<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general">
    <title>gmane.linux.debian.devel.general</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131547"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131546"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131543"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131541"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131539"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131538"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131537"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131536"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131535"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131534"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131533"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131532"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131531"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131530"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131529"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131527"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131526"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131524"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131523"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131522"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131547">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131547</link>
    <description>29.08.2008 в 19:51:13 +0200 Frank Küster написал:

Looks similar to #479709, which happens with linux 2.6.25/2.6.26 but not
2.6.24 and seems to be provoked by chrony.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Stepan Golosunov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-30T11:08:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131546">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131546</link>
    <description>Hi,

Am 29.08.2008 um 20:20 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:


Mine too.



Can I download an iso image of a boot CD with memtest86+ somewhere? I  
have only this single Linux machine at the moment, and there's no  
chance at all that the machine works long enough that I am able to  
install the package and understand how to create an image.


That's exactly what I did and why I am reporting this as a Debian  
bug: It never occurred when booting from a Knoppix CD, even after hours.

The only thing that is different hardware-wise is that the harddisk  
is mostly inactive in Knoppix.

Is there any live system available which can handle lvm volumes? I  
think I even have some free disk space for an additional partition to  
install the live system on harddisk. But I cannot access it from  
Knoppix, and didn't find information on lvm in the Knoppix FAQ.

TIA, Frank


</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Küster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-30T10:21:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131543">
    <title>Debian on Zaurus ?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131543</link>
    <description>Dear developers,

with great interest I read your message of running debian on freerunner.

According to this, I asked myself, if there might be an easy way to install 
debian on a Sharp Zaurus SL-C1000. I googled, but I only found some homebrew 
images and ways of install with very oold kernels (or japanese environments 
and so on).

I hope, that the knowledge of "installing debian on freerunner" might be 
easyly transferred to be able to install debian on the Zaurus machine. The 
Zaurus got a strong-arm cpu, as well as the freerunner.

Maybe it might be much more easy to build a kernel and the required content on 
the sd-card ? The main problem, IMO is to create the kernel. It must be in 
the flashable format (at the moment I am using angstrom-distribution). If a 
kernel can be flashed, you need the rest of the content (the "initrd") which 
must be put onto the sd-card. A file in tgz-style should do it (can be 
unpacked onto the sd-card using a cardreader).

Are there efforts at the moment to get debian in</description>
    <dc:creator>Hans-J. Ullrich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-30T09:32:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131541">
    <title>Please, stop this hurting vendetta, don't you think enough time has passed ?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131541</link>
    <description>Hello, ...

This is the first time in the over-a-year that i have been banned from the
debian mailing lists that i try to go around the ban to post an appeal to
the whole debian community. And i am sorry to come again with this.

I write this, because even despite what debian has done to me,  i still
follow the debian lists, i still counsel people to use debian, i still try
to help as i can, and i still believe that the debian project, and the
majority of DDs and associated are nice and friendly people believing in a
noble cause.

I write this, because even after a year and more after having been expulsed
and reduced to silence like i was, my heart is still bleeding and my soul
hurting each time i am again and again repeatedly hurt and humiliated, and i
don't understand how it is possible that some people in debia still have the
need to come after me like they do over a year after the facts.

I don't understand how people which i once considered friends and respected
could be so devoid of compasion and heart</description>
    <dc:creator>Sven Luther</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-30T00:03:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131539">
    <title>Bug#497104: ITP: libpdfrenderer-java -- Java PDF renderer and viewer</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131539</link>
    <description>Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner &lt;twerner&lt; at &gt;debian.org&gt;

* Package name    : libpdfrenderer-java
  Version         : 0~20080829
  Upstream Author : joshy, rbair, tomoke
* URL             : https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net
* License         : LGPL
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description     : Java PDF renderer and viewer
 The PDF Renderer is just what the name implies: an open source, all
 Java library which renders PDF documents to the screen using Java2D.
 Typically this means drawing into a Swing panel, but it could also draw
 to other Graphics2D implementations. It could be used to draw on top of
 PDFs, share them over a network, convert PDFs to PNG images, or maybe
 even project PDFs into a 3D scene.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Torsten Werner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T21:46:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131538">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131538</link>
    <description>

I had something similar a few months ago, and it was related to the
kernel's clocksource setting.
But that was with 2.6.21 and 2.6.22, so probably doesn't apply here.

Cheers,
gregor
</description>
    <dc:creator>gregor herrmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T21:51:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131537">
    <title>Re: automatic bug filing by test robot</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131537</link>
    <description>
Why, the same way all the manual duplicate bug filers[1] check :-)

Steve

[1] yes, I've filed a few duplicates in my life, no need to point them
out.


</description>
    <dc:creator>Steve Greenland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T21:38:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131536">
    <title>Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131536</link>
    <description>
Well here's what you do as I have just made the transition myself.
First you notice that both grub and grub2 are available. Further
research shows that grub has ceased development, which has moved to
grub2. The problem with grub2 is that it is hardly documented compared
to grub, and one cannot rely on the old grub manual as grub and grub2
are apparently quite different. So, one uses trial and error. Yes,
sounds risky in that you might make your computer unbootable, but
that's what I did. Apparently one uses update-grub &amp;&amp;
grub-install /dev/hd[a, etc.]

I also reported /etc/kernel-img.conf being documented in a different
package, but in the end I find I can't trust it anyway, and in my
shutdown script I have

test "$(find /boot -type f -cnewer /boot/grub/core.img)" &amp;&amp;
  update-grub &amp;&amp; grub-install /dev/hda

Maybe I'm being overcautious now that I'm using grub instead of lilo,
but: with some older users, being locked out of their computer might
be the straw that breaks the camels' back. They can't access the
</description>
    <dc:creator>jidanni&lt; at &gt;jidanni.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T20:50:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131535">
    <title>Bug#497090: ITP: libghc6-terminfo-dev -- Haskell bindings to the terminfo library</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131535</link>
    <description>Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva" &lt;marcot&lt; at &gt;riseup.net&gt;

* Package name    : libghc6-terminfo-dev
  Version         : 0.2
  Upstream Author : Judah Jacobson &lt;judah.jacobson&lt; at &gt;gmail.com&gt;
* URL             : http://code.haskell.org/terminfo
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: Haskell
  Description     : Haskell bindings to the terminfo library

This library provides an interface to the terminfo database (via bindings to the curses library). Terminfo allows programs to interact with a variety of terminals using a standard set of capabilities.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T20:19:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131534">
    <title>Re: Section of the sendmail manual page</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131534</link>
    <description>Lars,

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:50:23PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:

Of course it isn’t…


Yup, that’s about my stream of thought as well.


No, it isn’t much of a problem, it’s just a little inconsistency I came
across recently.  Working on a sendmail wrapper, I noted that setting up
a diversion on /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz and installing a
replacement was not enough to hide the original sendmail’s manpage in
all cases.  So I have a choice between using two diversions or changing
some packages.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Schutte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T19:16:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131533">
    <title>Bug#497082: ITP: libev-perl -- perl interface to libev, a high performance full-featured event loop</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131533</link>
    <description>Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Maximilian Gaß" &lt;mxey&lt; at &gt;cloudconnected.org&gt;

* Package name    : libev-perl
  Version         : 3.43
  Upstream Author : Marc Lehmann &lt;schmorp&lt; at &gt;schmorp.de&gt;
* URL             : http://search.cpan.org/dist/EV/
* License         : Artistic | GPL-1+
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description     : perl interface to libev, a high performance full-featured event loop

This module is very fast and scalable. It is actually so fast that you
can use it through the AnyEvent module, stay portable to other event
loops (if you don't rely on any watcher types not available through it)
and still be faster than with any other event loop currently supported in
Perl.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Maximilian Gaß</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T19:05:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131532">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131532</link>
    <description>Hello,

Am Freitag, den 29.08.2008, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Frank Küster:


I noticed something similiar, with the VMware Workstation 6.5 Beta
I thought this was just a bug in the beta but maybe it's somewhere in
Debian.

For example sometimes I just rsync a whole system to another one.
and then it seems to hang like you experience it.
But if I then just hide the window and unhide it again, then it get's
updated once.
I had to do it a few times to check if rsync was finished or not.
So the system was still running it was just the graphic output in my
case which wasn't updated.


Hm unfortunately I don't know if in my case the network still worked or
not.
If it happens again for me I try to find more about it.

On my native real Debian sid/experimental system I hadn't this problem
yet.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Felix Zielcke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T18:42:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131531">
    <title>Re: Section of the sendmail manual page</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131531</link>
    <description>pe, 2008-08-29 kello 20:42 +0200, Michael Schutte kirjoitti:

I don't think a missing manual page is a serious bug.


/usr/sbin/sendmail is, most importantly, a command line API for sending
e-mail, which user agents and other software can and do use. For this
role, I think section 1 is most appropriate, and section 8 is also fine.

/usr/sbin/sendmail can also be a daemon that provides a mail transport
agent. For this role, section 8 seems like the only choice.

Thus, I think the right section is dependent on how the package uses
the /usr/sbin/sendmail it provides, but if you insist on the same
section being used everywhere, then it's 8. 

I do not see it as a problem for different packages to provide the
manual page in different sections. But I may be missing something, and
if so, please elaborate.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Lars Wirzenius</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T18:50:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131530">
    <title>Section of the sendmail manual page</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131530</link>
    <description>Hi everyone,

Of the 13 packages in sid providing mail-transport-agent, four come with
a sendmail(1) manual page, while the remaining eight ship with
sendmail(8) (citadel-mta has neither of them; I’m going to open a
serious bug after receiving some replies to this mail).  I could barely
care less under most circumstances, but it does make maintainer scripts
for sendmail wrappers longer by two dpkg-divert lines.

Which section of the manual do you think sendmail belongs in?  I don’t
have a strong opinion on this; it can act as a daemon process as well as
an ordinary program started by an MUA.  I’d personally go with
sendmail(8) to file fewer bugs (it’s the traditional choice, too).

Cheers,
</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Schutte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T18:42:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131529">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131529</link>
    <description>pe, 2008-08-29 kello 19:51 +0200, Frank Küster kirjoitti:

My first suspicion would be about the hardware. You could run memtest86+
for at least 12 hours or until the first error.

Another idea: you could test the system with another version of Debian,
or with Ubuntu, Knoppix, or another live CD, and see if you can
reproduce the problem with that.





</description>
    <dc:creator>Lars Wirzenius</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T18:20:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131527">
    <title>Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131527</link>
    <description>Hi,

Am 28.08.2008 um 22:41 schrieb Frank Küster:


I should have been more specific here. It's not only the input, it's  
the output as well. For example, if aptitude is downloading packages  
in an rxvt window, the percent count stops changing as well, the  
display is also frozen.

Any (ethernet) network also seems to stop: It no longer answers to  
pings, and a remote ssh login stops working, too.

Any ideas how I can start debugging this?

Regards, Frank




</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Küster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T17:51:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131526">
    <title>Re: Bug#497056: lsb-base:  /lib/lsb/init-functions NON-DSFGLicence ?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131526</link>
    <description>pe, 2008-08-29 kello 11:20 -0500, William Pitcock kirjoitti:

Since I agree with William, I'm closing the bug. If Jari disagrees,
he'll let us know.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Lars Wirzenius</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T16:56:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131524">
    <title>Re: Bug#497056: lsb-base:  /lib/lsb/init-functions NON-DSFGLicence ?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131524</link>
    <description>pe, 2008-08-29 kello 18:30 +0300, root kirjoitti:

In what way do you think the lsb-base license does not conform to the
DFSG?


Derived works and distribution of them are allowed, as far as I can see.


This does not seem to be a problem, either.

I am missing something.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Lars Wirzenius</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T15:40:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131523">
    <title>Bug#497056: lsb-base:  /lib/lsb/init-functions NON-DSFG Licence ?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131523</link>
    <description>Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-19
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1


Please investigate if files included in lsb-base conform to DFSG. A lincense
change to GPL would be better suited for Debian.

Policy / 2.1. The Debian Free Software Guidelines:

     ...
     Derived Works
          The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must
          allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license
          of the original software.

     Integrity of The Author's Source Code
          The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in
          modified form _only_ if the license allows the distribution of
          "patch files" with the source code for the purpose of modifying
          the program at build time.  The license must explicitly permit
          distribution of software built from modified source code.  The
          license may require derived works to carry a different name or
          version number from the original software.  (This is a
  </description>
    <dc:creator>root</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T15:30:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131522">
    <title>Re: Unusual version numbering systems</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131522</link>
    <description>
Thanks for all the replies; I will let upstream know and package 4.21 as
4.2.1 (as it's already been released I it doesn't seem reasonable to
expect that to change...)

Dominic.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dominic Hargreaves</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T15:22:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131521">
    <title>Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/131521</link>
    <description>
Maybe it would be a good idea in the long run to separate the
lintian.debian.org site from a developer accessible copy of
important files from all over the archive. There are certain
things I would want to see changed about the way lintian.debian.org
operates (but note that these are not discussed yet inside the
lintian team due to the sad fact that I was the only real lintian
maintainer in Argentina), and I do not know yet if it reasonable for
us to satisfy both needs (effective use of resources for
lintian.debian.org and developer access to a full lintian lab).

Gruesse,
</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Lichtenheld</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T14:50:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.debian.devel.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.debian.devel.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
