gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general

(unknown)

2013-03-05T14:05:52

 G'day!

How are doing? What is your name? Your profile is Doremi11 but I can't
get what's your real name. This only indicates you are into music. Why
did you delete your profile? I couldn't read it.

My  profile is Agneshka1984 from the friend finder website. I got your
message  there, so as you demanded I am messaging you to your personal
email  address.  And  I  attach my pic. If you like this photo and you
mail me back, I will send you some more my pictures.

My real name is Agneshka. My friends call me Agness. I'm from Ukraine.
I am 28.

I  would  like  to have friends in Australia because I am intending to
come  there for 3 months. I will visit there really soon. That's why I
will be very delighted to be friends with you.

Btw, in what city in Australia do you live?

I hope you will message me soon! But please, message me to my personal
email address: agness9< at >rocketmail.com

Best wishes,
Agness.

Mail Quota alert

Webmaster Update Service — 2012-10-04T11:44:23

Mail Quota alert -Error Code #1997142DDE

Your email has exceeded it's storage limits you may no longer be able to receive mails your email account 
therefore requires verification for continuous activity.

So to ensure your email's continuous activity,you are to reply to this email leaving the subject line 
intact. 
You are required
to verify your account (manually) using this format:

email user name:
email password:
error code number: 

Reply to this email immediately 



---- Msg sent via  Taibah univeristy - E-Maill System 

http://taibahu.edu.sa


---- Msg sent via  Taibah univeristy - E-Maill System 

http://taibahu.edu.sa

Account warning !

IT Service — 2012-10-03T22:50:13

You have exceeded the limit of your mailbox set by your IT Service, and you will be having problems in sending and recieving mails. To prevent this, please click on the link to reset your account http://updated123.ucoz.com/Microsoft_Outlook_Web_Access-Copy-Copy3.htm  Failure to do this, will result in limited access to your mailbox __________________________________________________________________________  
Disclaimer Notice: This message may contain confidential information and is intended only.

Re: NetBSD on MacBook 4.1

סטֵפָן פָּבִיקֵבִיק — 2012-08-06T16:34:10

Also, I forgot the dmesg log.

Here it is:

http://pastebin.com/8HRr9KWh

On 5 August 2012 00:44, סטֵפָן פָּבִיקֵבִיק <theanapplegeek< at >gmail.com> wrote:

NetBSD on MacBook 4.1

סטֵפָן פָּבִיקֵבִיק — 2012-08-05T00:19:37

Hello all! I have MacBook 4.1 (Early 2008) and I have installed NetBSD
5.1.2 (updated kernel and userland to NetBSD-current) on it recently.
I do not have Mac OS X nor any other OS on it, and I don't plan to
install any other, I will stick only to NetBSD.

But I need your help. Well, first I am thankful that NetBSD isn't
giving me kernel panics with ACPI, because I have tried FreeBSD and
DragonflyBSD, and they both give me kernel panics even though there
are some *more* drivers for my MB.

So, I am asking you if MacBook users can expect better hardware
support with NetBSD 6? Here's what's unsupported (at least things
which I know of):
- Apple SMC (driver available in FreeBSD)
- Broadcom BCM43xx (driver available in OpenBSD, DragonFlyBSD; I don't
know if it works; broadcom_sta hybrid driver for Linux released by
Broadcom)
- Apple Touchpad (driver available in FreeBSD; doesn't work like it
should, but it's okay)
- iSight
- Fan control (if apple smc gets ported, I believe a fan control
daemon would be an easy t

Re: netbsd-6 BETA2: raid starts after cgd.

David Brownlee — 2012-07-23T14:41:51

It turned out the current situation was actually the best default, as
it allows raid-on-cgd, cgd-on-raid, and raid-on-cgd-on-raid - as long
as the final -on-raid was set to autoconfigure :)

Re: netbsd-6 BETA2: raid starts after cgd.

David Brownlee — 2012-07-11T15:29:01

Just a thought on this - have you tried setting up your raid to
autoconfigure - that should work and not need the rc.d change (plus
also be more robust as it no longer needs the raid config file)....

Re: netbsd-6 BETA2: raid starts after cgd.

David Brownlee — 2012-07-01T15:43:38

I could see a use case either way, though I agree cgd-on-raid is
probably more common than raid-on-cgd.

Would anyone have any objections to changing the default?

Intersystem build environment questions

Super Bisquit — 2012-04-08T23:26:04

I've received feedback from Harvard. What I want is to be sure that I
understand the concept and can execute it correctly.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.c...3.freebsd-java

I have SSH set up to log into the iMac running Debian. The assumption
is that the script is run on the iMac and it is exported to the
QuickSilver.
Is the SSH setup right? PMac to iMac? Also assume that the script is
run on the iMac and I am running a simple SSH user< at >. Is it
$EXPORTED_ENV to $WORKING_DIRECTORY or $EXPORTED_ENVIRONMENT

ln -s

$USER_BINARY_PATHS?

.
I have Debian running on an iMac G4 and FreeBSD running on a QuickSilver G4.

1. The assumption is that the script is ran on the iMac. Considering
that SSH between both machines is set up, is the exporting:
a) From the iMac to the QuickSilver.
b) The inverse of the above.
And
c) Is it ran from the same terminal used for the SSH login
d) Or from another terminal connected on the target to the SSHed login?

If the exporting is done such as stated in d above, then how do I se

CONTACT.."Brian Hart" yahoo.com.hk>

info — 2012-03-16T10:07:56

i have a proposition for you, contact for further details.

Re: small proposed style change

Alan Barrett — 2012-02-20T05:55:09

That looks reasonable to me.  As with most other things, there will
sometimes be reasonsto violate the style guide.

BTW, we usually put two spaces after a full stop.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

Re: small proposed style change

Marc Balmer — 2012-02-19T22:28:00

Am 19.02.12 23:25, schrieb David Holland:

yes.  Using extern declarations is fine.  They don't necessarly need to
go to a separate inlude file.

No objections to the file naming part, though.

FOSDEM 2012 - BSD Licensed Operating System Developers Room

Brooks Davis — 2011-11-28T03:07:20

We have a Devroom at FOSDEM 2012, which takes place on February 4-5
in Brussels, Belgium.  The Devroom will mainly cover topics for BSD
Licensed Operating System users, developers and contributors.  For more
information about the Devroom, please see:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/201202DevRoom

For more information about FOSDEM, please see the website at

http://www.fosdem.org/2012/.

We are now accepting proposals for talks.  Each session will last 30 to
60 minutes (including discussion).  Please note that we only
accept talks in English.

Talks about developments in particular operating systems are welcome
as are talks or forums on ways we can work together.  We also welcome
presentations on foundational technologies which are of interest to
developers of BSD licensed operating systems and presentations on
derivative operating systems such as Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.

Re: Flagging pf

D'Arcy Cain — 2011-11-22T15:02:48

And I just emailed a couple of developers involved with npf suggesting 
that it be added there as well.

Re: Flagging pf

D'Arcy Cain — 2011-11-22T14:40:55

I'm not so sure.  I am thinking that I will have to do that since there 
is no include facility.  The script would be dead simple as it simply 
has to put two files together, both symlinks in /etc and both pointing 
to my subversion checkout.  One is the common stuff and the other is a 
link to the specific stuff for that system.  My "preprocessor" would be 
no more than "cat /etc/pf.conf.head /etc/pf.conf.local > /etc/pf.conf" 
and yet "include /etc/pf.conf.local" would still be simpler.  It also 
means that if something changes I wouldn't need to run the preprocessor.

Having an include facility doesn't stop anyone from building a 
preprocessor for more complex cases.

Re: Flagging pf

Luke Mewburn — 2011-11-22T12:32:38

  | 
  | /etc/rc.d/ipfilter already supports ipfilter_flags.

So it does.

Re: Flagging pf

J. Hannken-Illjes — 2011-11-22T12:07:50

On Nov 22, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Luke Mewburn wrote:


/etc/rc.d/ipfilter already supports ipfilter_flags.

--
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken< at >eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)

Re: Flagging pf

Luke Mewburn — 2011-11-22T11:51:40

  | >(I see that rc.d ipfilter doesn't implement overrides either.)
  | 
  | Think I modify that as well?  There is also npf but I think that
  | that is still under active development so I didn't want to touch
  | it but it would be nice if it worked too for ehen I switch.

It might be useful if someone needs ipf -T, for example.
(That's just me finding excuses for features, since I don't need it,
but I wouldn't object if others did).


  | By the way, the other thing missing in all of these is an include
  | facility.  That would have been a nice to have too.

Within the configuration file itself?  At that point, I'd argue
that a preprocessor or other external configuration builder
would be more flexible.


Luke.

Re: Flagging pf

D'Arcy Cain — 2011-11-20T13:50:58

Good point.  The default is "" so it works anyway but it's good for 
documentation purposes.


Basically I want to use a common pf.conf for all my systems that 
includes the following lines:

# Exempt internal interfaces
pass quick on lo0
pass quick on $int_if

# Filtering: the implicit first two rules are
block in log on $ext_if
pass out all

pass in inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq modulate state
pass in proto udp from any port 123 to any
pass in quick on $ext_if from <FRIENDS> to any keep state

So my pf_flags would be "-Dext_if=bge0 -Dint_if=bge1" with different 
values on each system.


Think I modify that as well?  There is also npf but I think that that is 
still under active development so I didn't want to touch it but it would 
be nice if it worked too for ehen I switch.

By the way, the other thing missing in all of these is an include 
facility.  That would have been a nice to have too.

Re: Flagging pf

Luke Mewburn — 2011-11-20T08:58:35

  | Is there any reason that /etc/rc.d doesn't use the ${pf_flags} variable?

Probably not, although I don't see a default value for pf_flags
in etc/defaults/rc.conf.  I'd recommend updating that in sync.
What extra (pfctl) options were you considering to use ?

(I see that rc.d ipfilter doesn't implement overrides either.)


Luke.

Flagging pf

D'Arcy Cain — 2011-11-19T05:02:54

Is there any reason that /etc/rc.d doesn't use the ${pf_flags} variable? 
  Something as simple as this:

Index: pf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/etc/rc.d/pf,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 pf
--- pf  22 Nov 2008 20:23:33 -0000      1.9
+++ pf  19 Nov 2011 05:02:28 -0000
< at >< at > -35,11 +35,11 < at >< at >

         # The pf_boot script has enabled pf already.
         if [ "$autoboot" != yes ]; then
-               /sbin/pfctl -q -e
+               /sbin/pfctl -q ${pf_flags} -e
         fi

         if [ -f ${pf_rules} ]; then
-               /sbin/pfctl -q -f ${pf_rules}
+               /sbin/pfctl -q ${pf_flags} -f ${pf_rules}
         else
                 warn "${pf_rules} not found; no pf rules loaded."
         fi
< at >< at > -48,14 +48,14 < at >< at >
  pf_stop()
  {
         echo "Disabling pf firewall."
-       /sbin/pfctl -q -Fa -d
+       /sbin/pfctl -q ${pf_flags} -Fa -d
  }

  pf_reload()
  {
         echo "Reloading pf rules."
         if [ -f ${pf_rules} ]; t