http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16180 <pre> These tests are failing on following setup: # numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 free: 0 MB node 1 cpus: node 1 size: 12288 MB node 1 free: 9998 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 Avoid hardcoded node 0 by using numa_get_mems_allowed(). Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek &lt;jstancek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; --- .../syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c | 7 ++++--- testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. htt</pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-23T11:02:57 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16179 <pre>Hi! That is really good news. It kind of clashes with what Marios is doing during GSOC, but I guess that there is enough room for both of you and Marios will be, for a next couple of weeks, still working on cleaning up the lib/*. Hmm, I would start by fixing what is broken. We do have some testcases that are very poorly implemented and even aren't executed in default run (diff of runtest files and list of created binaries may help). For example sig{timed}wait{info} testcases seems to be confused if they are testing syscall or libcall (you can't get ENOSYS in case of libcall as the arguments are dereferenced in userspace before passed to the kernel). And the way several tests are created from one source depending on -Dxxx passed on commandline is really confusing... Also it may be better for you to fork the LTP repo on github for your own development and pull changes to the main repo once you are sure it's clean enough and working. </pre> Cyril Hrubis 2012-05-23T10:13:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16178 <pre>于 2012/4/17 10:38, Caspar Zhang 写道: Now I've gotten the account on lkml and create a project by my own. So now we can begin the merge work. If you have any suggestion, just let me know. The new project is under git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/mce-test.git http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/mce-test.git https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/mce-test.git The current status is ready to be merged. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list </pre> Chen Gong 2012-05-23T01:52:53 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16177 <pre> Based on proposed man page: http://ozlabs.org/~cyeoh/cma/process_vm_readv.txt Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek &lt;jstancek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; --- runtest/syscalls | 3 + testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/cma01.c | 421 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_readv/Makefile | 7 + .../kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_writev/Makefile | 7 + 4 files changed, 438 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/cma01.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list-5NWGOfrQmneR</pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-22T14:17:54 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16176 <pre> add directory structure for tests related to syscalls: process_vm_readv process_vm_writev Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek &lt;jstancek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/Makefile | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_readv/Makefile | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_writev/Makefile | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/Makefile create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_readv/Makefile create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm_writev/Makefile ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http:/</pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-22T14:17:50 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16175 <pre> header file shared by tests, defines: test_process_vm_readv test_process_vm_writev Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek &lt;jstancek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma/process_vm.h ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list </pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-22T14:17:52 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16174 <pre>changes in v2 - dropped configure check as glibc wrapper calls syscall directly, and using syscall(2) we can test also when glibc wrappers are missing - added simplified process_vm.h CMA (cross memory attach) feature introduced 2 new syscalls: process_vm_readv process_vm_writev commit fcf634098c00dd9cd247447368495f0b79be12d1 Author: Christopher Yeoh &lt;cyeoh-8fk3Idey6ehBDgjK7y7TUQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Date: Mon Oct 31 17:06:39 2011 -0700 Cross Memory Attach "The basic idea behind cross memory attach is to allow MPI programs doing intra-node communication to do a single copy of the message rather than a double copy of the message via shared memory." [1] This patch series is introducing the initial structure under syscalls/cma and first test to check various errno codes as described in proposed man page [2]. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/451188/ [2] http://ozlabs.org/~cyeoh/cma/process_vm_readv.txt Jan Stancek (3): add testcases/kernel/syscalls/cma cma: add process_vm.h syscalls/cma: add errno tests r</pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-22T14:17:22 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16173 <pre> In order to get LTP more up to date and expand breadth of syscall requirements testing, I'm going to be working on adding more syscall tests to LTP over the next couple weeks. I started out with inotify(7), but I want to move on to newer syscalls that exercise MI (machine independent) functionality, while at the same time do not want to duplicate work being done by others elsewhere. The long and short of it is that I want to update Linux compat in FreeBSD (or at least provide the tests to do that) and in order to achieve that, I need up-to-date testcases that pass on an older version of Fedora running 2.6 (say Fedora 10) and Fedora 17 (runs 3.3). The current testcases are ok, but not exhaustive in all areas and that's what I'm aiming to improve. Thoughts on this and also an idea of where we need to add more exhaustive testcases (otherwise I'll have to work through the list and pore over manpages looking for my next "target" :)..)? Thanks! -Garrett ------------------------------------------------</pre> Garrett Cooper 2012-05-21T17:19:23 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16172 <pre> OK, pushed with your Acks. Thanks all involved. Wanlong Gao ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Wanlong Gao 2012-05-21T09:16:57 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16171 <pre> Yeah.. -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Garrett Cooper 2012-05-21T09:06:55 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16170 <pre> You mean the commit log? Thanks, Wanlong Gao ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Wanlong Gao 2012-05-21T09:01:49 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16169 <pre> yes, you are right, as I said, the program itself already checked the kernel version, check the kernel version at Makefile is conceptual wrong. Thanks, Wanlong Gao ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Wanlong Gao 2012-05-21T08:58:44 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16168 <pre> I don't agree with this statement. LTP needs to be usable on 2.6.x for at least 2 years after 3.x's inception. Agreed. I think that this check was incorrectly implemented. Furthermore, this causes confusion when the test case doesn't exist; it's better to stub out the test case in the source. I would just remove the first line -- the rest of the info is valid. Cheers! -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Garrett Cooper 2012-05-21T08:55:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16167 <pre> The fix makes sense, however, "checking for 2.6.x" is still valid for old kernels (does LTP still support 2.4.x? I'm not sure...) Anyway, Acked-by: Caspar Zhang &lt;caspar-KOJSycSPlG5FxwKWlkMNEg&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Caspar Zhang 2012-05-21T08:50:22 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16166 <pre>Now, kernel version up to 3.x, check for 2.6.x is useless. Additionally, we already checked the kernel version in the program itself. Meanwhile, check the kernel version at compiling time is wrong, we may not do testing on the same machine as compiling. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao &lt;gaowanlong-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/Makefile | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/Makefile index b8bf68b..7a1a87a 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/Makefile +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/Makefile &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -19,18 +19,4 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; top_srcdir?= ../../../.. include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk - -ifneq ($(shell uname -r | grep -c "^2\.6\.*"), 1) - -MAKE_TARGETS:= - -.PHONY: no-all-install - -all install: no-all-install - -no-all-install: -&lt; at &gt;echo "Warning: Kernel doesn't support this test case" - -endif - include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_</pre> Wanlong Gao 2012-05-21T08:38:36 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16165 <pre> It's in the diff in my local tree. Basically: diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls index 679ff5b..e203d5e 100644 --- a/runtest/syscalls +++ b/runtest/syscalls &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -439,6 +439,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; inotify_init1_02 inotify_init1_02 inotify01 inotify01 inotify02 inotify02 inotify03 inotify03 -D DEVICE -T DEVICE_FS_TYPE +inotify04 inotify04 ioperm01 ioperm01 ioperm02 ioperm02 I'll yank the other references. I need to know if the inotify.h cleanup is ok before committing this. Thanks! -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Garrett Cooper 2012-05-19T00:23:51 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16164 <pre> Yeah, I pulled that diff. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Garrett Cooper 2012-05-19T00:24:25 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16163 <pre>Hi! Looks good, but runtest entry is missing. And (as I said in different mail allready) I would remove the NAME and HISTORY from the comment above. </pre> Cyril Hrubis 2012-05-18T12:59:29 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16161 <pre>On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:56:17 -0400 (EDT) Jan Stancek &lt;jstancek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: Thanks for the feedback. I'll have a go at reworking them. that would be fine with me. I agree - the configure check is much better. I was just trying to get something working :-) Regards, Chris </pre> Christopher Yeoh 2012-05-18T08:35:34 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16160 <pre> I'm attaching sample process_vm.h for illustration. This would go on top of: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16053 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16054 each test would include that, check ltp_process_vm_readv/writev for NULL and optionally end with TCONF or continue. Regards, Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list </pre> Jan Stancek 2012-05-17T14:26:51 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16159 <pre>Hi! Commited, thanks everyone involved ;). </pre> Cyril Hrubis 2012-05-17T11:05:42 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.ltp