2012.

Please update your section for Q1/2012 here:

      https://live.gnome.org/GnomeMarketing/QuarterlyReports/2012/Q1


The list of potential teams and writers:

 * Board and Executive Director - Karen Sandler
 * Bugsquad - Andre Klapper
 * Membership and Elections Committee - Tobias Mueller
 * GNOME User Groups - ???
 * Accessibility Team - Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias, Joanmarie Diggs
 * Outreach Program for Women - Marina Zhurakhinskaya
 * Localization - Petr Kovar
 * Documentation - ???
 * Web - Andreas Nilsson, Vinicius Depizzol
 * Google Summer of Code 2012 - ???
 * Marketing - ???
 * Sysadmin - ???
 * Design - ???
 * Conference planning: GUADEC, GNOME.asia? - ???


If you do not have time, please consider delegating the task! 

There are some sections that do not have writers yet - please fill your
name in on the wiki if you could write a summary. It really does not
have to be long!

I also assume that every writer welcomes help and input (that's why I
also send this to corresponding mailing lists).

We would like to finish the Q1 report before by May 11, 2012.

Thanks for your help, 
andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-16T14:21:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2374">
    <title>Re: Last GNOME 3.4 Blocker Report</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2374</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Andre,

Andre Klapper schreef op 19.03.2012 09:51:


I haven't followed development closely as of late, but I'll take my 
chances to bring up the issue that in 3.3.90 on Mageia Cauldron, I 
cannot add my Google account which uses two-step authentication. This 
bug has been filed against Empathy but as far as I can tell it's valid 
for all kind of Google accounts: 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647007. I asked about it on 
IRC and Owen replied that he had seen workiong two-step authentication 
demonstrated by dzeuthen at some point.

IMHO, this is a pretty serious issue.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Reinout van Schouwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-19T10:19:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2373">
    <title>Last GNOME 3.4 Blocker Report</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2373</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;GNOME 3.4.0 will be released in one week.
Later today is HARD CODE FREEZE (but you can always ask the release-team
for exceptions).

This is a list of potential release blockers plus some "should-fix"
tickets.

This list is not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help from
packagers, developers, maintainers, contributors, etc. is welcome.

Please do speak up if some important bugs are not listed here.

andre

======================================
AT-SPI
===================
Orca commands are sometimes passed through to the application
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671976

===================
CHEESE
===================
All buttons disabled. Can not take photo or video.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671357

===================
CLUTTER-GTK
===================
floating toolbar not working (in Empathy)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670874

===================
EPIPHANY
===================
There are still references to the "GNOME web browser" on translations
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671424
Would require string freeze breaks.

===================
GDM
===================
[PATCH] add automatic multi seat support
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655380

===================
GNOME-CONTROL-CENTER
===================
Trying to add a new language: crash while typing in the search field before the language list is completely populated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693
Good stacktrace available.

===================
GNOME-SESSION
===================
fail whale extension list looks bad
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693
Needs more information and testing.

[PATCH] Need signal matching Setenv dbus method so apps in
initialization phase can update their env too
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662528
Five patches available awaiting review for two months now

gnome-session no longer starts desktop files
under /usr/share/gdm/autostart/LoginWindow
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663721
Inline patch that needs more work available

===================
GNOME-SHELL
===================
Be able to ask for IM account password
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658961
Patch reviewed and needs updating; would require okay from gnome-i18n&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;

Extension loading is broken in 3.3.90
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670477
Confirmed by another user

[PATCH] networkAgent: Fix external-ui dialogs
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671556
Patch needs another review and commit

[PATCH] Orca doesn't present ""Overview"" name when this is focused
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671378
Patch adds two new strings, needs okay from gnome-i18n&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;

restart by typing ""r"" in the gnome-shell run-dialog 2x in one minute
brings up the ""oops"" window
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648384

[NEEDINFO] Gnome 3.0 and 3.2 crashing when disabling wireless
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668388
Stuck as no news have been provided. Might unmark this soon.

======================================

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-19T08:51:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2371">
    <title>GNOME 3.4 Blocker Report</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2371</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;GNOME 3.4.0 will be released in two weeks.

This is a list of potential release blockers plus some "should-fix"
tickets according to yesterday's release team meeting.

This list is not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help from
packagers, developers, maintainers, contributors, etc. is welcome.

Please do speak up if some important bugs are not listed here.

andre

======================================
CHEESE
===================
All buttons disabled. Can not take photo or video.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671357

===================
GDM
===================
[PATCH] Port to GSettings
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635375

[PATCH] add automatic multi seat support
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655380

===================
GNOME-SESSION
===================
fail whale extension list looks bad
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693
Needs more information and testing.

[PATCH] Need signal matching Setenv dbus method so apps in
initialization phase can update their env too
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662528
Five patches available awaiting review for two months now

gnome-session no longer starts desktop files
under /usr/share/gdm/autostart/LoginWindow
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663721
Inline patch that needs more work available

fail whale triggers too easily
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671694

===================
GNOME-SHELL
===================
Be able to ask for IM account password
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658961
Patch reviewed and needs updating; would require okay from gnome-i18n&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;

Extension loading is broken in 3.3.90
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670477
Confirmed by another user

[PATCH] Expose ATK_STATE_EXPANDABLE and ATK_STATE_EXPANDED as
appropriate for Alt+Tab switcher
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670719

[PATCH] Orca doesn't present ""Overview"" name when this is focused
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671378
Patch adds two new strings, needs okay from gnome-i18n&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;

[PATCH] Orca doesn't present the proper role for items on the top panel
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667432
Two patches that need review

  [PATCH] Orca doesn't present anything when run dialog is launched
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670308
  Second patch needs a review, depends on bug 667432

[PATCH] Orca doesn't present Categories on the Applications view
correctly
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670327
Both patches have been reviewed, probably just needs a commit?

[PATCH] Orca doesn't present some elements at user menu
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671404

[PATCH] Required a way to add accessible states to a generic container
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668366
Two patches that need review

[PATCH] Notifications need ROLE_NOTIFICATION so that ATs can identify
and present them
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648645
Simple and tested two-liner patch needs review and commit

(dynamic) workspace count stored in dconf
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671568
Last open ticket of the "Stuff writing to dconf on first login"
collection

Gnome 3.0 and 3.2 crashing when disabling wireless
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668388
Patch was rejected; no news since then

restart by typing ""r"" in the gnome-shell run-dialog 2x in one minute
brings up the ""oops"" window
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648384

Integration of keyboard indicator with input methods
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641531
Patch awaiting review. Quite complex and new strings so maybe postpone
to 3.6?

===================
GTK+
===================
gnome-panel crashes with multiple screens
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662023
Good stacktrace available; Comment 28 has info how to reproduce

GtkStyle background color regression
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671437
Seen by two people; visible in Evolution.

===================
LIBGWEATHER
===================
[PATCH] Port to GSettings
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646854

===================
MUTTER
===================
[PATCH] Access on unreffed pointer
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671601
Patch reviewed already, just needs to go in.

======================================

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-09T11:50:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2370">
    <title>Re: bluetooth-manager doesn't find devices</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2370</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Thanks for you advice, I'll repost on gnome-love!

See you,

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fabrice DELENTE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T10:27:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2369">
    <title>Re: bluetooth-manager doesn't find devices</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2369</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello Fabrice :)

On 07.03.2012 19:00, Fabrice DELENTE wrote:
I have the feeling that gnome-love is more appropriate for your issue.
Check out http://live.gnome.org/GnomeLove

And I have no idea about your issue, sorry.

Cheers,
  Tobi

_______________________________________________
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobias Mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T10:21:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2368">
    <title>bluetooth-manager doesn't find devices</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2368</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello.

I don't think it's a bug, I think I just misinstalled it but I didn't
find any relevant forum or mailing list, sorry for the noise.

I compiled and installed gnome-bluetooth on a slackware 13.37 machine
that doesn't use gnome.

When I start bluetooth-manager, it keeps searching forever for
devices, even though I can see them and connect to them with blueman
(but blueman seems unsupported now...), bot as a user or as root.

I think there is a misconfiguration somewhere, how can I find it? Does
bluetooth-manager rely on modification in policy files?

Thanks.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fabrice DELENTE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T18:00:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2367">
    <title>Re: Handling bug reports on user documentation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2367</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
This is, in theory, a useful thing. If the bug affects the docs, give
it the keyword and don't close it until the docs are updated. I think
I've also proposed in the past just not closing bugs and instead moving
them to the docs component, as well as some sort of special "NEEDSDOC"
status/resolution.

The problem with any of these mechanisms is that, unless developers use
them religiously, we still have to chase down changes, so the partial
list we get from bugzilla isn't that much help.

--
Shaun
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Shaun McCance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T21:31:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2366">
    <title>Re: Handling bug reports on user documentation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2366</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Makes sense.


I've fixed the defaults of the affected Bugzilla products and for all
open tickets (which was exactly one).


The problem is how to identify them... Might need quite some manual
reviewing when I'm bored at the Docs Hackfest. :P


The keyword description says "This bug (or something in it) needs
documenting."
Querying for reports that got the "documentation" keyword *added*:
* in the last  90 days[1]:   2
* in the last  365 days:     5
* in the last  730 days:    16
* in the last 1825 days:    28

=&amp;gt; Usage seems to not be very widespread anyway.
Removing the keyword (used by 1816 tickets in total) might be too noisy,
but we could update the keyword description and give better instructions
(file a ticket in the Docs component for user docs issues, or something
similar, no idea about devel-docs though).

andre


[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now;query_format=advanced;chfield=keywords;chfieldfrom=-90d;chfieldvalue=documentation
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T21:17:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2363">
    <title>Annual GNOME Bugzilla statistics for 2011</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2363</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Ladies and Gentlemen,

a quick look at some basic GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2011.
Created by using
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html&amp;amp;days=365&amp;amp;products=0&amp;amp;reporters=15&amp;amp;hunters=15&amp;amp;patchers=15&amp;amp;reviewers=15


Overall statistics:
                                2011   2010   2009
  Open reports at the end(*):   44003  42828  40527
  Opened in that year:          28287  32232  39403
  Closed in that year:          27552  30534  40280
    (*): Excludes reports marked as enhancements


The following people closed more than 600 bugs in 2011:
  3098       Akhil Laddha
  1473       Fabio Durán Verdugo
  1084       Matthias Clasen
   920       Bastien Nocera
   820       André Klapper
   792       Cosimo Cecchi
   781       Milan Crha


The following people reported more than 200 bugs in 2011:
   292       William Jon McCann
   291       Matthias Clasen
   291       Guillaume Desmottes
   287       Cosimo Cecchi
   278       Akhil Laddha
   248       Bastien Nocera
   219       Vincent Untz
   210       Pedro Villavicencio
   200       Joanmarie Diggs


The following people contributed more than 200 patches in 2011:
   449       Guillaume Desmottes
   401       Jasper St. Pierre
   389       Milan Crha
   370       Matthias Clasen
   333       Dan Winship
   321       Florian Müllner
   316       Vincent Penquerc'h
   300       Colin Walters
   250       Cosimo Cecchi
   212       Giovanni Campagna


The following people reviewed more than 250 patches in 2011:
   686       Dan Winship
   662       Owen Taylor
   611       Sebastian Dröge
   587       Colin Walters
   579       Matthias Clasen
   420       Bastien Nocera
   392       Guillaume Desmottes
   383       Florian Müllner
   319       Jasper St. Pierre


Enjoy 2012!,
andre

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-02T12:06:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2362">
    <title>Re: Automatic bug-buddy reports to GNOME Bugzilla now rejected</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2362</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
That line should have been:
Note that this de-facto blocks ANY automatic reports by bug-buddy

andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-13T11:06:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2361">
    <title>Automatic bug-buddy reports to GNOME Bugzilla now rejected</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2361</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;As GNOME 3.2.2 was released on November 17th I have bumped the minimally
required GNOME version for bug reports submitted to GNOME Bugzilla via
bug-buddy from 2.32.0 to 3.0.0.
Note that de facto blocks ANY automatic reports bug bug-buddy, as a
version 3 of bug-buddy does not exist as most distros have downstream
reporting tools nowadays.

Reports filed in the last 60 days including the string "BugBuddy Version: 2": 103
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now;query_format=advanced;chfield=[Bug%20creation];chfieldfrom=-60d;longdesc=BugBuddy%20Version%3A%202;longdesc_type=substring

Reports filed in the last 60 days including the string "Gnome Release: 2": 103
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now;query_format=advanced;chfield=[Bug%20creation];chfieldfrom=-60d;longdesc=Gnome%20Release%3A%202;longdesc_type=substring

Reports filed in the last 60 days including the string "BugBuddy Version: 3": 0
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now;query_format=advanced;chfield=[Bug%20creation];chfieldfrom=-60d;longdesc=BugBuddy%20Version%3A%202;longdesc_type=substring

andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-13T11:03:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2360">
    <title>Google Code-In 2011: Second (and last) round coming; Tasks wanted!</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2360</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;[Please edit the recipients list if your answer is specific to your
mailing list to avoid unneeded cross-posting.]


The second and last bunch of Google Code-In tasks will be published on
December 16th. Afterwards no tasks can be added anymore, so if you have
an idea take a look at https://live.gnome.org/GoogleCodeIn and add it
NOW!

For basic info about Google Code-In see my previous announcement email:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-October/msg00175.html

http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2011/12/09/google-code-in-2011-second-and-last-round-coming/ lists some of the achievements of the last weeks.

Thanks,
andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T13:30:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2359">
    <title>Re: proposed triages</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2359</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've answered this already on IRC, still pasting it here for the
records.
Note that for those that I did not comment on I totally agree.

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:27 +0000, kbenjamin Coplon wrote:

can you elaborate? did you retest it?


yes, perfect. please go ahead and close it, mentioning that comment 4 in
the other report, and asking the reporter to leave a comment if it's
still an issue in a recent version of brasero


I'd add a comment explaining that we **assume** as per comment 2 that
it's an ubuntu-specific issue. so NOTGNOME is fine, but also ask if it's
still an issue in recent versions, just to be sure.


if you tested that this still doesn't exist in 3.2, all your proposed
changes sound good. I'd keep "OS = Linux" though, it's not really
important here.


I'd also reset the old Target Milestone to ---



Looks good! Thanks!

andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-30T17:10:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2358">
    <title>proposed triages</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2358</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505995  obsolete
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514106  fixed_in_stable
(see it's duplicate
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554071#c4)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578180  not_gnome (looks
like a Ubuntu patch also version 2.26.0)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348316  "new" version 3.2x
GNOME version "unversioned enhancement" os "all" importance "normal
,enhancement"
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389476 "new"
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438850 "new" UE version
unspecified os all
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584893 "new"   version unspecified
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438852 "new" os all
milestone na GNOME ver UE
what do you think so far?
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>kbenjamin Coplon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-30T03:27:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2357">
    <title>Re: may i please have permission to triage</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2357</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hi, 
I've handed out permissions to you (and added you to my bugmail
watchlist). Please make sure that you have read the triage guide.
In short: 1) Use common sense. 2) If unsure, ask first before changing
some fields.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=brasero might be a good
place to start. In case that you are unsure please just add a comment to
the bug report, but do not change any fields - or ask in the #bugs IRC
channel on irc.gimp.org (and be patient as not everybody is always in
front of a computer). Your primary contacts are kittykat and andre.

Enjoy!,
andre
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Klapper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-29T21:02:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2356">
    <title>may i please have permission to triage</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2356</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;i ask because of
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2011/7137205
thanks
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>kbenjamin Coplon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-29T20:50:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2355">
    <title>Re: Fwd: A question related to issue resolution practices in Gnome</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2355</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Thank you, thats a lot of valuable information to think about and understand.
E.g., I completely missed the Bugmaster's role, somehow implicitly
confused that with a developer role. Two quick clarifications/answers below.

 &amp;gt; For me, yes! Though thorough analysis needs to be done. Sometimes the
 &amp;gt; data might indicate one thing, while practically something else happens.
Exactly, to add to your point, our goals are roughly threefold:
At the technical level, the hope is to simplify some queries that are not
so easily generated via Bugzilla reports: time trends, intervals between states,
particular trajectories (e.g., *-resolved-unconfirmed-resolved-*).
 From the more practical perspective, to come up with summary measures
that accurately reflect concerns of various teams (maintainer, bugsquad, user).
 From a theoretical perspective to learn from (and, hopefully, to help with) the
distributed decision making process that takes place in this large and complex
organization with a variety of roles/stakeholders.

 &amp;gt; Ideally it should be built into Pe2. How does Pe2 gather its data btw?
Depends on the project. For the prototype and historic analysis
scraping Bugzilla/Jira/Trac seems sufficient, for a live look at the current state
of the project thats not going to work, would need some update subscription mechanism.
For GNOME it is based on the existing extracts:
http://academic.patrick.wagstrom.net/research/gnome
http://msr.uwaterloo.ca/msr2009/challenge/msrchallengedata.html
http://passion-lab.org/download
Also:http://mail.gnome.org/archives/academia-list/2010-October/thread.html#00002

Audris

On 11/21/2011 05:08 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
Missed
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Audris Mockus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-21T15:51:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2354">
    <title>Re: Fwd: A question related to issue resolution practices in Gnome</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad/2354</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;First impressions.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 06:37:46PM -0500, Audris Mockus wrote:

Seems quite interesting. However, due note that there are multiple teams
involved with Bugzilla:
1) bugmasters
   very small group of administrators
2) bugsquad
   loosely connected group of people who triage bugs
3) maintainers/developers
4) users

The entire triage process is decided by bugsquad themselves. I've cc'ed
gnome-bugsquad as I think they'll be interested in this email as well.
That is a public mailing list btw.


I will need to look into that a bit more, need more time for that.


For me, yes! Though thorough analysis needs to be done. Sometimes the
data might indicate one thing, while practically something else happens.


Ideally it should be built into Pe2. How does Pe2 gather its data btw?


I'd like to see:
- how often are bugs closed as incomplete
- buggyness of GNOME in general over time
- pareto chart of top crashing products
- all duplicate crashers should be detected automatically
- crashers should not be filed at bugzilla, instead they should be on
  some separate server which only task is to handle the crashers
- separate server should forward to bugzilla
- pareto chart of products where no action seems to be taken (indicating
  need to ask maintainer, or lack of maintainer)
- anything that indicates sudden trend break, be it positive or negative
  e.g.: suddenly there are way more bugs fixed for a product than usual,
  or opposite


There are some problems with bug-buddy:
- the retrace server is broken, so the change of version 2.19 is broken
- we should let the retracing be done by the distribution

There are plans to change the crash handling significantly. See:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Oops
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeOS/Design/Whiteboards/ProblemReporting

The designers+maintainers want to provide a well integrated problem
reporting infrastructure. GNOME is becoming more and more integrated
with the OS. OS problems affect the perception people have of GNOME.
E.g. if suspend doesn't work, GNOME will be seen as bad. We (GNOME)
should work to ensure such lower level problems can be detected,
reported and fixed.


This relies on two things:
- bugsquad to triage the bugs and 
- maintainers to fix the bug

Would also be nice to see it in a control chart. Though think the data
is not stable. E.g. new GNOME means new crashers (I assume). Same for
when a new distribution is released.


Ideally I'd like to see the number of crashers per amount of hours spend
in the software. But that is impossible to gather at the moment.

See for instance:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/products/Firefox

That has crashers per 100 users, also quite interesting.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Olav Vitters</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-21T10:08:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

