<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap">
    <title>gmane.linux.systemtap</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20779"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20778"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20777"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20776"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20775"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20774"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20773"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20772"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20771"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20770"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20769"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20768"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20767"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20766"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20765"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20764"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20763"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20762"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20761"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20760"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20779">
    <title>[Bug documentation/15638] a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a strange manner</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20779</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

--- Comment #3 from niku &amp;lt;vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com&amp;gt; ---
Same problem with:
http://
sources.redhat.com/git/?p=systemtap.git;a=blob_plain;f=README;hb=HEAD

I think sourceware.org is the culprit; it is supposed to decode the GET string,
but it isn't doing that. If that is so, all links on the Systemtap wiki
containing special characters will fail.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T05:21:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20778">
    <title>[Bug documentation/15638] a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a strange manner</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20778</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

--- Comment #2 from niku &amp;lt;vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com&amp;gt; ---
So the error isn't bizarre, but vanilla. I hadn't noticed the Host: field.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T04:58:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20777">
    <title>Re: Systemtap do_filp_open failure on a few linux packages</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20777</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi David,

Thank you very much for going through my input and providing an 
excellent answer.
Your input nailed it for me (although with a twist; see below)

On 06/17/2013 08:16 PM, David Smith wrote:

OK, thanks, will remove it later...
Kept it for now: better safe than sorry.


My problem turned out to be environment variables indeed!
Thank you for pointing me in this direction.

However, the culprit was that LD_LIBRARY_PATH got killed.

Simply adding env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=... to the staprun solved the problem:
http://sourceforge.net/p/kaarpux/code/ci/master/tree/master/shinc/linux_functions.shinc

So, again:
THANKS A MILLION FOR THE HINT !!!

/Henrik


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Henrik /KaarPoSoft</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T20:20:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20776">
    <title>[Bug documentation/15638] a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a strange manner</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20776</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

Frank Ch. Eigler &amp;lt;fche at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fche at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Frank Ch. Eigler &amp;lt;fche at redhat dot com&amp;gt; ---
This problem was reported to the sysadmins maintaining the sources.redhat.com
http-forwarding machine.  In the mean time, we could fix the wiki to point at
http://sourceware.org/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>fche at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T19:57:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20775">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()   and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20775</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

On 06/17/2013 08:05 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:

ah ok thanks so it's currently unsupported.


Ok thanks for pointing out. If someone has a first ppc32.h file and needs
some help for testing on a native 32 bit ppc system, let me know. Or maybe
in the next week I find the time to implement one.

Best regards
Holger   

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Holger Brunck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T07:00:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20774">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()   and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20774</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Mark,

On 06/17/2013 07:43 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:

no it's not a 32 Bit program running on a 64bit machine it's  a 32 bit ppc binary crosscompiled on a 64 bit x86 architecture. The target architecture is a 32 bit ppc.

Best regards
Holger


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Holger Brunck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T06:46:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20773">
    <title>Re: [PATCH] PR11096: Add support for the "module" argument to &lt; at &gt;var</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20773</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Thanks, the patch looks very good!  I have just a few comments.

Too bad about cu_name -- perhaps that's a cleanup for another day.  I do
have a few suggestions for that though.



If these are really needed, they should go in testsuite/.gitignore.  But
generally, most of our testcases clean up after themselves.  Some tests
leave the files around in verbose mode, which is fine.



It seems inflexible to me that get_cu_scope() is trying to find just one
best-matching CU, which is the only one that will get searched for the
variable.

I think it would be better to try *all* CUs that look like a match.
This should be pretty easy by pushing the code generation into a deeper
loop through dw.iterate_over_cus.

Take a look at how tracepoint_query_cu() is used, for example.  That one
doesn't care about the actual cu_name, but that's easy enough to add for
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;var.

Consider also that we could allow &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;var("foo", "module"), having no
cu_name specified by the user, so it would iterate over them all.


This is a hint to me&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Josh Stone</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T01:06:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20772">
    <title>Re: [Patch RFC] Tolerate if nsrcs&gt;1 in iterate_over_srcfile_lines</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20772</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Frank, Do u agree or disagree with my analysis?


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jia He &amp;lt;hejianet&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jia He</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T00:31:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20771">
    <title>[Bug tapsets/11421] probe point mismatch while resolving probe point vfs.read</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20771</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11421

David Smith &amp;lt;dsmith at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |dsmith at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #5 from David Smith &amp;lt;dsmith at redhat dot com&amp;gt; ---
Since this bug has been "waiting" for over three years, and current versions of
systemtap work correctly here, I'm closing this one.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>dsmith at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T20:52:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20770">
    <title>[Bug tapsets/11414] nd_syscall.exp failures</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20770</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11414

David Smith &amp;lt;dsmith at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |dsmith at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from David Smith &amp;lt;dsmith at redhat dot com&amp;gt; ---
With bug #11424 fixed, the nd_syscall.exp testcase passes like the syscall.exp
testcase (but see bug #15219).

Here's the output I got on 3.10.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc20.x86_64:

====
Running ../../src/testsuite/systemtap.syscall/nd_syscall.exp ...
FAIL: 32-bit clock nd_syscall
FAIL: 32-bit sendfile nd_syscall
FAIL: 32-bit timer nd_syscall
FAIL: 32-bit trunc nd_syscall

        === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes        66
# of unexpected failures    4
# of unsupported tests        1
====

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>dsmith at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T20:49:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20769">
    <title>[Bug testsuite/15625] unprivileged_embedded_C test confused by stub registers.stp</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20769</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15625

Dave Brolley &amp;lt;brolley at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org    |brolley at redhat dot com

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>brolley at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T19:20:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20768">
    <title>[Bug testsuite/15625] unprivileged_embedded_C test confused by stub registers.stp</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20768</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15625

Dave Brolley &amp;lt;brolley at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |brolley at redhat dot com

--- Comment #4 from Dave Brolley &amp;lt;brolley at redhat dot com&amp;gt; ---
(In reply to Jim Keniston from comment #1)

The proper and more general solution for this is to fix embeddedc.awk so that
it does not analyse stub functions. Skipping entire files is too granular.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>brolley at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T19:19:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20767">
    <title>Follow-up to [Bug translator/14596] New: probe module enhancement request</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20767</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Colleagues, my co-worker Jim Baxter and I have been trying to get cross-compiled SystemTap scripts to work with modules on Freescale ARMv7 i.MX6.    First I compiled and ran several examples on the target board from http://sourceware.org/systemtap/examples/  just to make sure that the whole machinery was working. The compilation host is an Ubuntu VM.

My goal involves probing modules, so next I tried compiling the file probedrm.stp

      probe module("drm").function("*")
      {print("I am here\n"); exit();}

using the following script

---

STAP_SYSROOT="/build/meibp-2013/build/tmp/sysroots"
CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi-
STP_FILE=probedrm.stp
STP_BASE_NAME=$(basename ${STP_FILE} .stp)

${STAP_SYSROOT}/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/stap $1 -a arm -v -g \
                -R ${STAP_SYSROOT}/mx6q/usr/share/systemtap/runtime \
                --sysroot=${STAP_SYSROOT}/mx6q \
                -B CROSS_COMPILE=${CROSS_COMPILE} \
                -r ${STAP_SYSROOT}/mx6q/usr/src/kernel \
                ${STP_FILE} -d&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Chaiken, Alison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T18:33:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20766">
    <title>Re: Systemtap do_filp_open failure on a few linux packages</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20766</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
The script looks reasonable. One small note, you shouldn't need the
'&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;defined($return)' check since $return should always be defined in
'kernel.function("do_filp_open").return'.

...


Here's my thought. I don't think it is the probe itself that is causing
the problem, my guess would be that it is our staprun loader (a setuid
executable). When the module gets loaded, we unset several environment
variables, like 'IFS', 'CDPATH', 'ENV', 'BASH_ENV' for security reasons.

I'd guess those failing packages depend on something set in the environment.

If this is the case, to work around this problem you might be able to
modify the script you use to run staprun (linux_functions.shinc) to add
the environment variable back in. Here's that line from
linux_functions.shinc (split up a bit):

====
 staprun /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/systemtap/kx_open.ko \
  -c "./scripts/${PASS}/${PKG}_${STEP}.sh" \
  -o "${PIPE}" &amp;gt; ./log/${PASS}/${PKG}_${STEP}.log 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1
====

You could change that to

====
  staprun /lib/modules/$(uname -r&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T18:16:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20765">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()  and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20765</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Yeah thanks. I had completely forgotten I only implemented the DWARF
unwinder for ppc64. Sorry. This was because when I wrote the powerpc
DWARF unwinder (kernel support) I only had access to ppc64 kernels.

So for a ppc32 kernel we do need a new runtime/unwind/ppc32.h
definitions file. It should not be that hard to write based on the
ppc64.h version and the ppc32 DWARF register mappings from
http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/elf/elfspec_ppc.pdf
But note that testing might be needed to see if those really map to
actually used DWARF register numbers generated by the toolchain. As can
be seen in the comments in ppc64.h sometimes mistakes have been made and
theory/spec and practice are not the same :{

Cheers,

Mark



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Wielaard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T18:05:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20764">
    <title>[Bug runtime/10272] backtraces fail with 32-on-64 executables</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20764</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10272

Lukas Berk &amp;lt;lberk at redhat dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lberk at redhat dot com
           Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org    |lberk at redhat dot com

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>lberk at redhat dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T18:02:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20763">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()  and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20763</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey,


Unfortunately I believe this is because we don't actually support
powerpc32 (only ppc64.h is defined in unwind.h).  So while the first
error you're getting is being worked on (I'm currently working on
PR10272[1] so hopefully it'll be resloved soon), the second error will
be the show stopper here.  

Thanks,

Lukas

[1] - http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10272
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Lukas Berk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T18:00:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20762">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()  and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20762</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
It looks like ppc64 is supported, at least according to
runtime/linux/runtime.h. If 'powerpc64' is defined,
STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER gets defined.

Does getting a backtrace for a simple 64-bit program work?

I've CC'ed Mark Wielaard, who might know off the top of his head what
the status of getting a 32-bit backtrace on ppc64 is.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T17:46:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20761">
    <title>Re: print_ubacktrace()  and ppc 32</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20761</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Yes, if your powerpc kernel is 64bit, but the user program is 32bit
(same for 32bit user space on x86_64) then you will get that warning
during stap translation time (the stap script should still run, but
won't produce a user backtrace for the 32bit module/library/process).
This is bug: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10272
"backtraces fail with 32-on-64 executables"


This might be caused by the cross compiling, maybe something got
confused about the architecture. You get that when:
#ifndef STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER
powerpc (and x86_64) both should use the DWARF_UNWINDER. So you might
want to look at why that doesn't get defined in your case.

Cheers,

Mark


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Wielaard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T17:43:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20760">
    <title>[Bug documentation/15638] a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a strange manner</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20760</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

niku &amp;lt;vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com&amp;gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |minor

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T16:55:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20759">
    <title>[Bug documentation/15638] New: a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a strange manner</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.systemtap/20759</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638

            Bug ID: 15638
           Summary: a link on sourceware.org/systemtap site behaving in a
                    strange manner
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: documentation
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com

Created attachment 7080
  --&amp;gt; http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7080&amp;amp;action=edit
log of 3 three streams

The given link† on the webpage is behaving in a bizarre manner. Check
the TCP streams 1 and 3 in the attached page. The request is
_identical_, but the HTTP server responds in two different _reproducible_
ways: once resulting in a 404 error, and once serving the correct page. 

†http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=systemtap.git;a=blob_plain;f=INTERNALS;hb=HEAD

To reproduce: 
(i) Go to http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/Sys&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>vaibhav.niku at yandex dot com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T16:51:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.systemtap">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.systemtap</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
