gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc

Bug#506631: Patch fixes bug

Jack Dodds — 2008-12-02T04:07:19

Alexander, I applied the patch, built, and installed enigmail. Now, when I put the cursor on an encrypted message in Icedove, a Mozilla-style dialog box pops up requesting the passphrase. Excellent! This is the same behaviour as before the upgrade from Etch. I further checked by editing the line back into .gnupg/gpg.conf that caused the trouble in the first place, i.e.: gpg-agent-info /home/jack/.gnome2/seahorse-5HDGLT/S.gpg-agent:12517:1 Again, when opening an encrypted message I got the Mozilla-style dialog box requesting the passphrase. If this patch had been in Engimail when I upgraded to Lenny, Enigmail would have worked. I consider the bug to be resolved. Jack Alexander Sack wrote:

Bug#506631: gpg-agent problems in enigmail

Jack Dodds — 2008-12-02T02:26:50

Thank you Alexander. It will take me a couple of evenings to remember how to build Debian packages before I can try this but I definitely will do it as soon as I can. Jack Dodds Alexander Sack wrote:

Bug#507183: marked as done (cups: integer overflow via validation code in of the image size)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-02T02:33:11

Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:02:04 +0000 with message-id ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#507183: fixed in cups 1.3.8-1lenny4 has caused the Debian Bug report #507183, regarding cups: integer overflow via validation code in of the image size to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org immediately.)

Bug#507429: [cfortran] Licence in header file is not up to date!

Kevin B. McCarty — 2008-12-02T02:19:10

retitle 507429 Licence should probably be incorporated in header file severity 507429 normal thanks Bastien, Thank you for pointing this out. I am not sure I agree that this is a bug. The cfortran.h file says (as you quoted): Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: [from cfortran.h] That's all. To the best of my knowledge (IANAL) this just gives the name of the copyright holder (PROPERTY OF BURKHARD BUROW), and says that the license can be found elsewhere. I do not think the above statement is any sort of license because it specifically mentions that the terms for use, modification, copying, and distribution (all of which would be defined by a license) are in cfortran.doc. If you refer to cfortran.doc at /usr/share/doc/cfortran/cfortran.doc.gz you can see that the license at the bottom of that file has been patched in Debian to mention the LGPL: > THIS PACKAGE, I.E. CFORTRAN.H, THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE CFORTRAN.H EXAMPLE [snip non-free original license] It is probably worth clarifying the text of cfortran.h (a

Processed: Re: Bug#507429: [cfortran] Licence in header file is not up to date!

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-02T02:21:10

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org: Bug#507429: [cfortran] Licence in header file is not up to date! Changed Bug title to `Licence should probably be incorporated in header file' from `[cfortran] Licence in header file is not up to date!'. Bug#507429: Licence should probably be incorporated in header file Severity set to `normal' from `serious' Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#507429: GPL or LGPL?

Kevin B. McCarty — 2008-12-02T02:09:39

Hi Steve, Steve Cotton wrote: The latter are correct, upstream gave permission to use it under LGPL. Actually, upstream specifically said "Library GPL" which I interpret to mean LGPL 2 in particular, not 2.1 ("Lesser GPL").

Bug#507244: fasianoptions_270.74-2(mipsel/unstable): missing builddep on libatlas on mipsel (ld: cannot find -lf77blas)

Dirk Eddelbuettel — 2008-12-02T01:12:35

On 29 November 2008 at 13:04, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: | Hi, | | On Sat Nov 29, 2008 at 05:44:52 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/fasianoptions-270.74/src' | > | > gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c EBMAsianOptions.f -o EBMAsianOptions.o | > | > gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c GammaFunctions.f -o GammaFunctions.o | > | > gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c HypergeometricFunctions.f -o HypergeometricFunctions.o | > | > gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -o fAsianOptions.so EBMAsianOptions.o GammaFunctions.o HypergeometricFunctions.o -llapack -lf77blas -latlas -lgfortran -lm -lgfortran -lm -L/usr/lib/R/lib -lR | > | > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lf77blas | > | > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | > | > make[1]: *** [fAsianOptions.so] Error 1 | > | > Very strange. These compile/link options are determined when the main | > r-base-core package is built on the architecture. The Fortran version of the | > Blas would then be missing for _all_ other R package builds involvin

Bug#507183: marked as done (cups: integer overflow via validation code in of the image size)

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-02T00:33:05

Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:17:05 +0000 with message-id ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#507183: fixed in cups 1.3.9-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #507183, regarding cups: integer overflow via validation code in of the image size to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner< at >bugs.debian.org immediately.)

Bug#506684: guile-1.8: includes own definition of jmp_buf type in public header

Ben Hutchings — 2008-12-01T23:40:15

The problem is that these conflict with the C library's definitions which some clients may also include. Currently lilypond FTFBS on ia64 because of this. Ben.

Bug#504918: [Debian Wiki] Update of "NewInLenny" : Upgrade over SSH issue

Michael Biebl — 2008-12-01T23:18:15

Yeah, I do not recommend NM on servers (and the package description clearly states this) or in static environments like a workstation in a lab, where you might upgrade the system over ssh. Well said. Honestly, there is no easy fix for this. Either we restart network-manager, or we tell the user to reboot the system. But for the latter, there is no infrastructure in Debian to do this in a structured way. Cheers, Michael

Processed: your mail

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-01T23:18:08

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org: Bug#483318: crip: FTBFS: applying patch 30dont_overwrite_files to ./ ... failed. Bug#482990: crip: path in dpatch patch walks outside build directory Forcibly Merged 482990 483318. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-01T23:06:16

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org: Bug#483318: crip: FTBFS: applying patch 30dont_overwrite_files to ./ ... failed. Bug reopened, originator not changed. Bug#482990: crip: path in dpatch patch walks outside build directory Bug#483318: crip: FTBFS: applying patch 30dont_overwrite_files to ./ ... failed. Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #482990 has `important'; #483318 has `serious' Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: tagging 507183

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-01T23:09:05

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org: Bug#507183: cups: integer overflow via validation code in of the image size Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#483318: (no subject)

Ryan Niebur — 2008-12-01T23:05:18

reopen 483318 merge 483318 482990 thanks okay, I get it now, will fix.

Bug#504918: [Debian Wiki] Update of "NewInLenny" : Upgrade over SSH issue

Stuart Prescott — 2008-12-01T22:56:44

Hi Franklin, yes, indeed. These are indeed related bugs. In message #10 of #474352, the maintainer notes that this bug should be fixed now, or at least mitigated [ "minimize the downtime (with ethernet it's a matter of seconds)"]. Depending on the ssh settings and the user's reaction to seeing the upgrade hang, that may or may not work out OK. If it is a wireless connection, however, the downtime can be much longer and my experience is that it is likely to hang. Possibly -- but would they use network manager in such a situation? (I don't know). My feeling is that it would be fairly uncommon to upgrade over ssh for machines that actually used network manager; the intersection of upgrade-over-ssh and users of network manager (which is a desktop-centric tool) would seem small. As such, I had thought it was probably just a "document that you shouldn't do this" situation rather than an RC bug in network-manager. In the same way that upgrading over telnet or within a gdm session is not suppor

Bug#507509: subtitleeditor: crashes when opening any subtitle file

George Kiagiadakis — 2008-12-01T22:52:48

Package: subtitleeditor Version: 0.21.1-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable subtitleeditor crashes for me every time I try to open a subtitle file. I have tried with many files, so it's not a file-specific problem. I have generated a backtrace, although it still seems to lack some -dbg packages, but I don't know which ones. Please ask me any more information that you wish to know. I am not familiar with the gtk libraries, so I don't really know how to help more. Backtrace: (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/subtitleeditor (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7fb2a7

Bug#504918: [Debian Wiki] Update of "NewInLenny" : Upgrade over SSH issue

Michael Biebl — 2008-12-01T22:44:56

Two points: - If you have setup a static ip, say for eth0, via /etc/network/interfaces, NM should not manage eth0 and therefore not terminate the connection. - If you use DHCP and NM is managing the interface, it should bring up the device again, when it is successfully restarted. Could you please send me the contents of /etc/network/interfaces. Now that you have upgraded to lenny, what happens if you restart it via /etc/init.d/network-manager? The syslog would also be interesting: grep NetworkManager /var/log/syslog Cheers, Michael

Bug#506684: guile-1.8: includes own definition of jmp_buf type in public header

Neil Jerram — 2008-12-01T22:28:51

2008/11/29 Ben Hutchings decadent.org.uk>: Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what was the problem that this addresses? Neil

Processed: Please remove this package

Debian Bug Tracking System — 2008-12-01T22:13:44

Processing commands for control< at >bugs.debian.org: Bug#507321: hdbc-missingh: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' Bug#507321: hdbc-missingh: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `hdbc-missingh' to `ftp.debian.org'. Bug#507321: hdbc-missingh: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `RM: hdbc-missingh -- RoM; obsolete' from `hdbc-missingh: should this package be removed?'. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#507321: Please remove this package

John Goerzen — 2008-12-01T22:07:17

severity 507321 normal reassign 507321 ftp.debian.org retitle 507321 RM: hdbc-missingh -- RoM; obsolete thanks Current MissingH had AnyDBM split off into a separate package. Due to lack of interest among the user community, I (as upstream for all three relevant packages) have not yet migrated hdbc-missingh over. If I ever do, it would be under a different package anyhow, so this one should be removed.

Bug#490020: La TVIP est-ce pour vous? Informez-vous!

2008-12-01T21:37:27

Bonjours, Il vous est aujourd'hui possible avec http://www.net-tv-live.com de regarder en direct sur votre ordinateur de milliers de chaines de television et poste de radio. C'est simple, pour plus de detail visiter ==> MAINTENANT sur http://www.net-tv-live.com <== Merci De votre ami Xavier http://www.net-tv-live.com http://www.netrichesse.com Bonus: petit guide pour vous permettre de generer des revenus sur internet! http://www.netrichesse.com/miniguide.html You are receiving this message because you have opted in to the Net-TV-Live list. To unsubscribe, please follow this link: