gmane.os.freebsd.devel.python

python33-3.3.2 Parser/pgen: Permission denied

2013-05-19T01:09:00

  

http://bugs.python.org/issue18008 [1] 

Hi 

I am reporting a bug
on: python33-3.3.2 Parser/pgen: Permission denied 

Can you help on
this: 

Thank's 

William Moreno 
  

Links:
------
[1]
http://bugs.python.org/issue18008

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-05-18T13:04:54

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/python< at >freebsd.org.html


Port                                            | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
databases/py-gdbm                               | 2.7.5           | 3.3.2
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.fre

Re: ports/178738: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise

Edwin Groothuis — 2013-05-18T12:30:01

The following reply was made to PR ports/178738; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin< at >FreeBSD.org>
To: gslin< at >gslin.org
Cc: bug-followup< at >FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/178738: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:20:09 UT

 Maintainer of databases/py-swift,

 Please note that PR ports/178738 has just been submitted.

 If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix
 you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch
 and a committer will take care of it.

 The full text of the PR can be found at:
     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/178738

 -- 
 Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool
 edwin< at >FreeBSD.org

Re: ports/178738: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise

2013-05-18T12:20:10

Synopsis: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: edwin
State-Changed-When: Sat May 18 12:20:10 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why: 
Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=178738

Re: ports/178738: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise

2013-05-18T12:20:09

Synopsis: databases/py-swift: add rc.d script and fix posix_fadvise

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat May 18 12:20:08 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
freebsd-python< at > wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=178738

Re: ports/160717: port: lang/python27 causing other ports to hang during configure?

2013-05-18T11:31:53

Synopsis: port: lang/python27 causing other ports to hang during configure?

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rm
State-Changed-When: Sat May 18 11:31:53 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why: 
Kris, is this still the case? I wasn't able to reproduce this on
different versions of FreeBSD with different python versions (2.7.3 and
2.7.5) for both ports

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160717

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-05-17T14:43:22

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/python< at >freebsd.org.html


Port                                            | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
databases/py-bsddb                              | 2.7.5           | 3.3.2
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
databases/py-sqlite3                            | 2.7.5           | 3.3.2
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
devel/py-distribute

Re: ports/153167: Problem with signals, threads, and subprocesses in lang/python

2013-05-17T04:20:56

Synopsis: Problem with signals, threads, and subprocesses in lang/python

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: rm
State-Changed-When: Fri May 17 04:20:56 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why: 
Issue was resolved in r318353. Thank you!

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153167

Re: ports/153167: commit references a PR

dfilter service — 2013-05-17T04:20:01

The following reply was made to PR ports/153167; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dfilter< at >FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service)
To: bug-followup< at >FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/153167: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 04:17:44 +0000 (UTC)

 Author: rm
 Date: Fri May 17 04:17:22 2013
 New Revision: 318353
 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/318353
 
 Log:
   - update to latest upstream versions:
     . lang/python27: 2.7.3 -> 2.7.5
     . lang/python32: 3.2.3 -> 3.2.4
     . lang/python33: 3.3.0 -> 3.3.1
   - update Mk/bsd.python.mk with new versions
   - mark lang/python26 and lang/python31 as deprecated (set them to
     upstream EoL dates)
   - update docs (lang/python-doc-html)
   - align databases/py-bsddb patch for python27 - most of it was applied
     upstream. Raise BDB version to 4.3 atleast, according to
     upstream requirements.
   
   Many thanks to Martin (miwi) for his time on this update.
   
   PR:178506
   Submitted by:rm (myself)
   Exp-run by:    portmgr (miwi

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-05-16T08:59:41

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/python< at >freebsd.org.html


Port                                            | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
devel/mercurial                                 | 2.6             | 2.6.1
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.fre

Re: Multiple Python eggs within one port

Matthias Petermann — 2013-05-16T06:54:06

Hi Chis,

Zitat von Chris Rees <utisoft< at >gmail.com>:


at least I guess have seen such configurations e.g. for the gnome  
desktop(?). So do you mean, there is one master port which causes the  
~50 ports to build in sequence? This would make sense as an addition  
to the current approach.

My concern was about the number of single ports. Currently, Tryton  
provides ~50 modules/eggs, for each a single port. Currently we are  
planning to support 2...3 tryton versions in parallel within the  
ports. This would even grow this number to ~150. I worked with a  
committer on this and he mentioned, that portsmgr might be not too  
happy about such a large number just for a relatively small  
application. That's why I considered to bundle the eggs into one port.  
But response from portsmgr is still open, maybe they don't see an  
issue with this.

Best regards,
Matthias

Re: Multiple Python eggs within one port

Chris Rees — 2013-05-15T14:23:22

a single port? And is there already an example in ports, where I can grab
ideas how to achive this?
framework which consists of ~50 small modules. Currently each of them has
its own port. I might bundle them together on one port to simplify
maintenance.

Usually a master/slave configuration is more appropriate.  Are you familiar
with those?

Chris

Multiple Python eggs within one port

Matthias Petermann — 2013-05-15T13:57:38

Dear FreeBSD Python Community,

is there any best practise how multiple Python eggs could be bundled  
into a single port? And is there already an example in ports, where I  
can grab ideas how to achive this?

Background of my question is that I maintain the Tryton application  
framework which consists of ~50 small modules. Currently each of them  
has its own port. I might bundle them together on one port to simplify  
maintenance.

Thanks in advance and kind regards,
Matthias

Re: Patch for python twitter api GetTrendsCurrent

dan mansfield — 2013-05-15T06:40:51

Hello Ruslan,

Sorry about forgetting to attach. Yes that is the patch.

Regards,

Daniel

On 5/15/13, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src< at >yandex.ru> wrote:

Re: Patch for python twitter api GetTrendsCurrent

Ruslan Makhmatkhanov — 2013-05-15T06:12:44

Kubilay Kocak wrote on 15.05.2013 07:57:

It looks like this one is the solution:
https://code.google.com/p/python-twitter/issues/detail?id=231

Re: Patch for python twitter api GetTrendsCurrent

Kubilay Kocak — 2013-05-15T03:57:24

Hi Daniel,

No patch attached to your original email :)

--
Ta,

Koobs

Patch for python twitter api GetTrendsCurrent

dan mansfield — 2013-05-15T02:34:49

Dearest Port Maintainer,

The method GetTrendsCurrent is broken in net/py-twitter. It seems as
though Twitter has changed their API. The attached patch fixes this
issue.

Regards,

Daniel

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-05-13T13:11:39

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/python< at >freebsd.org.html


Port                                            | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
devel/py-distribute                             | 0.6.35          | 0.6.39
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.fr

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-python< at >FreeBSD.org

FreeBSD bugmaster — 2013-05-13T11:06:50

Note: to view an individual PR, use:
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).

The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.


S Tracker      Resp.      Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o ports/178301 python     [patch] lang/python2[67]: SEM option is inconsistent
f ports/178256 python     [PATCH] Unbreak math/py-numpy with python 3.3 and upda
o ports/178242 python     bsd.python.mk injection of < at >exec easy_install to PLIST
f ports/178094 python     math/py-numpy dependency on atlas assumes existing ins
f ports/178008 python     www/py-djangotoolbox: unfetchable distfile, fragile
o ports/176714 python     games/py-fife: fixed make package
f ports/174242 python     Update to databases/py-odbc
o ports/171584 python     lang/python32 built in a clean enviroment produces a p
o ports/171246 python

Re: ports/178522: [maintainer update] for graphics/py-openimageio

2013-05-12T16:29:46

Synopsis: [maintainer update] for graphics/py-openimageio

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-python->rm
Responsible-Changed-By: rm
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 12 16:29:46 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I will take it.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=178522

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-05-12T13:41:59

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/python< at >freebsd.org.html


Port                                            | Current version | New version
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------
lang/python27                                   | 2.7.3           | 2.7.5
------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.fre