<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general">
    <title>gmane.mail.nocc.general</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/655"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/654"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/653"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/652"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/651"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/650"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/649"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/648"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/647"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/645"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/644"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/643"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/642"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/641"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/640"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/639"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/638"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/637"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/636"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/655">
    <title>Re: Attachment trouble with 1.9.2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/655</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Tobias!


Just updating the release package will confusing the user! How shoud 
they know, if there "NOCC 1.9.2" is with or without the fix? (Apart from 
testing!) Saying "NOCC 1.9.2" is old, use the new "NOCC 1.9.3" is easier 
to all. There is also a other fix, which excuses a new release.

But  I have currently not many time for my projects. Work and private 
life need much attention and don't leave the time for NOCC and other 
projects from me. :(

I hopefully will find a little bit time in the next few days, but it is 
currently always a matter of luck. :)

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-30T13:33:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/654">
    <title>Re: Attachment trouble with 1.9.2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/654</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Tim,

if you can, why not just update the release package?


- Tobias.

On 28 May 2012 15:30, Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt; wrote:




&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobias Mathes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-29T16:34:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/653">
    <title>Re: Attachment trouble with 1.9.2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/653</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Thanks! :)

  bye
av.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrea Venturoli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-28T21:09:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/652">
    <title>Re: Attachment trouble with 1.9.2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/652</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi av.,

sorry for the long delay, but I have currently not so much time for 
NOCC. :-(

Your problem is a stupid typo I added to the file 
"classes\nocc_attachedfile.php":

Please change the line 122
from:
             return content;
to:
             return $content;

I fixed it already in SVN (In Revision 2552):
http://nocc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nocc?view=revision&amp;amp;revision=2552

Hopefully I will release a new version soon.

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-28T13:30:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/651">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/651</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Well, there all are sorts of nice features in IMAP, therefore it doesn't
take so long for fetching by example the amount of message inside an IMAP
folder.

I remember that I started to make some research related to problems
regarding big folders and with big I mean really big ~50k up to 100k
emails. Unfortunately I am busy with another project, otherwise I would
have another look into this problem.


- Tobias

On 24 April 2012 10:10, Thomas Orgis &amp;lt;thomas-forum&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;orgis.org&amp;gt; wrote:



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobias Mathes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T15:46:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/650">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/650</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:36:52 +0200
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


Yeah, that fixes the sorting.

But I have to check again at what stage my local copy of nocc is regarding performance ...

[Tue Apr 24 09:57:26 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: DONE opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] needed time:0.095389127731323
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:58:04 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg

Those are log entries from one request to display page 3 with 50 mails out of 871. Over half a minute of delay before the last call of num_msg, without much computing on the server side. Really have to dig around what happens during that time ... if time permits:-/

Well, you had the server opening optimized, that is not the bottleneck anymore.


Alright&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T08:10:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/649">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/649</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Thomas!

Sorry for the delay, but I have currently not many time.


What happend if change SORTARRIVAL into SORTDATE at the sort() function 
from class "nocc_imap":

Index: webmail/classes/class_local.php
===================================================================
--- webmail/classes/class_local.php(Revision 2548)
+++ webmail/classes/class_local.php(Arbeitskopie)
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -164,7 +164,7 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;
              case '1': $imapsort = SORTFROM; break;
              case '2': $imapsort = SORTTO; break;
              case '3': $imapsort = SORTSUBJECT; break;
-            case '4': $imapsort = SORTARRIVAL; break;
+            case '4': $imapsort = SORTDATE; break;
              case '5': $imapsort = SORTSIZE; break;
          }
          $sorted = imap_sort($this-&amp;gt;conn, $imapsort, $sortdir, 
SE_NOPREFETCH);

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscap&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T07:36:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/648">
    <title>Attachment trouble with 1.9.2</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/648</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello.

I've got a couple of installation on different FreeBSD servers which are 
all showing a problem since the upgrade from 1.9.1 to 1.9.2.

If an email is sent with any attachment, an attachment arrives which is 
just a few bytes long, holding only the "content" string.

Can anyone help me in diagnosing this?

  bye &amp;amp; Thanks
av.

P.S. A downgrade solved, so I'm not in a hurry, but I thought the team 
might be interested...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrea Venturoli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-23T14:08:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/647">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/647</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:58:47 +0100
schrieb Thomas Orgis &amp;lt;thomas-forum&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;orgis.org&amp;gt;: 


Just one thing... I'll have to test if this is related to latest changes, but it seems like the sorting is seriously broken. I see my mails in some order, but not along time in any coherent direction. Perhaps I can have a look at the code again, but well, I want to have it mentioned at least. It's hopefully easy to fix.


Alrighty then,

Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2_______________________________________________
Nocc-discuss mailing list
Nocc-discuss&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nocc-discuss
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T13:29:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/646">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/646</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:28:36 +0100
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


Ah, you thought of everything. I keep my mouth shut;-)


Alrighty then,

Thomas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization &amp;amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T11:58:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/645">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/645</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Huhu!


I had this doubts too, but this ports are standards. And if somebody 
really want to use 110 for IMAP and 143 for POP3 he could use the "imap" 
and "pop3" keywords to force it. Because of this, the port numbers are 
the last keywords I check. And if somebody use a total different port 
numer, the driver check will find if it is IMAP or POP3.

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization &amp;amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T11:28:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/644">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/644</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:59:06 +0100
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


Heh, once you get started, eh? ;-)


That had the server opening down to 0.09 seconds.


That brought it down to 0.07 seconds.

So, I think this function is optimized enought for now. Though, I must say that the keywords approach feels a bit dirty. The "imap" and "pop3" keywords are quite safe, I think, but hard-coding the port numbers might not be a good idea. For whatever reason, people can use any ports they want for POP / IMAP.

This bottleneck got nicely killed off now, kudos! Now on to the next one: Parsing of 25 message headers (I suppose) should not take over 3 seconds. But easy, I know how it is not to have any time for this... Thanks so far in any case!


Alrighty then,

Thomas


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization &amp;amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be del&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T10:07:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/643">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/643</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!


Ok, I speedup is_imap() once more, by using it as property and try to 
parse the server config for IMAP and POP3 keywords:

Use is_imap() from "nocc_imap" as property
http://nocc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nocc?revision=2535&amp;amp;view=revision

Accelerate isImapCheck() function from nocc_imap
http://nocc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nocc?revision=2536&amp;amp;view=revision

Hope it helps you too! :)

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization &amp;amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T07:59:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/642">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/642</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:54:16 +0100
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


Now that does make a difference!

[Wed Mar 07 23:59:29 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: opening server: bla
[Wed Mar 07 23:59:29 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: DONE opening server: bla
[Wed Mar 07 23:59:29 2012] [error] [client x] needed time:0.113281011581, bla
[Wed Mar 07 23:59:29 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: num_msg, referer: bla
[Wed Mar 07 23:59:29 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: num_msg, referer: bla
[Wed Mar 07 23:59:33 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: num_msg, referer: bla

Comparing the instant reaction on opening a single message and going to the preferences, the remaining 3 seconds seem to really correlate with work that is being done for preparing the folder view. While I still think that that be faster (parsing headers of 25 mails is not that much work), this clearly makes NOCC usable with this mailbox.

Heck, if the display of the folder view would be pushed down to about one second, NOCC would feel a lot less sluggish tha&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T23:07:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/641">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/641</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!


Sorry, I thougt it would be some log file from the mail server. So, yes 
you are right!


It would just show at the browser. If you have easy access to the web 
server logfiles error_log() is of course much sexy. :)


Maybe I just benchmark the "$pop = new nocc_imap();" call. It was late 
and was maybe sleepy. ;-)

The construtor from nocc_imap calls also his is_imap() function which 
seems to be a bottleneck. It use the imap_mailboxmsginfo() function 
which "sum up the size of all messages in the mailbox":
http://de3.php.net/imap_mailboxmsginfo

If I switch it to imap_check(), I seems to be faster!
http://nocc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nocc/trunk/webmail/classes/class_local.php?r1=2534&amp;amp;r2=2533&amp;amp;pathrev=2534

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization &amp;amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.ac&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T13:54:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/640">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/640</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:04:22 +0100
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


That's the code:

error_log("ThOr: opening server: ".$this-&amp;gt;server);
        $conn = &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;imap_open('{'.$this-&amp;gt;server.'}'.$this-&amp;gt;folder, $this-&amp;gt;login, $this-&amp;gt;passwd, 0);
error_log("ThOr: DONE opening server: ".$this-&amp;gt;server);

So that in the log...

[Tue Mar 06 17:31:28 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: opening server: bla
[Tue Mar 06 17:31:29 2012] [error] [client x] ThOr: DONE opening server: bla

Does mean that the call to imap_open didn't need more than one second, doesn't it? I might be wrong, I'm just transferring my knowledge from other programming languages.



Where would that output go? I prefer it showing up in the apache logs, hence error_log seemed fine (also as there are timestamps). 


That is interesting. Are we having two different issues here? Or am I wrong about when error_log messages get sent to apache? Trying again with that code:

error_log("ThOr: opening server: ".$this-&amp;gt;server);
$begin = microtime(true);
        $co&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T00:36:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/639">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/639</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sorry, I hit submit before I was finished! ;)

Are you sure, that "opening server" and "DONE opening server" not both 
belongs to the imap_open() call? For me it looks like, that "DONE 
opening server" starts at 17:31:29 and 17:31:57 "num_msg" can call.

A quick and dirty benchmark looks in PHP like this:

$starttime = microtime(true);
// ...
// ... do PHP stuff you will benchmark ...
// ...
// ...
$endtime = microtime(true);
var_dump($endtime - $starttime);


If you at the inbox, it not fetch the body of the mail, only the header 
infos like subject, size and more.


I echoed the time before and after the imap_open() call and it was more 
the 10 seconds.


I love the project, but I need more help to keep the project alive! :-(


Yes, the plain HTML/CSS layout, no database need and the POP3 support 
make NOCC different to the big player like RoundCube or SquirrelMail.

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnD&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T19:04:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/638">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/638</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Am 06.03.2012 17:36, schrieb Thomas Orgis:

No, but I am only honestly! My wife had big problem with the NOCC 
interface, but after I install here a Roundcube instance, she has no 
problems. And yes, I like the interface too. :-)
And they have also many developers. NOCC unfortunately not. I am 
currently the only developer and has at the moment not many time for it. 
:-((
NOCC deserve more!


Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T18:46:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/637">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/637</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Well put. That's precisely the reason for me to use NOCC.

Hanno

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Hanno Foest</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T17:12:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/636">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/636</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi again,

Am Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:46:55 +0100
schrieb Tim Gerundt &amp;lt;tim&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gerundt.de&amp;gt;: 


Fine then. Perhaps I can squeeze in a look around that function to get to the point... a quick search brings up something related:

http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/ticket/170

Seems like investigating alternatives from PEAR is one way. Though, listing the contents of the mailbox should not be that slow, especially over local link network.

http://www.phpbuilder.com/board/showthread.php?t=10124629

Hm, that seems strange.

Also; I just tested again, debug message before and after imap_open:

[Tue Mar 06 17:17:21 2012] [error] [client 141.48.166.115] ThOr: opening server: nesselzelle.de/pop3/notls:110, referer: https://webmail.nesselzelle.de/index.php
[Tue Mar 06 17:17:21 2012] [error] [client 141.48.166.115] ThOr: DONE opening server: nesselzelle.de/pop3/notls:110, referer: https://webmail.nesselzelle.de/index.php

That is not slow. I remember doing that before posting, actually... Is there some simple option to get a pro&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Orgis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T16:36:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/635">
    <title>Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.nocc.general/635</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Thomas!


Yes, imap_open() is called every time at the beginning of "action.php". 
You are true, for editing preferences we don't need it, but all other 
actions need it.


No, I have no contact to PHP developers.


In this case I would recommend Roundcube &amp;lt;http://roundcube.net/&amp;gt;. This 
open-source webmailer is so cool! ;) But unfortunately it don't support 
POP3 either.


Sorry, I just hit "Reply all".

Greetings,
Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tim Gerundt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T15:46:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.nocc.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.nocc.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
