http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2824 <pre> Hello, Is there any information on the level of adoption of CEM? I know it has been interop-tested, and some users are using it, but is it widespread, or still early stages? Also, I am looking for an overview of how CEM relates to XKMS. Is this available somewhere? Pim </pre> Pim van der Eijk 2011-01-23T12:56:14 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2823 <pre> Any one wishing to comment on the CEM I-D draft should do so in the next few weeks. The "Features" I-D is now RFC 6017 so CEM can move forward in the IESG review process. ======================= Request for Comments: 6017 Drummond Group Inc. Category: Informational September 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721 Electronic Data Interchange - Internet Integration (EDIINT) Features Header Field Abstract With the maturity of the Electronic Data Interchange - Internet Integration (EDIINT) standards of AS1, AS2, and AS3, applications and additional features are being built upon the basic secure transport functionality. These features are not necessarily supported by all EDIINT applications and could cause potential problems with implementations. The EDIINT-Features header field provides a means to resolve these problems and support new functionality. </pre> Moberg Dale 2010-12-15T15:52:07 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2822 <pre> Graham Klyne wrote: I think after discussing this with you we agreed that the header should be registered as "provisional". Right, an Informative reference to RFC 3864 would help. </pre> Alexey Melnikov 2010-06-15T11:01:29 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2821 <pre> Alexey Melnikov wrote: If it's a request for permanent registration, I'd be looking for adequate evidence of IETF consensus - a note from you (Alexey) would suffice. (Otherwise, I'd recommend registration as provisional until any applicable last-call process has been completed, with a view to promoting it at that point.) Agreed. The comments about use with AS2, etc, would usefully be included in the "Related information" section of the template. If this is "informational", is it properly under IETF change control? Or is there an EDIInt consortium or body that can more usefully be cited? As a process detail, I think the actual registration would then have to take place during the IANA considerations processing phase of RFC publication? Thus, I think we need to be clear that there's adequate consensus for a permanent registration before activating the publication process. That's an IESG call to make. #g -- </pre> Graham Klyne 2010-06-14T18:53:14 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2820 <pre> Hi Kyle, Kyle Meadors wrote: Yes. I think this should be one or more of "mail", "http" (per RFC 3864): Applicable protocol: Specify "mail" (RFC 2822), "mime" (RFC 2045), "http" (RFC 2616), "netnews" (RFC 1036), or cite any other standards-track RFC defining the protocol with which the header is intended to be used. </pre> Alexey Melnikov 2010-06-14T16:33:35 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2819 <pre> To confirm, my next step would be to resubmit a new version of this draft but include this section below in the IANA consideration section. Question: do I need to specific the protocol as AS2/AS1/AS3 or HTTP/mail? This is a request for a permanent header registration. Header field name: EDIINT-Features Applicable protocol: AS2 (RFC 4130), AS1 (RFC 3335), AS3 (RFC 4823) Status: Informational Author/Change controller: IETF Specification document(s): This I-D (will include a URI) Related information: None. Kyle Meadors DGI * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER This email, including attachments, is confidential and proprietary. It constitutes exclusive communication solely to the addressee. Any entity other than the intended addressee is prohibited from use of this communication for any purpose. This email, including attachments, may not be distributed, whole or in part. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -----Original Message----- From: Graham Klyne [mailt</pre> Kyle Meadors 2010-06-14T16:21:36 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2818 <pre> Dear all, My apologies for the delay in dealing with this. My main comment is that there is no registration template per http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864. Normally, I would expect to see this template included in the IANA considerations section (which, as it stands, isn't really about IANA considerations per se, but a request for expert review - I think there may be a related process issue here which I'll raise separately with Alexey), or submitted separately to IANA per http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864#ref-35 For example, it's not clear to me if this is requesting provisional or permanent registration. I also note that the registration procedure is not cited, which would probably be helpful, though I'm not sure that's a requirement. As for the header field itself, I see no problem with it. #g -- Kyle Meadors wrote: </pre> Graham Klyne 2010-06-12T07:16:42 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2817 <pre> Thanks Alexey. Kyle Meadors DGI * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER This email, including attachments, is confidential and proprietary. It constitutes exclusive communication solely to the addressee. Any entity other than the intended addressee is prohibited from use of this communication for any purpose. This email, including attachments, may not be distributed, whole or in part. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melnikov&lt; at &gt;isode.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:51 AM To: Kyle Meadors Cc: 'Nevil Brownlee'; ietf-ediint&lt; at &gt;imc.org; GK&lt; at &gt;ninebynine.org Subject: Re: update on draft-meadors-ediint-features-header and IANA review requested Kyle Meadors wrote: Nevil/Kyle, I just sent a message to the Secretariat asking to send out the approval message (on behalf of IESG) for this document. But we are still waiting for Graham to approve the new header field. </pre> Kyle Meadors 2010-06-10T16:13:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2816 <pre> Kyle Meadors wrote: Nevil/Kyle, I just sent a message to the Secretariat asking to send out the approval message (on behalf of IESG) for this document. But we are still waiting for Graham to approve the new header field. </pre> Alexey Melnikov 2010-06-10T15:50:56 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2815 <pre> Graham Klyne wrote: Hi Graham, Any news on this? </pre> Alexey Melnikov 2010-06-10T15:24:15 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2814 <pre> This has been sitting in my inbox for nearly a week, so I thought I should acknowledge receipt. It's been a busy time for me, so I haven't domne anything about it yet, but I shall as soon as I can. Probably next week. #g -- Kyle Meadors wrote: </pre> Graham Klyne 2010-06-02T07:42:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2813 <pre>Alexey, Nevil, I have made the changes to the BNF and other comments and re-submit my I-D. Graham, Per conversation with Alexey, I am requesting an IANA expert review on a registering a new http and email header, EDIINT-Features. The request is in the I-D listed below. Thank you. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meadors-ediint-features-header/ Kyle Meadors Drummond Group Inc. Director of EHR Testing Principal, Test Process 817-709-1627 kyle&lt; at &gt;drummondgroup.com Calendar: http://tinyurl.com/KyleMeadors-DGI-Calendar * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER This email, including attachments, is confidential and proprietary. It constitutes exclusive communication solely to the addressee. Any entity other than the intended addressee is prohibited from use of this communication for any purpose. This email, including attachments, may not be distributed, whole or in part. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * </pre> Kyle Meadors 2010-05-28T03:34:48 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ediint/2812 <pre> Dear All, Is this mailing list still active? The last message is from the 5th of May 2008 :-/ Would it be the right place to discuss about "AS2 Restart" (http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-harding-as2-restart-00.txt)? Many thanks in advance for your help! /Patrice </pre> Babelabout 2009-11-18T13:02:22 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.ietf.ediint