gmane.comp.python.catalog

Re: Copyright footer at http://pypi.python.org/pypi still ends in 2011

2012-05-18T21:09:46

No time.

Martin


_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG< at >python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Copyright footer at http://pypi.python.org/pypi stillends in 2011

Terry Reedy — 2012-05-18T19:15:33

http://pypi.python.org/pypi

Copyright © 1990-2011, Python Software Foundation

Time to update?

Re: PyPI pull request

anatoly techtonik — 2012-05-13T09:02:20

With all respect to abstract theories I can't immediately see how it
applies to Mercurial in this particular case.


The contribution process is two fold. If maintainers are too picky
about bells and whistles surrounding the submitted patches (as I do
too) you can expect a significant drop in amount of people who want to
submit those patches. That's one of the reasons some project have a
lot of contributors and other are not.

Re: PyPI pull request

2012-05-12T19:25:13

I see. The page points to using the graft command; I'll try it out.

Thanks,
Martin

Re: PyPI pull request

Kai Diefenbach — 2012-05-12T17:27:02

Hi,

On 2012-05-12 15:28:11 +0000, martin< at >v.loewis.de said:


I see your point, but this is technically possible with transplant:

http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/TransplantExtension

Regards
Kai

Re: PyPI pull request

2012-05-12T15:28:11

This is not sufficient, is it? If I want to accept change 1 and change 3,
and reject change 2, how can I pull change 3 without also integrating change
2?

Regards,
Martin

Re: PyPI pull request

Daniel Greenfeld — 2012-05-12T15:24:12

This is Martin and Richard's project. If they want to insist on
separate pull requests per feature being worked on, rather than having
to cherry pick and analyze each segment of code you submitted before
accepting it, then that's how they should do it. Of course they
haven't said anything yet, but I'm just saying it's up to them.

Also, the pattern I described to you fits very well within the
beautiful promise of DVCS. The cleaner branching and merging of DVCS
makes this sort of approach wonderful for all parties involved. Rather
than giant, monolithic pull requests with lots of tiny commits, they
get very easy to integrate pull requests.

Smaller, atomic pieces are much easier to handle then larger
multi-task components. Isn't that the promise of OOP and functional
programming? :-)

Danny

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik< at >gmail.com> wrote:

Re: PyPI pull request

anatoly techtonik — 2012-05-12T15:09:44

Hi Daniel,

You're request and proposed action would be nice if it used Mercurial,
but it uses Git + GitHub and have
https://bitbucket.org/loewis/pypi/pull-request/1/fix-imports-add-logging-to-console-inabsolutely
no idea how to apply it to Mercurial + Bitbucket. If I understand you
correctly for every 7 commits in queue I need to make a separate clone
and commit it separately. That's far from the that beautiful promise
DVCS made. =)

All commits are available in pull request separately. If you take
another look at
https://bitbucket.org/loewis/pypi/pull-request/1/fix-imports-add-logging-to-console-in
you'll see there is an ongoing discussion over a questionable commit
with Martin. Feel free to comment on any revision. I can rework them
one by one on request if they are taking too much time to review.

Your wish is valid and well understood, but for specific big features.
For a series of small clean up changes such as this one this places a
more constrain on the person submitting changes. So unless there is a

Re: PyPI pull request

Daniel Greenfeld — 2012-05-12T13:17:41

Anatoly,

Here's a major issues with your pull request:

It's not atomic enough. PyPI is a massive effort so any pull request
should be as small as possible. For example, "running without sentry
client" should be just a single pull request. By combining multiple
"actions" into one pull requests, you've made it harder for the PyPI
authors to evaluate your work. Which means they'll be less inclined to
review it.

Break this up into 3 separate pull requests. It's easy to do with
branching, and the maintainers of the project will appreciate you for
it.

In fact, one thing we did with Open Comparison
(http://djangopackages.com, http://pyramid.opencomparison.org, and
soon http://python.opencomparison.org) that as helped us a lot as
maintainers is write a formal contributing document that spells this
out and more. See:

http://opencomparison.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contributing.html

and in your case, specifically:

http://opencomparison.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contributing.html#how-to-get-your-pull-request-acc

Re: PyPI pull request

anatoly techtonik — 2012-05-12T09:21:05

Richard told me he is busy preparing for the PyCon AU and
administering ongoing PyGame, so no help here.
Martin told it will take time. So, anybody else at least to review and comment?

https://bitbucket.org/loewis/pypi/pull-request/1/fix-imports-add-logging-to-console-in

I also sent mail to PSF requesting a new `pydotorg` account on
Bitbucket, so that there will be a permanent home for official mirror
for PyPI that can be found using Bitbucket search along with other
open repositories for web to send pull requests to.

In the meanwhile there few more clean up changes, one of which loosens
dependency on M2Crypto, which is not installable in virtualenv if you
don't have SWIG installed systemwide. Although it doesn't remove it
completely yet. The goal is to make pycrypto an optional alternative
for M2Crypto for an easy development.

Re: spam on PyPI

2012-05-10T23:29:10

Zitat von David Glick <dglick< at >gmail.com>:


Thanks! Deleted.

Regards,
Martin

Re: spam on PyPI

Richard Jones — 2012-05-10T23:27:23

Thanks for reporting it, and thanks to whoever cleaned it up.


     Richard

spam on PyPI

David Glick — 2012-05-10T22:56:24

Someone is posting spam to PyPI today. Examples:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/drsultan/Spell%20Caster%20and%20spiritual%20healer.%20Call%3B%20%20%20%2B27722820647

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/drsultan/Strong%20Spell%20Caster%20and%20spiritual%20healer.%20Call%3B%20%20%20%2B27722820647

PyPI pull request

anatoly techtonik — 2012-05-09T10:51:53

Hi,

Anybody to merge my changes from
https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/pypi-techtonik ?
--
anatoly t.

Re: PyPI code now on bitbucket

anatoly techtonik — 2012-05-08T14:28:14

Hi,

Noah Kantrowitz <noah <at> coderanger.net> writes:
richard as admins? Then you can just
under your username and fork the
username can be used for your personal


Great news. I may now kill my own mirror. =)
Sorry for the mess - Gmane doesn't allow top posting.

Who not just open `pydotorg` account and move all *.python.org code there? PSF 
looks more like a financial institution than a community that supports this 
stuff. It will make clear that you don't need to be a member of PSF to 
contribute.

Please, CC.

_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG< at >python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Re: PGP key for pip package

David Fischer — 2012-05-01T16:19:15

This is perfect. I had looked on pgp.mit.edu, but I had neglected the
"0x" prefix and my search turned up nothing.

Thanks guys.

-David

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:10 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin< at >v.loewis.de> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG< at >python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Re: PGP key for pip package

Martin v. Löwis — 2012-05-01T10:10:56

If you put "0x0171DF30" into "Search String" at http://pgp.mit.edu/,
it sends you to

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0171DF30&op=index

Regards,
Martin

Re: PGP key for pip package

Georg Brandl — 2012-05-01T07:32:41

I could import it from hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net, but only when searching for
"Leidel", and not for the ID.

Georg

PGP key for pip package

David Fischer — 2012-04-30T15:52:22

Hi,

I've been playing around with PGP signing as it relates to Python
packages. There are relatively few signed packages in Cheeseshop but
one of them is the pip package[1]. Does anyone know where I could get
the public key used to verify this package (key ID 0171DF30)? Perhaps
I am missing something obvious.

-David


[1]  http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pip/1.1

Re: Taking Over Maintainership.

Martin v. Löwis — 2012-04-26T18:50:21

Submit a support request to the PyPI bug tracker (at SF). We will try
to contact the original author ourselves, and if that fails, ask for
some proof that Google indeed given you maintainership to the code.

Regards,
Martin

Taking Over Maintainership.

Ben Timby — 2012-04-26T14:59:36

I recently took over maintainership of the Python queues project at
google code hosting.

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/queues/0.6.2

I would like to be able to update the package in PyPI as well, how can
this be accomplished? I am unable to contact the original author.

Thanks.