gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.sugar

Re: [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn — 2013-05-19T21:03:10

Hi,
I'm not have a slow computer (I think) but never can finish the compile of webkit.Once time takes 3 hours and continues compiling: 3 hours with my 2 cores at 95 ~ 100% of use!!I'm tire of that and do "ctrl+c", go to system.json, add a rule: if distro != ubuntu13.10..In my case of use never use webkit (but maybe someone wants to use).
If instead compile it, we install as a dependency?Or the installed version is old?
Regards!
Alan
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:41:16 +0200
From: dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com
To: sugar-devel< at >lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

Hey,

It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about a couple of possible solutions:

1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system dependencies which most people are unlikely to want to modify anyway and upload those. It would probably be a system.img file which you would put in your sugar-build director

Re: Getting karma to work with sugar-activity-html

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T20:03:42


Just realized that sugar-launch is probably supposed to be always launched
inside a sugar-terminal, inside the shell, so the environment should be
fine there. With sugar-runner --test-command, the command is launched
outside the shell instead, which breaks things.

Perhaps we should just add a --run-test argument to the sugar script and
use that in sugar-runner. With such argument the shell would run the
command asynchronously, watch its exit status and return it.
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel< at >lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Getting karma to work with sugar-activity-html

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T19:42:07

Hello,

I think the easiest approach is probably to

1 Install an empty html activity, say sugar-html-test module, bundle_id
org.sugarlabs.HTMLTestActivity.

2 Make sugar-activity-html support the --uri option. This is what I have
right now

-        self._web_view.load_uri("activity://%s/index.html" %
self._bundle_id)
+        if handle.uri:
+            self._web_view.load_uri(handle.uri)
+        else:
+            self._web_view.load_uri("activity://%s/index.html" %
+                                    self._bundle_id)

3 Fix sugar-launch to handle the --uri argument

4 Somehow fix sugar-launch to work properly with html activities. The
websocket communication is not working right because it requires the
key/port variables which are in the shell environment and sugar-launch is
not running in there.

5 Run with something like

sugar-runner --test-command "sugar-launch org.sugarlabs.HTMLTestActivity
--uri $url_to_karma_server"

Probably wrapped in a friendlier script.

I put together something like this in

Re: Unit tests in Sugar HTML

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T17:43:56

Figured out. I had first tried to install it from git, but without running
the grunt file. Then I installed from npm, but the git built was stuck in
the cache... Confusing!


On 19 May 2013 18:31, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Unit tests in Sugar HTML

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T16:31:24

Can't quite get karma to work

INFO [karma]: Karma server started at http://localhost:9876/
WARN [watcher]: Pattern
"/home/dnarvaez/Development/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/node_modules/karma/adapter/jasmine.js"
does not match any file.
WARN [watcher]: Pattern
"/home/dnarvaez/Development/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/node_modules/karma/adapter/require.js"
does not match any file.
WARN [web server]: 404:
/home/dnarvaez/Development/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/node_modules/karma/static/testacular.js
WARN [web server]: 404:
/home/dnarvaez/Development/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/node_modules/karma/static/testacular.js

Looks like testacular.js and jasmine are not installed. Tried both 0.8.5 in
git and from npm.



On 13 May 2013 16:22, Manuel Quiñones <manuq< at >laptop.org> wrote:

Re: [PATCH sugar-terminal] Use json instead ofsimplejson

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T15:59:40

Thanks Daniel, buildbot is happy now.


On 19 May 2013 01:41, Daniel Francis <francis< at >sugarlabs.org> wrote:

Re: Remove sugar-html-core from guthub

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T15:57:06

Looks like the move had failed, probably because I already had a fork. Now
gone for real.


On 19 May 2013 16:50, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T15:56:37

All modules added to the new Contributors group.


On 19 May 2013 16:48, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Remove sugar-html-core from guthub

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T14:50:39

I thought I add moved it to my personal GitHub (didn't dare directly
killing it) but I have just seen it in the admin interface too. I will
check when GitHub goes back working here.

On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:

Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T14:48:48

I added you to the contributors group which is pull only. Does that give
you what you need?

I'm not sure if I added any module to the group, I was editing and GitHub
stopped working on my crappy connection. I will add them when it's back
anyway.

On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:

Remove sugar-html-core from guthub

Aneesh Dogra — 2013-05-19T14:28:34

As the sugar-html-core is now splited into sugar-html-activity and
sugar-html-bus, its no point keeping it after the split.

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Aneesh Dogra — 2013-05-19T14:23:42

I noticed that sugarlabs was removed from my listed organizations on
github. Is it possible to add me as a member too? If its not too much to
ask!


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

Walter Bender — 2013-05-19T11:49:36

I'd go for options 2 and 3 (just adding a comment in the build process
warning people that building webkigtk take a *long* time. So those who
want to build it themselves will know to be patient.

-walter

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

[sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T11:41:16

Hey,

It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I
would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about
a couple of possible solutions:

1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system dependencies which
most people are unlikely to want to modify anyway and upload those. It
would probably be a system.img file which you would put in your sugar-build
directory. With that file present, the external sugar dependencies would
not be downloaded and built at all.

2 Officially support Fedora 19, disable the webkitgtk build there and
suggest people for which building webkigtk is too much to use Fedora19.

Thoughts? Would you use 1/2 if it was available?

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T10:43:19

 I tested it now. There was a couple of leftovers in sugar-html-activity
and sugar-html-template. I pushed fixes for these. I went without a review
for the sake of avoiding regressions. If anyone has comments I'm happy to
fix them now, but they was really simple changes.

https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-html-template/commit/0cbfd247a99a58ad53caf2fe67576781a89abe00
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-html-activity/commit/fef4b7e8e42019ffc28f4463d8a047ddb4e0c69a


On 19 May 2013 11:05, Aneesh Dogra <lionaneesh< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Question when creating an html activity from template

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T10:36:34

lib/sugar-html-graphics>/karma.conf.js

It's sort of annoying/confusing. I guess we need to make volo ignore the
karma files somehow.

Re: Webkit drag and drop bug

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T09:46:23

I think we are not actually hitting the issue anymore with get_uris(), but
anyway, a patch is landing upstream to fix the get_data case too.


On 4 April 2013 23:54, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T09:44:35

All pushed, thanks! I haven't tested yet either tbh, I have a build in
progress too. Will test when that's done.


On 19 May 2013 11:05, Aneesh Dogra <lionaneesh< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Aneesh Dogra — 2013-05-19T09:05:07

I am done! I guess! I haven't yet tested the html activity yet, because I
have a crappy net connection and sugar-build is taking centuries to
download everything. But if you can do the tests. Then I guess I am done!


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T08:48:05

Let me know when you are done so I can go ahead with the rest of your
patches.


On 19 May 2013 10:38, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Could someone please add me to the Sugarlabs organization on github.

Daniel Narvaez — 2013-05-19T08:38:52

Temporarily made you an owner :) You should be able to go ahead.

On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote: