gmane.linux.debian.devel.release

Bug#709663: transition: gjs

Michael Biebl — 2013-05-24T21:17:50

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org< at >packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

as part of the big GNOME 3.8 transition I'd like start with a small one:
gjs.
Even though the soname has not changed, there were some incompatible
changes, so we renamed the library package name (again).
The new upstream version 1.32 has been successfully everywhere
(via experimental).
I've built the 4 rdeps:
libpeas, gnome-shell and cinnamon can be binNMUed against the new
version. 
gnome-sushi needs a small patch and therefore a sourceful upload.

Given the tiny size of this transition, it would be great to start this
transition as soon as possible as other bits are blocked on this.

Thanks,
Michael
(on behalf of the Debian GNOME team)

Ben file:

title = "gjs";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgjs0b" | .depends ~ "libgjs0c";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgjs0c";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgjs0b";

Bug#709634: [DRE-maint] Bug#709634: RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7, ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5, ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4

Gunnar Wolf — 2013-05-24T20:35:15

This one could also be removed. Rails 3 includes its own translation
framework, and sadly, Gettext works quite unreliably for it. Even for
the late 2.3.x versions, I have some very strange intermittent L10N
problems.

Processed: Re: Bug#709634: RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7, ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5, ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2013-05-24T18:30:09

Processing control commands:

Bug #709634 [release.debian.org] RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7, ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5, ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

Bug#709629: marked as done (nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2013-05-24T18:30:13

Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2013 19:22:19 +0100
with message-id <1369419739.18864.6.camel< at >jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709629: nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #709629,
regarding nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

Bug#709634: RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7, ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5, ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4

Adam D. Barratt — 2013-05-24T18:20:44

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 17:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:

We can't right now:

$ dak rm -Rn -s testing ruby-active{support,record,resource}-2.3
ruby-rails-2.3 ruby-action{pack,mailer}-2.3
[...]
# Broken Depends:
rails: rails
       ruby-actionmailer
       ruby-actionpack
       ruby-activerecord
       ruby-activeresource
       ruby-activesupport
ruby-activeldap: ruby-activeldap

Regards,

Adam

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T17:02:07

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#709634: RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7, ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5, ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4

Ondřej Surý — 2013-05-24T15:38:20

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org< at >packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi,

please kill rails 2.3 from testing.  It has been replaced by rails 3.2

(And hopefully by rails 4.0 before jessie is out, so we don't end up
with having two version of RubyGemHell(TM) next time).

I will ask for RM, but it will need some checking with our r-deps:

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
puppet: puppet-testsuite
ruby-feedtools[1]: ruby-feedtools
ruby-gettext-activerecord[1]: ruby-gettext-activerecord
ruby-gettext-rails[1]: ruby-gettext-rails
ruby-recaptcha: ruby-recaptcha
ruby-roxml[1]: ruby-roxml

# Broken Build-Depends:
ruby-bson[1]: ruby-activesupport
ruby-escape-utils[1]: ruby-actionpack
ruby-fast-gettext[1]: ruby-activerecord
ruby-haml-magic-translations[1]: ruby-actionpack
ruby-i18n[1]: ruby-activesupport
ruby-roxml[1]: ruby-activerecord
               ruby-activesupport
ruby-timecop[1]: ruby-activesupport
ruby-treetop[1]: ruby-activesupport

1. Will be handled interna

Bug#709629: nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3

Luca Falavigna — 2013-05-24T14:55:34

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org< at >packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu


Please schedule binNMUs for libavg to drop python2.6 dependencies.

#701304 shouldn't be a problem anymore, I was able to reproduce the
build failure some days ago, but it seems the cause of the problem has
been somehow fixed (it was related to boost1.53, IIRC), as I'm
currently able to rebuild libavg now.

nmu libavg_1.7.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Drop python2.6'

Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

Adam D. Barratt — 2013-05-24T14:48:18

[Recipients fixed up to use the bug, rather than the list]

On 2013-05-24 14:44, Stéphane Glondu wrote:

Okay; I've added a removal hint. Barring any new issues, that should 
let the packages migrate in the next run.

Regards,

Adam

Re: Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

Stéphane Glondu — 2013-05-24T13:44:04

Le 24/05/2013 15:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :

Removing, because of #707585, as said in [1]. With Mehdi's approval (he
is why's maintainer).

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions


Cheers,

Bug#709619: release.debian.org: [tools] migration.pl could show details of attempted hints

Adam D. Barratt — 2013-05-24T13:18:21

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian.org< at >packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools

In addition to displaying the result of attempting to migrate a 
particular package on its own, it would be helpful if migration.pl could 
display the results of any hints (manual or automagic) involving the 
package.

Adam

Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

Adam D. Barratt — 2013-05-24T13:15:34

Really?


britney's already trying without any manual input (she's generally 
quite good at it):

leading: 
camlp5,ledit/kfreebsd-i386,hol-light/mipsel,aac-tactics,ledit/kfreebsd-amd64,ledit/powerpc,hol-light/amd64,ledit/mipsel,ledit/sparc,ulex0.8/kfreebsd-i386,ulex0.8/ia64,ledit/armhf,hol-light/kfreebsd-amd64,hol-light/ia64,ssreflect,ulex0.8/i386,hol-light/i386,hol-light/kfreebsd-i386,coq,ledit/i386,ulex0.8/mipsel,ledit/amd64,ledit/ia64,hol-light/s390x,hol-light/s390,ledit/s390x,ulex0.8/s390x,ulex0.8/sparc,ledit/mips,ulex0.8/armhf,ulex0.8/s390,ulex0.8/powerpc,hol-light/sparc,ledit/s390,ulex0.8/armel,ulex0.8/amd64,hol-light/armhf,hol-light/armel,ulex0.8/mips,hol-light/powerpc,ulex0.8/kfreebsd-amd64,hol-light/mips,ledit/armel,coq-float
start: 15+0: i-2:a-0:a-0:a-1:i-0:k-3:k-3:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1:s-3:s-2
orig: 15+0: i-2:a-0:a-0:a-1:i-0:k-3:k-3:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1:s-3:s-2
easy: 17+0: i-4:a-0:a-0:a-1:i-0:k-3:k-3:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1:s-3:s-2
     * i386: libwhy-coq, why-examples

Looking at the dependencies, I guess why need

Processed: block 704032 with 701336 708802

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2013-05-24T13:15:17

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org:

Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 704045 709248 709576 709254 701243 709575 709574 709577 709570 704044 709578 706648 709579 709251 701288
704032 was blocking: 695826 707376 708109 708439 708443 708445 708446 708448
Added blocking bug(s) of 704032: 708802 and 701336
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

Stéphane Glondu — 2013-05-24T13:03:45

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important

Dear Release Managers,

Now that glib has migrated, I think that camlp5 [1] and related
packages need manual hinting. All the packages listed in the "Coq"
section of [2] need to enter together.

[1] http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=camlp5
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions

By the way, could I acquire easy-hinting capabilities so that I could
directly handle OCaml packages in the same way as I do for binNMUs? I
promise not to mess with other packages :-)


Cheers,

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T11:02:47

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT

Re: Bug#666825: Apache 2.4 upload date scheduled for May 30

Julien Cristau — 2013-05-24T10:13:11

That lot is in now.

Cheers,
Julien

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T09:47:07

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T09:32:08

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#697751: pu: package gdm3/2.30.5-6squeeze5

Josselin Mouette — 2013-05-24T09:06:14

Le samedi 11 mai 2013 à 18:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : 

Sorry for the delay. I just uploaded it to oldstable.

Cheers,

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T07:52:54

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Debian FTP Masters — 2013-05-24T07:17:06

Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT