http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29770 <pre> I made this change for consistency with the existing Archetypes UIDs, which do not have the dashes. Like Archetype's UID, plone.uuid's are really just opaque strings. (Otherwise, in plone 4.0 you got different looking UIDs for AT vs Dexterity content.) I don't think UUID objects are ever used directly, so this should not be a problem. UIDs should be opaque strings stored on an attribute so there should be no backwards compatibility problems here. In Plone we've always stored a value without dashes in the UID (apart from a brief flirtation with dashes when plone.uuid was first introduced, which may have been my fault anyway.) If the passed in value is a uuid object then I guess uuid.hex should be used instead of str(uuid), but I believe the str() is there in case a unicode object is passed in (you don't want to mix unicode and strings in indexes.) Internally the ZCatalog uses 32bit ints for all set operations, but I could see it being useful for other things. Laurence -----------------------------</pre> Laurence Rowe 2012-05-22T17:22:20 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29769 <pre>Alan, I just had time to run the Plone 4.2 installer. The installation seemed to go fine and the services were installed and started. The "create Plone site" went fine, but when I view the site there are no style sheets or javascripts included - a resource registry issue I suppose. I'm on Windows Vista 64bit as an admin user "root" ;-) HTH, </pre> Larry Pitcher 2012-05-22T17:13:43 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29768 <pre>plone.uuid at the moment has inconsistent use of UUID.__str__() vs. UUID.hex -- MutableAttributeUUID adapter continues to use the former while the IObjectCreatedEvent handler uses the latter (backward-incompatible change as of 1.0.2 and Plone 4.1.4). This leaves me with questions: 1. Why the change prior to 1.0.2, if backward-incompatible for key comparison? To save 4 bytes storage per reference? https://github.com/plone/plone.uuid/commit/d0141d6626f781dbba9f87f6cc9aaf4368869d73 2. If the change is made, we cannot count on key comparisons to work consistently? We need to pick one format? &gt;&gt;&gt; keys = [myuid.hex,] &gt;&gt;&gt; assert str(myuid) in keys # nope 3. In the wild, only Plone 4.1.4 introduces the dash-free representation, and only for new objects. If we are interested in compatibility, it seems we are committed (?) and now must make UUIDs all use the UUID.hex (dash-free) representation? This isn't great for detecting UUIDs with regexes (or the BNF grammar described in RFC 4122) and such, but i</pre> Sean Upton 2012-05-22T16:38:31 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29767 <pre> Sure. Will do and get back to you. Cheers, timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Timo Stollenwerk 2012-05-22T15:44:54 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29766 <pre>I was talking to David today, Timo, and he suggested me to work on this on master instead of doing it on the 4.2 branch (this is because I don't have too much spare time to do this and it would be better to focus on the latest release). could you please add the code analysis stuff to this branch on Jenkins to follow up the impact of the changes I'm making? best regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Héctor Velarde 2012-05-22T15:16:57 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29765 <pre> HV&gt; good to know I'm doing the same way as you ;-) HV&gt; great! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Héctor Velarde 2012-05-22T15:14:15 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29764 <pre> Just be careful: there are some test_suite definitions out there which cannot be taken away. Anything adding doctests is one example. There's also some more creative ways of constructing test suites. As a general rule, I'd run the tests first, write down the number of tests, remove the test_suite's and compare the number of resulting tests against the former number. You should get neither fewer nor more tests. Actually the test discovery code we use is in zope.testrunner. That's basically a backport of the stuff in unittest2. But you don't need unittest2 at all to get this. Hanno ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ __________________________________</pre> Hanno Schlichting 2012-05-22T14:50:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29763 <pre>The 4.2 installer doesn't have buildout.cfg, bootstrap.py, enfold.html, etc. The only files I have in C:\Plone42 are: (folders) bin develop-eggs eggs parts python var (files) enfold.ico unist000.dat unis00.exe I had the same issue with the last 4.2 installer as well. I'm using 64 bit Windows 7 Professional. -- View this message in context: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/win32-installers-4-2-and-4-1-5-please-help-test-tp7555699p7555727.html Sent from the Core Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> noffsin6 2012-05-22T14:21:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29762 <pre>Hi Alan, I just ran the Plone 4.1.5 installer on Windows Vista. The installation went fine, but after I logged in and clicked on "create a Plone site" (with no options selected) I got this error: ---------------------------------------Site Error An error was encountered while publishing this resource. Error Type: KeyError Error Value: profile-Products.TinyMCE:TinyMCE Troubleshooting Suggestions This resource may be trying to reference a nonexistent object or variable profile-Products.TinyMCE:TinyMCE. The URL may be incorrect. The parameters passed to this resource may be incorrect. A resource that this resource relies on may be encountering an error. For more detailed information about the error, please refer to the error log. If the error persists please contact the site maintainer. Thank you for your patience. ------------------------------------------------------------- </pre> Larry Pitcher 2012-05-22T02:15:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29761 <pre>BTW, could you add also some code to detect this kind of code? def test_suite(): from unittest import TestSuite, makeSuite suite = TestSuite() suite.addTest(makeSuite(AnnotationTest)) suite.addTest(makeSuite(MetadataAnnotationStorageTest)) suite.addTest(makeSuite(AnnotationStorageTest)) return suite we have test discovering in unittest2 and we can start removing this on packages that depend on plone.app.testing. Pareto principle tells me that we must start fixing Products.ATContentTypes and Products.Archetypes. I'll take those and fix them tomorrow :-) best regards Héctor Velarde ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/</pre> Héctor Velarde 2012-05-21T20:53:41 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29760 <pre> I'm gonna do it... one package at a time :-) thanks for including this report! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Héctor Velarde 2012-05-21T20:37:51 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29759 <pre>Hello everybody, i started to work on this issue last week, and added a response to http://code.google.com/p/dexterity/issues/detail?id=8 Feedback would be appreciated. Kind regards, Franco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Franco Pellegrini 2012-05-21T15:08:48 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29758 <pre>We've got a new blocker for the Plone 4.2 release. https://dev.plone.org/ticket/12896: Cooking issues with the resource registries. Unable to traverse to served css/js files until the registry is cooked (trigger by saving the registry form or toggling debug mode). This can result in a site without css or js on startup. Confirmation/discussion/fixing appreciated. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Eric Steele 2012-05-21T03:22:03 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29757 <pre>Hanno's just cut it. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/AccessControl/3.0 Eric------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Eric Steele 2012-05-20T15:39:42 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29756 <pre>+1 On 18 May 2012, at 19:14, Sean Upton &lt;sdupton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Martin Aspeli 2012-05-18T18:15:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29755 <pre>Folks, I have an interest in using plone.indexer in some integration tests within a non-GPL library/package that can be used by higher-level GPL-licensed add-ons in Plone (my integration tests just use Products.CMFCore and Zope2 in plone.testing fixtures of my own creation for catalog-related tests). Would the community/foundation consider plone.indexed fit for re-licensing as BSD? http://plone.org/foundation/materials/foundation-resolutions/plone-framework-components-relicensing-policy AFAICT, plone.indexer has no dependencies on GPL packages, as far as I can tell, and seems a good candidate for re-licensing for the same reasons as many of the other packages already re-licensed? Thoughts from key stakeholders (Martin, Hanno, others)? Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will inclu</pre> Sean Upton 2012-05-18T18:14:26 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29754 <pre> Nope, it seems it's not in latest AccessControl. Can someone do a release, so we people can start using these decorators? z. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers </pre> Nejc Zupan 2012-05-18T16:04:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29753 <pre>I cleaned up Products.Tinymce (GSOC branch) and plone.outputfilters. Thanks for the hard work Timo! There are a lot of PEP8 messages due to security.declare* and similar methods in AccessControl. Florian Friesdorf did a nice job adding decorator functionality to those (not sure if it's already released though). Here is a grep to find deprecated methods easier: grep -R '\(failUnless\|failIf\|assert_\|assertEquals\)' On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Jon Stahl &lt;jonstahl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQ</pre> Domen Kožar 2012-05-18T15:49:25 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29752 <pre>If people can help that would be great. http://package.enfoldsystems.com/windows/setup-plone41-4.1.5-5330-win32.exe http://package.enfoldsystems.com/windows/setup-plone42-4.2.0-5330-win32.exe </pre> Alan Runyan 2012-05-18T15:16:57 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29751 <pre>Automated Shame(tm) FTW! Nice work, Timo! :jon On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Timo Stollenwerk &lt;lists-YMfZcoNdYps&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Jon Stahl 2012-05-18T15:12:38 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel/29750 <pre>Some scattered thoughts about cleanup... When we're considering packages that are in core but maybe shouldn't be anymore (such as KSS and wicked), we have a couple options. That's because as of Plone 4.1 we now have *two* Plones: Products.CMFPlone (which is supposed to be the minimal set of dependencies) and Plone (which pulls in everything considered "core" as a dependency, but doesn't necessarily install it, depending on what the admin selects while adding a site). So option 1 is to turn things into optional dependencies (i.e. use conditional imports where necessary to keep things from breaking), and then switch them from being pulled in by Plone instead of CMFPlone. This is what I did for wicked a while ago in a fit of rage after spending an afternoon debugging through its event dispatch when a field is fetched. Option 2 is to remove things from core entirely (but still keep them working as add-ons, as much as possible). This is what I recently did for kupu: in Plone 4.2 it is required by t</pre> David Glick 2012-05-18T12:05:42 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel