<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies">
    <title>gmane.os.openbsd.newbies</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2328"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2326"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2325"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2324"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2323"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2322"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2321"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2320"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2319"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2317"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2316"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2315"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2314"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2313"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2312"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2311"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2310"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2309"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2308"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2307"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2328">
    <title>Re: varieties of hostname</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2328</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;HiHi Dave!


I *knew* this had to be an easy Q and didn't require a rocket science answer, so that's why I posted it to -newbies. :)





BINGO!!!!!!!!!! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! This was the one last detail I -missed-, moving from AT&amp;amp;T DSL to Uverse. I had this same issue with last two previous AT&amp;amp;T DSL installations. I actually did used to run my own bind years ago but for me it was way too much work and one of the few non-fun internet features. Since netsol started doing DNS I never had to bother with it again, just have to nag AT&amp;amp;T to install the reverse. But I've dealt with this issue only maybe 3x in 10 years and that's why I *forgot* about it.


(Added later...) Well, yes that definitely had to be part of it. Took a few minutes but they added it immediately.


But there was another problem, because outbound still didn't work. Spent another fwe hours with tech support. After it was identified and fixed (in their configs) I called AT&amp;amp;T and got a real manager on to listen to me *RA&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Barchuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T14:04:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2326">
    <title>Re: varieties of hostname</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2326</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Speaking of DNS, I see this: &amp;lt;snipped a little&amp;gt;

[djv&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;aemilia ~ 1:393]$ dig jbarchuk.com   


;; ANSWER SECTION:
jbarchuk.com.           7200    IN      A       99.28.54.137

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
jbarchuk.com.           172800  IN      NS      ns74.worldnic.com.
jbarchuk.com.           172800  IN      NS      ns73.worldnic.com.

...for the forward and this for the reverse:

[djv&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;aemilia ~ 1:394]$ dig -x 99.28.54.137

; &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; DiG 9.4.2-P2 &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; -x 99.28.54.137
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -&amp;gt;&amp;gt;HEADER&amp;lt;&amp;lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34608
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;137.54.28.99.in-addr.arpa.     IN      PTR

;; ANSWER SECTION:
137.54.28.99.in-addr.arpa. 7097 IN      PTR     99-28-54-137.uvs.dybhfl.sbcglobal.net.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
54.28.99.in-addr.arpa.  172697  IN      NS      ns1.swbell.net.
54.28.99.in-addr.arpa.  172697  IN      NS      ns3.sbcglobal.net.
54.28.99.in-addr.arpa.  172697  IN      NS      ns2.swbell.ne&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Woodchuck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T19:51:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2325">
    <title>Re: varieties of hostname</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2325</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Typically email it should (nearly) all be in the sendmail 
configuration.  I wouldn't touch anything else, except for perhaps 
resolv.conf.  (And even there I'd only touch it if the box doesn't have 
any DNS lookups going on, which for a mail server I'd consider 
*extremely* unlikely.)  I haven't worked with sendmail (I just replace 
it), but Postfix I know can receive email for multiple domains as well 
as the local box, using nothing more than it's own config and the 
correct entries in DNS.

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Staal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T17:23:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2324">
    <title>varieties of hostname</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2324</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All!
New OBSD 5.0 install, and by -several- symptoms I think I'm having a lower level 'server identity' issue.

With all the years I used RH (since 4.1) and then moved to OBSD 4.4, I was *never* truly 'forced' to conform to an individual specific 'hostname.' About all I've ever run is one PC running all server stuff with not much LANning. This was the first install that absolutely insisted that I not leave it either blank, or not be able to later -easily- change it from host.domain.com to domain.com. OK so I can go along with that and set it to srv01. (I have a few LAN PCs around here but no other true servers.)

By 'easily change it' I mean that I notice that install uses hostname to create several /etc/ssh configuration files.  I hesitate to -just- edit /etc/myname because I think that might interfere with authentication. Not sure, but I don't want to mess with anything I don't know a bunch about.

My main concern at the moment is email, which I can neither send nor receive. Within the LAN I can SSH to&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Barchuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T15:07:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2323">
    <title>Re: varieties of hostname</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2323</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;More clues.

From a LAN PC, 'telnet 99.28.54.137 25' fails with 'Connecting To 99.28.54.137...Could not open connection to the host, on port 25,' but I'm less concerned with that right now.

On the plus side, at the console telnet plus sending an email locally worked fine.

However when I logged in it replied:

250- jbarchuk.com Hello jb2localhost... which is -not- /etc/myname, so unsure what it meant.

Then I recalled that as part of trying to identify myself properly I added several names to /etc/hosts. I listed jbarchuk.com as the first name. Previously that had no effect (in terms of accepting/sending email.) Now I see that the -first- name after 99.28.54.137 is how it identified itself. I can change the EHLO response at will.

But again I don't know if that can cause authentication problems if it 'disagrees' with /etc/myname, and the ssh configs. Maybe I need to create a new SSH config for -each- name I use???

I'm trying to swim with the current, not fight it. :) :)


Thanks much. Have a :) day!

Jim
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Barchuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T15:46:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2322">
    <title>Re: mount old drive problem with mount/disklabel/fdisk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2322</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
SATA drive? It should be sd* then. Is your BIOS in fake-IDE mode? Check
your dmesg, or equivalently (but somewhat more usefully) do tail
-f /var/log/messages.log and plug the drive in and see if it spits out
anything when you do that.


The disklabel and the mbr are separate records. If there isn't a proper
disklabel then OpenBSD generates a fake in-kernel disklabel based on the
MBR (e.g. for thumbdrives) but that's the exception, not the rule. It
looks like your disklabel got overwritten, and since there's only an
OpenBSD partition in the MBR, OpenBSD created that fake disklabel for
you. I'm unsure how to check for if a disklabel actually resides on a
disk or not (without resorting to low-level scanning and parsing of C
structs), and disklabel(8) just says
  "The kernel's in-core copy of the label is displayed; if the disk has
no label, or the partition types on the disk are incorrect, the kernel
may have constructed or modified the label."
 which is somewhat unhelpful.

..that sucks. If switching your BIO&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T19:17:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2321">
    <title>Re: mount old drive problem with mount/disklabel/fdisk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2321</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I assume you think the drive is empty.  The disklabel suggests
that the drive has been wiped clean of data.  If you're expecting
that there is data on the drive, say old files, then something
is wrong, and the kernel cannot read the disklabel and is using
its own notions.

Look in your dmesg output, see if the kernel probed it.

Get the output of   dmesg | grep wd

You should see all your drives.  (Three or more, right?)

Assuming this is a wiped drive and you want to use it, then
the rest of the email applies.  If, however, you think this
drive should have existing filesystems and files on it, you
have, as they say, a Problem.

/dev/wd2c is not a file system, it is a reference to the entire drive.

You need to create one or more partitions with disklabel on that
drive, and then run newfs on those partitions.  I recommend the
-E option to disklabel.  

If you wish to just use the drive for data, you can make
a partition, say "a" to cover the drive.  Make it of fstype
"4.2BSD", which is the default anyway.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Woodchuck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T14:53:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2320">
    <title>mount old drive problem with mount/disklabel/fdisk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2320</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi

I just updated to 5.0, and I'm trying to mount an old sata drive which 
use to hold my home directories and keep getting the following;

# mount -t ffs /dev/wd2a /home/kim/mount_point/
mount_ffs: /dev/wd2a on /home/kim/mount_point: Device not configured


looking at it with disklabel I get the following, which seems rather odd?


# disklabel -h wd2
# /dev/rwd2c:
type: ESDI
disk: ESDI/IDE disk
label: ST3500641AS
duid: 0000000000000000
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 60801
total sectors: 976773168 # total bytes: 465.8G
boundstart: 64
boundend: 976768065
drivedata: 0

16 partitions:
#                size           offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
   c:           465.8G                0  unused

looking at the drive with fdisk I can see the partition

# fdisk wd2
Disk: wd2       geometry: 60801/255/63 [976773168 Sectors]
Offset: 0       Signature: 0xAA55
             Starting         Ending         LBA Info:
  #: id      C   H   S -      C  &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T13:11:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2319">
    <title>Re: Epiphany crashes reliably</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2319</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
ulimit -f is a file size limit, see ksh(1) for a description of ulimit
options. You need ulimit -n. If it's too low, edit login.conf and find
the relevant openfiles-cur for the class your userid is in. Logout and
back in again to use the new limits.

If this isn't enough, you could also be running into system limits.

$ sysctl kern.{n,max}files
kern.nfiles=315
kern.maxfiles=7030

kern.maxfiles can be raised temporarily (sysctl kern.maxfiles=NN) or at
boot in /etc/sysctl.conf.

fstat will show you what's open. Try something like "fstat | grep
-c username" for a quick estimate of what you're using.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Henderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T15:03:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2317">
    <title>Wireless bridge Question</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2317</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Everybody.

I hope I can clearly explain my problem.
I want to solve this with on hand hardware.

I have a firewall/router in a locked cabinet in the basement.
It's running OpenBSD 5.0 Current.
I also have some 2-Wire brand 1700 and 2700 series DSL
routers lying around.

I need a wireless access point upstairs, out of range of a
wireless card in my firewall/router.

I want to run a wired network connection from my firewall/router
upstairs to one of my 2-Wire routers to act as a wireless access
point.

BUT...
I want the DHCP leases to be handled by the wired NIC in my
firewall/router, and have the 2-Wire router ONLY act as nothing more
than a "bridge" (if that's the correct term).

Is this possible?
                              Thanks for any input,  Ed
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ed  D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-21T17:28:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2316">
    <title>test</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2316</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;test
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>kaspop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-22T17:12:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2315">
    <title>Re: Kernel pppoe STILL broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2315</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Just out of curiosity, are these errors on boot-up, or later in the
game?  If on boot-up, you might consider not starting named
until later.

216.239.38.10  -- this is a number at google.  I wouldn't give a
nickel for the reliability of google's services of any kind.  Why is
your named trying to get hold of google's?

No help, I know, just questions.

You're scaring me from installing 4.9.

Dave
--
"All money nowadays seems to be produced with a natural
homing instinct for the Treasury."  -- Prince Phillip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Woodchuck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-28T03:20:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2314">
    <title>Re:  Kernel pppoe STILL broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2314</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

On 27 Jun 2011 at 23:10, Ed  D. wrote

With this latest fix, kernel mode pppoe is improved
but still broken in my case.
having worked without problem until 4.9 stable.


When I got back in town, I upgraded to amd64 -current
on Friday 6-24-11.

The assertwaitok panic doesn't occur anymore on bootup.

However, when the DSL connection drops, the error
still occurs.

I'm still having to use usermode pppoe to keep my DSL
connection going.

Example from /var/log/mesages

Jun 25 00:21:59 meenon /bsd: pppoe0: LCP keepalive timeout
Jun 25 00:21:59 meenon /bsd: splassert: assertwaitok: want -1 have 1
Jun 25 00:22:00 meenon named[13407]: 
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/lib/isc/unix/socket.c:1218: unexpected error:
Jun 25 00:22:00 meenon named[13407]: internal_send: 216.239.38.10#53: 
Network is down
Jun 25 00:22:01 meenon named[13407]: 
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/lib/isc/unix/socket.c:1218: unexpected error:
Jun 25 00:22:01 meenon named[13407]: internal_send: 202.12.27.33#53: 
Network is down
Jun 25 00:22:01 meenon named[13407]:&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ed  D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-28T03:09:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2313">
    <title>Re: FIXED? Kernel pppoe broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2313</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Was just checking the -Current Changelog and
noticed:
"Fixed an assertwaitok panic in sppp(4). "

When I get back in town I'll upgrade my
firewall/router to -Current and report
back the results.
                                     Ed

On 15 Jun 2011 at 10:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ed  D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-21T18:03:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2312">
    <title>Re: Kernel pppoe broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2312</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
It's not totally broken, but it is broken in your particular
situation. If it was easier to reproduce it would already be fixed.

$ shmux -c 'ifconfig pppoe|grep ^pppoe;uptime' jodrell mylor2-gw
  jodrell: pppoe0: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; mtu 1492
  jodrell: 10:05AM  up 6 days, 17:51, 1 user, load averages: 0.13, 0.13, 0.08
mylor2-gw: pppoe3: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; mtu 1492
mylor2-gw: pppoe4: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; mtu 1492
mylor2-gw: pppoe6: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; mtu 1492
mylor2-gw: pppoe7: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; mtu 1492
mylor2-gw:  9:06AM  up 36 days, 20:57, 0 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.11, 0.22

These machines are totally stable, despite some of the pppoe's on
mylor2-gw here having dropped the connection hundreds of times since
the machine booted.

$ ssh mylor2-gw 'ifconfig pppoe7|grep -e ^pppoe -e time'
pppoe7: flags=8851&amp;lt;UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Henderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-15T09:11:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2311">
    <title>Re: Kernel pppoe broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2311</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;So I infer from the lack of any further responses that
kernel mode pppoe is broken for OpenBSD 4.9 Stable,
and the only way to have a working pppoe is to go back
to using the user mode pppoe (8)?
(which I had done when I first posted this thread)
                                       Thanks,  Ed

On 7 Jun 2011 at 12:47, Ed  D. wrote:

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ed  D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-14T06:51:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2310">
    <title>Re: boot.conf on mac ppc</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2310</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
He has a macppc...  do a man for boot.conf, and one doesn't exist.
_______________________________________________
Openbsd-newbies mailing list
Openbsd-newbies&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;sfobug.theapt.org
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-09T20:57:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2309">
    <title>Re: boot.conf on mac ppc</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2309</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=boot.conf&amp;amp;apropos=0&amp;amp;sektion=0&amp;amp;manpath=OpenBSD+Current&amp;amp;arch=i386&amp;amp;format=html

:-)
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bryan Irvine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-09T18:38:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2308">
    <title>boot.conf on mac ppc</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2308</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm running 4.9 STABLE on a PPC Mac Powerbook 15".

OpenFirmware is set for autoboot and the boot device is hd:,ofwboot.

The box boots correctly: a start or reboot drops me into an OBSD boot 
prompt that lasts for five seconds.  I'd like to control the length of 
time that the boot prompt is on the screen with the boot.conf "timeout" 
keyword.

This works, of course, on the i386 port (you can set "timeout" to 0, and 
override it by holding down one of the keys during boot), but macppc 
throws out any timeout boot.conf configuration with an error message.

Does boot.conf work on macppc?  If so, is there a difference in the 
syntax from i386?

Alternatively, can the length of time the secondary boot prompt 
(ofwboot) is on the screen be controlled from OpenFirmware? (I 
understand they're two different processes.)

Thanks for any help.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Satyriasis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-09T15:40:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2307">
    <title>Re: Kernel pppoe broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2307</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Thanks for the reply.

Actually the thread you gave me is one of the ones I found when
I Googled.
But when I read it through to the end, there doesn't appear to be
a clear agreed on solution to this.

But something has changed from OpenBSD 4.8 Stable and 4.9
Stable that makes kernel pppoe not work right anymore.for me.

I can reproduce this problem at will by simply unplugging the
phone line or ethernet cable from my DSL modem.

I've been jusing kernel mode pppoe for several versions and
it's been bulletproof for me until 4.9  Stable.
                                                          Thanks, Ed

On 7 Jun 2011 at 7:42, Bryan wrote:


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ed  D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-07T16:47:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2306">
    <title>Re: Kernel pppoe broken my OpenBSD 4.9 and64</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.newbies/2306</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Maybe you didn't google hard enough...  always check MARC

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&amp;amp;m=129542722106887&amp;amp;w=2

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 22:24, Ed  D. &amp;lt;lists&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;rensseltucky.com&amp;gt; wrote:
_______________________________________________
Openbsd-newbies mailing list
Openbsd-newbies&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;sfobug.theapt.org
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-07T12:42:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.os.openbsd.newbies">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.os.openbsd.newbies</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

