<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel">
    <title>gmane.comp.t2.devel</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3911"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3910"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3909"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3908"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3907"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3906"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3905"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3904"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3903"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3902"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3901"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3900"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3899"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3898"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3897"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3896"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3895"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3894"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3893"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3892"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3911">
    <title>Re: T2 support for BeagleBoard?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3911</link>
    <description>
Hi,

t2/trunk:HEAD arm/cortex-a8 optimized binaries just work (tm) on
the BeagleBoard (just checked). We only need to factor in the
u-book and linux26-omap tree to be able to build everything from
scratch for the BeagleBoard. As I know have such a board on my
desk I also added a hardware entry to our homepage:

  http://t2-project.org/hardware/embedded/TI/BeagleBoard/

Enjoy (and patches welcome)!

René Rebe wrote:
</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T18:24:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3910">
    <title>Re: T2 package for newsbeuter</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3910</link>
    <description>
Hi,

Koen Vervloesem wrote:

Thanks! I only tweaked trailing spaces at some lines, the trailing
dot in the Information head-line tag and inserted the build-time
percentage into the .cache file from my quick test build (for
in-system builds the T2 scripts do not have the binutils reference
build time and thus show 100 percent).

Committed revision 31396.

Have a nice weekend,

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T11:23:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3909">
    <title>Re: New package watchdog</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3909</link>
    <description>
Hi,

Marian Aldenhövel wrote:
Great. I white-space cleaned it a little, added a cache and download
checksum:

Committed revision 31389.

Yours,

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-28T08:52:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3908">
    <title>Re: New package watchdog</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3908</link>
    <description>Hi,

On 27.11.2008, at 18:58, Marian Aldenhövel wrote:

I'm just on the way out of the office, so I have not yet taken a  
closer look,
however we have softdog package, but I do not remember to ever use
it:

   http://www.t2-project.org/packages/softdog.html

so without further investigation I don't know either if it's the same.


You're welcome, too :-)

Have a good evening,
   René

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T18:41:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3907">
    <title>Re: Archivista box - missing mpfr, gmp</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3907</link>
    <description>Hi,

On 27.11.2008, at 08:12, helasz&lt; at &gt;gportal.hu wrote:



Yeah - thing is, the Archivista Box OS is built with some slightly  
older,
gradually updated T2 scripts that do not yet have gcc-4.3.

This is mostly because at the time of creation there was no T2
overloaded package support.

You can, of course just modify your local configuration to build it
with trunk scripts and packages.

Yours,

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T18:37:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3906">
    <title>Archivista box - missing mpfr, gmp</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3906</link>
    <description>
Hi All,

In the target Archivista in trunk due to gcc 4.3.2 mpfr and gmp are required.

best regards,

helasz



</description>
    <dc:creator>helasz&lt; at &gt;gportal.hu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T07:12:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3905">
    <title>Re: New package My Media System</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3905</link>
    <description>
Hi,

gx-turbo wrote:

Yes, indeed. My log as 12 of them.

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T17:40:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3904">
    <title>Re: New package My Media System</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3904</link>
    <description>
hi René

Rene Rebe wrote:

yes it built also on my side, although there are errors!
I use MMS as audio player since several weeks without problems.

I think g++ is used, but it catches the wrong lib.

Can you do a grep occasionally on your log please ? 
I expect something like:
error in .../output.o (.eh_frame); no eh_frame_hdr table will be created 

regards
Gerd
</description>
    <dc:creator>gx-turbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T16:59:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3903">
    <title>Re: New package My Media System</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3903</link>
    <description>
Hi,

sorry for the laggy reply - my desk is rather filled with
work :-)

gx-turbo wrote:


Ah yes, I apparently forgot about it because it had a
Priority tag with O(ptional) so it was never built
on my integration reference build.

I wiped the old copyright lines and added a .cache:

Committed revision 31369.


I work arounded it with T2 compiler wrappers, reoving them with
the next fixed update is of course great.

Btw. the -config scripts are old-style and not so prefer (they
are not too handy on cross-build, pkg-config for installation
data query works better.


I added -L/lib* to find -lz, apparently it is not found because
the package messes heavily the compiler arguments, and especially
some -isystem option appears to let GCC not use the standard
system ones.


On my side it built. I can imagine such failuers if C++ files
are finally linked without g++'s help, but just with ld.

Yours,

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rene Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T08:35:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3902">
    <title>Re: glibc 2.8</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3902</link>
    <description>
Well, I prefer real tarball releases, from my point of few
glibc maintenance is in big trouble with the wanna be big
player just messing with it like they want - without even
rleasing tarballs. The situation is like this for years,
now - the glibc releases pop up as snapshots in Fedora and
the others can see where they get the source from.

Of course we can download some CVS tag or snapshot by date -
but good project and release maintenance is something
else. At least from my point of view.

Given they "indicate to have something like a 2.9 release",
now, we'll probably update to something  like that directly,
skipping the 2.8 for which release tarballs never saw the
day of light.

Btw: I even already contacted RMS some years ago regarding
the release pratice of this FSF "flagship" project. On
"06/15/2007 10:49 AM" he replied:


Btw2: http://freshmeat.net/projects/glibc/ top note

Yours,
   Rene

Adam Stirk wrote:


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rene Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T10:23:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3901">
    <title>Re: glibc 2.8</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3901</link>
    <description>Does that mean that we will be upgrading it to 2.9? :)

-----Original Message-----
From: René Rebe [mailto:rene&lt; at &gt;exactcode.de] 
Sent: 24 November 2008 18:46
To: Gerardo Di Iorio
Cc: T2 developers mailing list
Subject: Re: [t2] glibc 2.8

Hahaha,

there now is a tarball-less 2.9:

   http://freshmeat.net/projects/glibc/?branch_id=3522&amp;release_id=288924

What a fun - have fun,
   René

On 13.11.2008, at 10:14, Gerardo Di Iorio wrote:


</description>
    <dc:creator>Adam Stirk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T10:14:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3900">
    <title>Building xen-tools</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3900</link>
    <description>
I want to have Qemu on my T2 partition, so I can play with TLX and
T2-rescue builds inside the emulator. Qemu depends on xen-tools, which
fails to build for me (this is T2 7.0). I've uploaded the log here:

http://www.csc.calpoly.edu/~wtracy/9-xen-tools.err

The offending vmxassist.tmp has three comments at the front starting
with the `#' character. They could be removed without negatively
impacing anything else ... but this is a file generated by the build
script at compile time, so I can't just edit the file and repeat the
build. Argh.

These lines could be trivially removed with
sed s/\#.*^//
but it's not immediately obvious to me how/where I would hook that
command into the build. Is this feasible short of hacking inside of
the Makefile?

compile.patch for this package has a comment from Rene: "Are we the
only folks building these tools?" I have to wonder about that, myself.

</description>
    <dc:creator>William Tracy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T03:32:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3899">
    <title>Re: glibc 2.8</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3899</link>
    <description>Hahaha,

there now is a tarball-less 2.9:

   http://freshmeat.net/projects/glibc/?branch_id=3522&amp;release_id=288924

What a fun - have fun,
   René

On 13.11.2008, at 10:14, Gerardo Di Iorio wrote:


</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:46:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3898">
    <title>Re: New package My Media System</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3898</link>
    <description>
hi René

thanks alot.

some remarks:
did you see the cxfe package I sent 13.Oct. ?
It is an add-on for MMS to play movies with xine.
To play sound, xine-lib is enough.

There is an additional problem with lirc: see my post 13. Oct. I have not
looked into this anymore. Do you have proposal how to proceed with this one
?

For MMS itself I have identified 3 problems:

1. imlib not found at config
2. lz/lncurses not found during link
3. .eh_frame missing during link

1. imlib: I made a proposal for a simple patch/change in MMS, It was
accepted and should be in at least in final release 1.1.0 (using
`imlib2-config --libs`)

2. lz/lncurses: I found a work-around, but was not sure if its generally
working (removing some "-Wl,-nostdlib" from makefiles). If you found a good
solution, great. It took a while for me to understand that this is
independent from #3 .eh_frame.

3. .eh_frame: I still do not understand the details. I still have this
error, but mms is working since several weeks without problems. From my
und</description>
    <dc:creator>gx-turbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T10:35:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3897">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3897</link>
    <description>
Hi all,

Michael Tross wrote:

I like to stress that if this is still lthe case in trunk:HEAD that it's 
a bug - not
a feature.

DHCP must work with just the dhcp keyword in Netconf (formerly known
as ROCK Net :-) without poking kernel modules or creating another
config file such as /etc/dhcpd.conf&lt;whatever&gt; manually.

Guess I should give it a try soonish.

Actually I personally find it quite sad how much regressions ^W random
changes the DHCP 4.0 package had and how much of our time it
already wasted :-(

Btw. We have several alternative, saner and tinier DHCP clients in T2,
on which I'll probably going to explore more in projects:

  dhcpclient

It's a modern client which also monitors the NIC for link changes and
thus intelligently and instantly issues a DHCP request when the
cable is plugged in (and not like the classic ISC one 20 minutes later, 
etc.).

Yours,

</description>
    <dc:creator>René Rebe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T08:27:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3896">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3896</link>
    <description>
In case anyone is curious, networking wasn't coming up because my
default runlevel was 2.

Stone detects eth1 on my machine (my wireless card), but I had to
remove that entry from the conf file because the networking init
script would try to launch it and hang for ~30 seconds on boot.

Also, to my surprise, these days Gmail is acually usable from Links. :-P

</description>
    <dc:creator>William Tracy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T06:24:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3895">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3895</link>
    <description>
I must be going insane. I installed the 7.0-rc2 image, ran ifup eth0,
and could wget www.google.com. (eth0 still isn't coming up
automatically on boot, but I'm sure I can fix that in a few minutes if
I try.)

I could *swear* that it wasn't working the last time I installed that
image. Go figure.

Incidentally, the "Minimal" image includes svn, wget ... and no web
browser. I guess my next task is to build Links. :-)

Everyone, thanks for your patience.

</description>
    <dc:creator>William Tracy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T23:56:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3894">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3894</link>
    <description>
Okay, I booted the rc1 live image, and was able to get the following
output from dhclient:


Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5
Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/

Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1a:a0:fd:97:49
Sending on   LPF/eth0/00:1a:a0:fd:97:49
Sending on   Socket/fallback
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 16
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 15
No DHCPOFFERS received.
No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.


I'm not sure why it's not able to talk to the DHCP server (I'm online
now after rebooting into Fedora, so it's not something simple like a
loose cable) but this looks much more solvable than the previous
situation. </description>
    <dc:creator>William Tracy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T21:50:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3893">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3893</link>
    <description>
Am Samstag, den 22.11.2008, 10:04 -0800 schrieb William Tracy:

On trunk there are known problems with the dhcp package since the 4.0.x
update, this was discussed earlier this year:

http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=18650084&amp;framed=y

You have to setup dhcp client on a target system:

- edit and create a valid /etc/dhclient.conf with at least the single
line: 

  script "/etc/dhclient-script";

- you may have to preload the IPv6 module in /etc/conf/kernel, depending
on your kernel configuration:

  modprobe ipv6

Somehow the ipv6 module is not automatically loaded, even with
  alias net-pf-10 ipv6
in /etc/modprobe.conf.

Michael



</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Tross</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T11:26:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3892">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3892</link>
    <description>
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Adam Stirk &lt;Adam.Stirk&lt; at &gt;brantano.co.uk&gt; wrote:

I tried that, and that time it complained that it couldn't find
'/sbin/dhclient-script'; so I copied /etc/dhclient-script into /sbin,
and got the following output:


Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.0.0
Copyright 2004-2007 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/

/sbin/dhclient-script: line 230: [: =: unary operator expected
/sbin/dhclient-script: line 240: [: =: unary operator expected
/sbin/dhclient-script: line 254: [: =: unary operator expected
/sbin/dhclient-script: line 254: [: =: unary operator expected
/sbin/dhclient-script: line 266: [: =: unary operator expected
/sbin/dhclient-script: line 279: [: too many arguments
No broadcast interfaces found - exiting.


BTW, I said before that this was a 7.0 install. I confused
myself--this is actually a build from Trunk earlier this week. I
remember now that the 7.0 rc 2 wasn't wanting to talk to my flash
drive</description>
    <dc:creator>William Tracy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-22T18:04:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3891">
    <title>Re: Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.t2.devel/3891</link>
    <description>I think this is why I load the ipv6 kernel module at startup (Custom
rocknet script). You can try 'modprobe ipv6' then 'dhclient eth0'. I can
send you a patch for the rocknet script if this is what your problem is.

Regards

Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: William Tracy [mailto:afishionado&lt; at &gt;gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 November 2008 03:43
To: Adam Stirk
Cc: T2 developers mailing list
Subject: Re: [t2] Can't talk to network--DHCP problem?

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:50 PM, William Tracy &lt;afishionado&lt; at &gt;gmail.com&gt;
wrote:

Okay, I can tweak that file all I want, and it seems to have no effect.

I did try dhclient -v, and got this:

Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.0.0
Copyright 2004-2007 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/

Error opening '/proc/net/if_inet6' to list IPv6 interfaces; No such
file or directory
Can't get list of interfaces.

If you did not get this software from ftp.isc.org, please
get the latest from ftp.isc.org and install that </description>
    <dc:creator>Adam Stirk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-22T10:16:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.t2.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.t2.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
