gmane.network.jabber.psi.devel

About pubsub in Psi

Chu Lam Than Ban — 2013-05-14T22:47:44

I want to ask some questions about pubsub in Psi.
I found the PepManager in Psi that manage the Pubsub in xmpp. But it seems
not to be done completely?
I found that there are many funtions in this class was commented out and
couldnot be used? (For ex. function for creating new node...)
Where can I get full implement pubsub in Psi? Is it implemented In Psi++?
Would appreciate for any support..
DucTai

dbus org.psi_im.Psi.Main.sleep

Thomas B. Rücker — 2013-05-12T15:18:16

Hi,

I'm trying to debug why Psi doesn't go offline before my machine sleeps.

I've written a small script for pm-utils that sends the above mentioned
dbus message and made sure there is enough time before the signal to
NetworkManager is sent, but somehow only when I resume the machine it
tries to disconnect and then receives the 'wake' signal and reconnects.

Any ideas how to debug this?
Having it reconnect on waking up from sleep is already good, but having
it disconnect too would be even better.

Cheers

Thomas

PS: this is on debian wheezy/7 with gnome as the WM.

Re: Psi-Devel Digest, Vol 102, Issue 1

Justin Karneges — 2013-05-02T07:25:05

Yes, on Windows you have to be careful about mixing DLLs. If you build 
in debug mode, then generally all used libraries must also be built in 
debug mode. Make sure you have qcad2.dll (debug version) and that Psi is 
linking to that.

On 05/01/2013 07:06 PM, Chu Lam Than Ban wrote:

Re: Psi-Devel Digest, Vol 102, Issue 1

Chu Lam Than Ban — 2013-05-02T02:06:17

Hi, Justin,
I use the qca that I build my self, but I dont add qca code into my
project. I use it as external library (dll).
Maybe because of it I couldnot debug?
Thanks for immediately answer.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:10 AM, <psi-devel-request-SZZJV8XAoCNYvblgLrzaqAC/G2K4zDHf< at >public.gmane.org> wrote:

Re: Cannot debug Psi 0.16

Justin Karneges — 2013-05-01T19:00:12

Did you build qca yourself or use a prebuilt package?

Justin

Cannot debug Psi 0.16

Chu Lam Than Ban — 2013-05-01T03:10:43

Hi all Psi community.
I could  build the Psi, but I couldnot debug it... I think it is because of
Qca.
When I debugged to the QCA::KeyStoreManager keystoremgr; the Qt SDK show
the error of segmentation signal from OS. And many of the other things, the
sdk generate this error when debugging.
Do you know how can I solve this problem?

(in code of Psi 0.16, I see the value of Version still 0.15-dev)

I use Window 7 (32bit), Qt Creator 2.0.1, base on 4.7.0 (32 bit)

Thank you in advance for any help.

DucTai.

certificate checking

Peter Saint-Andre — 2012-12-17T21:12:31

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I just installed a new certificate at jabber.org. With Psi 0.15 I
receive a certificate validation error. With Adium 1.5.4 I don't.
AFAICT, the only material difference between the old cert and the new
cert is that I requested a SHA-256 hash this time (also please note
that the common name is register.jabber.org, not jabber.org, but
jabber.org is also listed as a supported domain). Does Psi 0.15
support only SHA-1? Can someone else test with Psi and report their
experience? Feel free to ping me off-list.

Thanks.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlDPir8ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwoTwCgmPoo0vlNQL1R8ZoD3S6QErnO
3OcAnR7C6HyILo1dsc0Uvl036B/W9gin
=WMtL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: 0.15

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-11T00:10:19

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 11:33:55 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > Justin Karneges writes:
- > - Are you saying that without patching, the Makefile install target
- > - *is* referencing psi from the intended location (psi-0.15/psi),
- > - but that the executable is still being saved to psi-0.15/src/psi?
- > 
- > The executable is being built into psi-0.15/psi, but the install
- > target in psi-0.15/src/Makefile is expecting it to be in ".",
- > aka psi-0.15/src/psi.
- > 
- > In the Makefiles being generated here, ${QMAKE_TARGET} is defined
- > as "psi".  ${TARGET} is defined as ../../psi-0.15/psi, but the
- > install rule specifies ${QMAKE_TARGET}, and not ${TARGET}.
- > 
- > From my build log:
- > 
- > libtool --silent --mode=install cp "psi"
- > "/scratch/pkgsrc/obj/chat/psi/work/.destdir/usr/pkg/bin/" cp: psi: No such
- > file or directory
- > gmake: [install_target] Error 1 (ignored)
- 
- Maybe a Makefile-generation difference on NetBSD. Here's what I have in my 
- src/Make

Re: 0.15

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-08T20:13:45

Maybe a Makefile-generation difference on NetBSD. Here's what I have in my 
src/Makefile:

-$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) "../../psi/$(QMAKE_TARGET)"
  "$(INSTALL_ROOT)/usr/local/bin/$(QMAKE_TARGET)"

(this is all one line but I've wrapped and indented in the email)

It seems to be using QMAKE_TARGET here too, but appending it to a DESTDIR-
adjusted path.

Justin

Re: 0.15 sluggish?

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-08T20:07:35

By default, it builds in release mode. You can confirm this by looking at 
conf.pri after running configure and finding "CONFIG += release".


Yes, that sounds right. At least on Linux with the split debug data, the idea 
is that the app is really compiled in release mode but gcc will attempt to 
make debug information against that anyway, and save it in a separate file. In 
your case, it all seems to be going into a single file, but I'd think the 
result is otherwise the same and the app should effectively be in release mode.

Justin

Re: 0.15 sluggish?

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-08T05:38:27

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 06:35:42 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > Justin Karneges writes:
- > - > One thing I've found is that 0.15 feels quite sluggish on the
- > - > same hardware that ran 0.14 without issue.
- > - >
- > - > Any sugguestions where to look to locate the sluggishness?
- > -
- > - This is the first such report I'm aware of. Any chance the two were built
- > - differently?
- > 
- > Nope, the only change between the versions of the packages was
- > the version of Psi used. No explicit, intentional changes of
- > configuration, only any changes in the default configurations.
- > 
- > I note that the executable size has grown from about 88M to
- > almost 100M.
- 
- That's huge. Must be debug symbols? I built Psi in release mode
- with separated debug data I get a 7MB psi and 109MB psi.debug file.
- This is on Linux.

I thought it was huge too.. (although I've gotten used to seeing
GUI programs be gwadawfully huge.)

- Maybe you're not building in release mode? That c

Re: 0.15

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-08T05:33:55

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 06:38:54 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > Justin Karneges writes:
- > - Works fine here without a patch. Maybe something related to your
- > - build process?
- > 
- > If I may, what is "here"?
- 
- Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit.

I'll try to spin up a Ubuntu VM and see if I can replicate
there. (I've got a Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS sitting here, I'll try
that first..)

- > I'm running on NetBSD (UNIX), using the qmake to generate the
- > Makefiles.  When the resulting Makefiles are examined, and used,
- > the "install" target references ../psi (aka, psi-0.15/psi), but
- > the executable is ./psi (aka, psi-0.15/src/psi.)
- > 
- > In comparing with 0.14, the DESTDIR line is new.
- 
- Yes, 0.14 and prior would put the psi executable in the src
- directory (e.g.  psi-0.14/src/psi), and then put a symlink in
- the base directory that pointed to src/psi. With 0.15 onward, we
- now put the psi executable in the base directory and don't bother
- with the symlink anymore.
- 
- Are

Re: 0.15

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-08T01:36:48

Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit.


Yes, 0.14 and prior would put the psi executable in the src directory (e.g. 
psi-0.14/src/psi), and then put a symlink in the base directory that pointed 
to src/psi. With 0.15 onward, we now put the psi executable in the base 
directory and don't bother with the symlink anymore.

Are you saying that without patching, the Makefile install target *is* 
referencing psi from the intended location (psi-0.15/psi), but that the 
executable is still being saved to psi-0.15/src/psi?

Justin

Re: 0.15 sluggish?

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-08T01:06:13

That's huge. Must be debug symbols? I built Psi in release mode with separated 
debug data I get a 7MB psi and 109MB psi.debug file. This is on Linux.

Maybe you're not building in release mode? That could explain sluggishness.

Re: missing DnD/Away button?

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-08T01:01:30

Oh, you're right. That particular action seems to be gone now.

Filed: https://github.com/psi-im/psi/issues/45

Justin

Re: 0.15

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-08T00:38:54

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 05:18:16 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > Justin Karneges writes:
- > - The final release of 0.15 is here! The website has been updated:
- > -   http://psi-im.org/download/
- > 
- > It took me almost two months, but I'm about to update chat/psi
- > in pkgsrc (http://www.pkgsrc.org) to 0.15.
- > 
- > In order to have the install target work, I needed to make the
- > following patch: (also included as an attachment.)
- > 
- > --- src/src.pro.orig2012-10-04 00:53:03.000000000 +0000
- > +++ src/src.pro
- > < at >< at > -6,7 +6,6 < at >< at >
- >  TEMPLATE = app
- >  TARGET   = psi
- >  CONFIG  += qt thread x11
- > -DESTDIR  = $$PWD/..
- > 
- >  #CONFIG += use_crash
- >  CONFIG += pep
- > 
- > Someone may wish to update the source repository so that "make
- > install" in the psi-0.15 directory actually works.
- 
- Works fine here without a patch. Maybe something related to your
- build process?

If I may, what is "here"?

I'm running on NetBSD (UNIX), using the qmake to

Re: 0.15 sluggish?

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-08T00:35:42

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 05:26:28 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > I finished making pkgsrc packages for Psi 0.15 a week or so ago,
- > and have been using them personally before checking them into
- > the pkgsrc tree.
- > 
- > One thing I've found is that 0.15 feels quite sluggish on the
- > same hardware that ran 0.14 without issue.
- > 
- > Any sugguestions where to look to locate the sluggishness?
- 
- This is the first such report I'm aware of. Any chance the two were built 
- differently?

Nope, the only change between the versions of the packages was
the version of Psi used. No explicit, intentional changes of
configuration, only any changes in the default configurations.

I note that the executable size has grown from about 88M to
almost 100M.

--
Eric Schnoebeleneric-vt2WnZFqELQ< at >public.gmane.orghttp://www.cirr.com
There has been an alarming increase in the number of things
    you know nothing about.

Re: missing DnD/Away button?

Eric Schnoebelen — 2012-12-08T00:26:59

Justin Karneges writes:
- On Friday, December 07, 2012 05:27:48 PM Eric Schnoebelen wrote:
- > In my week or so's use of 0.15, I noticed that the button for
- > hiding/displaying DnD/away roster elements has disappeared.
- > 
- > Where did it go, and can we get it back?
- 
- I believe this has been gone by default for awhile, though it can
- be optionally enabled. Maybe you only noticed it missing now on a
- fresh config.  You can also enable the toolbuttons by going to
- options -> toolbars, selecting the "Show contacts" toolbar and
- checking Enable.

I believe I'd enabled it manually in 0.14.

In looking at Options -> Toolbars, I don't see "Show DnD/Away".

I see "View Groups", "Show Offline", "Show Hidden", "Show Agents",
"Show Self", and "Show Status Messages".

- These same toggles are also available in the View menu without the
- toolbar.

I'm not seeing a "View Menu".

I'm running with Qt 4.8.3 on NetBSD (UNIX.)

--
Eric Schnoebeleneric-vt2WnZFqELQ< at >public.gmane.orghttp://www.cirr.com
There has

Re: 0.15

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-07T23:57:52

Works fine here without a patch. Maybe something related to your build process?

Justin

Re: 0.15 sluggish?

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-07T23:49:52

This is the first such report I'm aware of. Any chance the two were built 
differently?

Re: missing DnD/Away button?

Justin Karneges — 2012-12-07T23:49:00

I believe this has been gone by default for awhile, though it can be 
optionally enabled. Maybe you only noticed it missing now on a fresh config. 
You can also enable the toolbuttons by going to options -> toolbars, selecting 
the "Show contacts" toolbar and checking Enable.

These same toggles are also available in the View menu without the toolbar.

Justin