<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing">
    <title>gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1066"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1065"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1064"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1063"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1062"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1061"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1060"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1059"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1058"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1057"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1056"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1055"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1054"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1053"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1052"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1051"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1050"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1049"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1048"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1047"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1066">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] FW: NAFIPS'09: Paper Submission Deadline Extended</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1066</link>
    <description>Dear Friends, As you may remember, the organizers approved an interval session at NAFIPS that Weldon Lodwick and myself are organizing. Please submit to this session! 
****************************************************************************************

From: Asli Celikyilmaz [mailto:asli-aFE07iDfcCIb0cFwG/AQJIdd74u8MsAO&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org] 


Dear colleagues,

The deadline for the paper submission for NAFIPS'09 has been extended to January 10, 2009.
We would greatly appreciate your contribution to the success of the conference.
Please visit the NAFIPS 2009 website for recent updates and news (http://nafips2009.ewu.edu/). 
The paper submission website is now OPEN. 
 
Thank you very much in advance for your support.

Best regards,  

**********************************************************
 
NAFIPS'09 -- 28th North American 
Fuzzy Information Processing Society Annual Conference
 
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
June 14-17, 2009
http://nafips2009.ewu.edu/
 
Dear Colleague, 
 
You </description>
    <dc:creator>Kreinovich, Vladik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-04T18:18:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1065">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] UAI 2009: Preliminary call for papers</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1065</link>
    <description>
The 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2009)
    June 18th - 21st, 2009, Montreal, Canada
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~uai2009
                    Preliminary Call for papers

The 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI
2009) will take place on June 19-21, 2009 in Montreal, Canada. UAI
2009 is co-located with ICML 2009 and COLT 2009, and will take place
following ICML 2009 and concurrently with COLT 2009. There will also
be a joint UAI/ICML/COLT workshop day on June 18th.

We encourage submissions that report on theoretical or methodological
advances in modeling, inference, learning and decision making under
uncertainty.  Submissions reporting on novel and insightful
applications of these techniques within intelligent systems are also
strongly encouraged.  Examples of such application areas include, but
are not limited to, computational biology, computer vision, speech
processing, computational linguistics, information retrieval, medical
systems, multi-agent</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Y. Ng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-03T03:44:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1064">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1064</link>
    <description>The attachment contains the

        Third intermediate report (December 4, 2008)

to my simple interval challenge from November 26, 2008.


The current best public algorithm achieves 112.5% of the optimal width.

Please report even now suboptimal solutions if they are within 150%
of the optimal width and make use of ideas not yet present!

Main changes compared to the second report:
- algorithms by John Pryce and myself
- symmetries: I had forgotten the continuous scaling symmetry
- new comments on the problem of minimizing the coefficient of c
   that make it an interesting test problem for global optimization



Arnold Neumaier





A simple interval challenge (November 26, 2008)
---------------------------

In discussions with Nate Hayes, he mentioned the following test problem
(arising from a problem in computer vision) as an example for the
potential efficiency of modal interval arithmetic. With his permission,
I make the problem public, adding performance evaluation criteria
for a public contest.




</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-04T08:19:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1063">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1063</link>
    <description>The attachment contains the

        Second intermediate report (December 1, 2008)

Based on requests, I made the rules a bit more precise;
see the items &lt;new&gt; in the challenge formulation.


The current record is
    [-3.274656,8.832152] (110% of optimal width)
by Nate Hayes, with an unknown algorithm.


Arnold Neumaier






A simple interval challenge (Nov. 26, 2008)
---------------------------

In discussions with Nate Hayes, he mentioned the following test problem
(arising from a problem in computer vision) as an example for the
potential efficiency of modal interval arithmetic. With his permission,
I make the problem public, adding performance evaluation criteria
for a public contest.


Second intermediate report (December 1, 2008)

Based on requests, I made the rules a bit more precise;
see the items &lt;new&gt; in the challenge formulation below.



Challenge (based on a problem posed by Nate Hayes)
---------

Find a cheap and good enclosure for

   f := (a(w^2+x^2-y^2-z^2)+2b(xy-wz)+2c(xz+wy))/(w^2+x^2+y^</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T16:23:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1062">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1062</link>
    <description>Ray Moore schrieb:


1788 &lt;stds-1788-0lvw86wZMd+iIBfGT3fpgSrucL2cRjhM&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;
is the list of the future IEEE interval standard.

Actually, you'd send it to both 1788 and
    interval &lt;reliable_computing-ndL8ECQ03iZGXWuEzt0j4VBd07bTekyB&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;,
which will happen automatically as a reply-all to my first
simple interval challenge mail.

Arnold

</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T07:42:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1061">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Fw: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1061</link>
    <description>Colleagues,

At the suggestion of Arnold Neumaier, I am sending a pdf file of a paper I 
was working on a couple of years ago. It is an unfinished piece of work, but 
may be relevant to the ongoing discussion of the topic of improving interval 
bounds on ranges of values of functions without using box splitting. I was 
attempting to see what can be done in the special case of multinomials.

Ray Moore

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arnold Neumaier" &lt;Arnold.Neumaier-4JhlDu4IDl0juwv8T7myQQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;
To: "Ray Moore" &lt;rmoore17-rN3PHIWzTs1Jm/Hvfsr4+Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: A simple interval challenge


</description>
    <dc:creator>Ray Moore</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T18:32:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1060">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1060</link>
    <description>Dear Prof. Neumaier,

Could you, please, be a little bit more specific about the  
&amp;ldquo;simple interval challenge&amp;rdquo; problem. Are the variables w,  
x, y and z intervals that have the properties: w&lt;0, y&gt;0 and 0 is in x,  
0 is in z? How &amp;ldquo;constant&amp;rdquo; are the interval constants a, b  
and c: can they change their bounds keeping, however, the properties:  
a&gt;0, b and c are symmetric? The answer to these questions makes the  
specificity of the problem considered clearer and can influence the  
efficiency of the solution suggested.
I have had a first try at finding an enclosure of the range sought,  
using: a rearrangement in the form of a sum of two terms and  
application of G-intervals (affine arithmetic). The first (rearranged)  
term turned out to be the one suggested by Prof. Raymond Moore. The  
second term is enclosed using a simple rule for multiplication of  
G-intervals. My enclosure is
[-3.8080,  9.3655]
and is obtained using 13 standard interval operations and 9 G-interval  
operatio</description>
    <dc:creator>kolev.l-G7cQnZ0M4Cw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T12:17:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1059">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1059</link>
    <description>

Yes. This is the ultimate purpose of the challenge.

I'll provide as much detail as I can get from those submitting
answers to the challenge. In particular, I'll try to reprogram
the recipes in Intlab (if they are not yet in this format,
which would be a significant help; see below for a template)
to check the results before putting them online.

It is likely that all tricks can be automatized to work not only
for this example but in more general situations, though it may
not always be easy to decide which trick should be applied when.
So these choices should probably be made in a semi-automatic way
based on statistics on trial inputs and perhaps also guided
by interventions from a graphical user interface.

The results will also show those not so familiar with interval
methods but more concerned about low level implementations which
issues really matter for efficiency in user applications.

The standard should help expert programmers to exploit the
potential of interval methods to the fullest, while not
s</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T17:31:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1058">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1058</link>
    <description>
Ok, fine by me. But what will also be useful is a full description of 
the manipulation that led to the various bounds. This may be indeed 
interesting to see if we can somewhat automatize the process

JPM

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Pierre Merlet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T16:40:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1057">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1057</link>
    <description>


Of course, the box over which the range needs to be enclosed
changes from case to case; only the function is the same.
So one needs an algorithm that applies uniformly over a wide
range of input boxes.

But for the evaluation in a contest, one must provide concrete data.
The box chosen is a fairly difficult case for this function.

Even when a method is fine-tuned to this paricular case, the
computation must provide a proof of enclosure, hence is nontrivial.
It will give insight into what sort of tricks are useful for
creating a more complete routine that works well on all input boxes.

And the same kinds of tricks can be applied or adapted to many other
problems of this kind.

To expose insights and tools are the final objectives in the contest.


Arnold Neumaier


</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T13:55:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1056">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1056</link>
    <description>Jean-Pierre Merlet schrieb:

This is a misunderstanding.

Intended by me for the contest was only category 1, to demonstrate
how much naive techniques can be improved in particular cases that
frequently occur as part of a bigger application, so that tuning it
for optimal performance (and perhaps even putting it into hardware)
is worthwhile.

Category 2 amounts to using a package that does range bounding using
branch and bound, which will yield very accurate ranges but at much
higher costs, not tolerable when the enclosure is needed millions of
time.

So this contest is not about testing the performance of existing
software but about testing (and making public) the bag of tricks
experts have to squeeze the best out of a very limited budget for
one range enclosure.

I am not interested in enclosures that need more than 200 effective
interval operations; this probably eliminates most branch and bound
packages (quite apart from the fact that it is difficult to count
there the number of operations).

The results </description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T12:25:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1055">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1055</link>
    <description>

Arnold, all,

I think that there is a flaw in this test or at least that the results 
should be divided into 2 categories:

1- results provided by interval experts that will spend some time 
re-arranging expressions for this particular case to get the "best" result

2- results provided by general purpose interval software (the one that 
the end-user will use because they don't have the knowledge to do 
otherwise). In that case the data should be provided "as it" because the 
system and bound may be the result of some other calculation and are not 
known in advance.

Best

JPM



</description>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Pierre Merlet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T11:29:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1054">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1054</link>
    <description>First intermediate report (Nov. 27, 2008)



[...]


I had a mistake in my program. The corrected version gets only the
enclosure [-3.6517,9.2223] using 12 real and 54 interval operations,
hence 60 effective operations.
This is 117% of optimal width, and has excess cost 1.7e-3.
(The excess cost is very sensitive to the width.)

Raymon Moore provided a pure rearrangement evaluation
    u=w^2+x^2;v=y^2+z^2;
    s=b*(x*y-w*z)+c*(x*z+w*y);
    f=a*(1-2/(u/v + 1)) + 2*s/(u+v);
with 24 operations, giving the enclosure [-5.8080,11.3655],
which is 157% of optimal width, and has excess cost 0.79.
Note that the rearrangements
    s=(b*x+c*w)*y+(c*x-b*w)*z
    s=(b*y+c*z)*x+(c*y-b*z)*w
of s lead to inferior results.

Mihaly Markot calculated the global extrema to high accuracy.
    The global minimum -2.95607850118520?9 is attained at
    (a,b,c)=(9,1,1), (w,x,y,z)=(-0.6,-0.04181974?8,0.7,-0.2).
    The global maximum 8.00936984210601?8 is attained at
    (a,b,c)=(9,1,-1), (w,x,y,z)=(-0.9,0.2,0.3,0.04115383?9).
    Thu</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T09:16:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1053">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: pointers to typical and non-typicalIA applications</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1053</link>
    <description>

C. Hu and B. Kearfott
Interval Matrices in Knowledge Discovery
in Knowledge Processing with Interval and Soft Computing, 
Eds. C. Hu, B. Kearfott, A. de Korvin, V. Kreinovich, 
pp. 99-118, Springer, 2008.

C. Hu, L. He, and S. Xu,
Interval Function Approximation and Applications,
 in Knowledge Processing with Interval and Soft Computing,
Eds. C. Hu, B. Kearfott, A. de Korvin, V. Kreinovich, 
pp. 119-134, Springer, 2008.

C. Hu
Interval Rule Matrices for Decision Making, 
in Knowledge Processing with Interval and Soft Computing, 
Eds. C. Hu, B. Kearfott, A. de Korvin, V. Kreinovich
pp. 135-146, , Springer, 2008.

C. Hu, and P. Hu
Interval-Weighted Graphs and Flow Networks, 
in Knowledge Processing with Interval and Soft Computing, 
Eds. C. Hu, R. B. Kearfott, A. de Korvin, V. Kreinovich, 
pp. 167-182, Springer, 2008.

C. Hu
Using interval function approximation to estimate uncertainty
in Interval / Probabilistic Uncertainty and Non-Classical Logics, 
Advances in Soft Computing, 46, 
Eds. V. Huynh, Y. Nakamo</description>
    <dc:creator>Chenyi Hu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T15:53:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1052">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] Re: pointers to typical and non-typical IA applications</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1052</link>
    <description>Arnold Neumaier schrieb:


Applications to computer-assisted proofs can be found in
    A. Neumaier,
    Computer-assisted proofs,
    in: (W. Luther and W. Otten, eds.) Proc. 12th GAMM-IMACS Symp.
    Sci. Comp., (SCAN 2006). IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
    http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/papers.html#caps
Applications to uncertain large-scale truss structures are in
    A. Neumaier and A. Pownuk,
    Linear systems with large uncertainties, with applications to
    truss structures,
    Reliable Computing 13 (2007), 149-172.
    http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/papers.html#linunc
Applications to uncertain partial differential equations are in
    A. Neumaier,
    Certified error bounds for uncertain elliptic equations,
    J. Comput. Appl. Math. 218 (2008), 125-136.
    http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/papers.html#pdebounds


Arnold Neumaier


</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T12:11:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1051">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] A simple interval challenge</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1051</link>
    <description>In discussions with Nate Hayes, he mentioned the following test problem
(arising from a problem in computer vision) as an example for the
potential efficiency of modal interval arithmetic. With his permission,
I make the problem public, adding performance evaluation criteria
for a public contest.

Please send results directly to me at &lt;Arnold.Neumaier-4JhlDu4IDl0juwv8T7myQQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;; 
I'll post summaries when something interesting happens.


Arnold Neumaier



Challenge:
---------
Find a cheap and good enclosure for

    f := (a(w^2+x^2-y^2-z^2)+2b(xy-wz)+2c(xz+wy))/(w^2+x^2+y^2+z^2)

given the following bounds on the variables a,b,c,w,x,y,z:

    a in [7,9]
    b in [-1,1]
    c in [-1,1]
    w in [-0.9,-0.6]
    x in [-0.1,0.2]
    y in [0.3,0.7]
    z in [-0.2,0.1]

The computation together with general theoretical results must
constitute a proof that the result is a rigorously valid enclosure
of the range. (Thus, the relevant cost is that of checking that
some data provided are a certificate for</description>
    <dc:creator>Arnold Neumaier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T10:24:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1050">
    <title>Re: [Reliable Computing] pointers to typical and non-typical IA applications</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1050</link>
    <description>Janos Pinter asked for recent surveys considering IA applications. There 
are some recent
developments and surveys in optimization, where especially Janos may be 
interested.

First, there is  survey written by Arnold Neumaier

A. Neumaier, Complete Search in Continuous Global Optimization and 
Constraint Satisfaction,
pp. 271-369 in: Acta Numerica 2004 (A. Iserles, ed.), Cambridge 
University Press 2004.

This survey covers the state of the art of techniques for solving 
general purpose constrained
global optimization problems and continuous constraint satisfaction 
problems,
with emphasis on complete techniques that provably find all solutions. 
Sections on
interval arithmetic, constrained propagation and local optimization of 
important problem
transformations follows, in particular of linear, convex, and semilinear
(= mixed integer linear) relaxations that are important for handling 
larger problems.

In practice, a user needs  a reliable and robust
software that works (in most cases) also for larger pro</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Jansson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T18:53:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1049">
    <title>RE: [Reliable Computing] FW: die Welt online</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1049</link>
    <description>Dear Alexandre,

Many thanks for your clarification. 

I am familiar with Arnold's and others papers, so I did not mean at all to imply that Banhelyi et al, were the first to apply intervals to chaos. There were several other related papers as well, some mentioned by Martine Berz in his SCAN'08 talk. Actually, Banhelyi et al cite several of prior papers in their work.

After re-reading my original posting I agree with you that to those readers who are not familiar with this history this posting may have sounded this way, I apologize for the bad wording. 

The point of my posting was not to claim that this was the first time this is done (this is not), but to emphasize that this paper got a wide publicity. 

Specifically, Banhelyi et al. prove chaos-related properties of a specific (and very natural) system for which chaos was empirically found out in 1999 but not proven until 2008: forced damped pendulum 

$ml \ddot x+ b\cdot x+ mg \sin(x)=A\cos(wt)$ -- probably among the most natural and simple </description>
    <dc:creator>Kreinovich, Vladik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T17:30:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1048">
    <title>[Reliable Computing] FW: die Welt online</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1048</link>
    <description>Dear Friends, 

In their recent paper Balazs Banhelyi, Tibor Csendes, Barnabas M. Garay,
and
Laszlo Hatvani, "A computer-assisted proof of \Sigma_3-chaos in the 
forced
damped pendulum equation, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical System, 
2008, Vol. 7, pp. 843-867

The authors used interval computations to provide a proof of the chaotic
character of a system -- and thus, to confirm empirical observations. 

This paper was cited among the major scientific achievements on the
online site of 
die Welt, one of the major German-language newspapers

http://www.welt.de/welt_print/article2752854/Wissenschaft.html 

Congratulations to the authors! 

Vladik

P.S. The paper can be found on Tibor Csendes' webpage, as
http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~csendes/fdpendul.pdf 


</description>
    <dc:creator>Kreinovich, Vladik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-22T05:13:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1047">
    <title>Re: [Reliable Computing] pointers to typical and non-typicalIA applications</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1047</link>
    <description>Baker, et al,

Thanks for mention our recent work on applying interval computing in
computational finance and economics at SCAN 2008. Here are some of the
results published (or accepted for publication) recently.

1. L. T. He, C. Hu, M. Casey, Prediction of Variability in Mortgage
Rates: Interval-Computing Solutions, , J. Risk Finance, accepted for
publication.

2. L. T. He, C. Hu,Impacts of Interval Computing on Stock Market
Variability Forecasting,  J. Computational Economics, online available
at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10614-008-9159-x, in printing.

3. L. T. He, C. Hu,Midpoint Method and Accuracy of Variability
Forecasting, J. Empirical Economics, accepted for publication. 

4. D. Collins, C. Hu, Studying Interval Valued Matrix Games with Fuzzy
Logic, DOI 10.1007/s00500-007-0207-6, J. Soft Computing, 12(2), 147-155,
2008

5. A. Han,  X. Chen, C. Hu, S. Xu, Interval Computing in Econometrics, 
J. Management Review, in Chinese, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 37-43, 2008

6. L. T. He, C. Hu,Impacts of Interval M</description>
    <dc:creator>Chenyi Hu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-21T22:31:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1046">
    <title>Re: [Reliable Computing] pointers to typical and non-typical IA applications</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing/1046</link>
    <description>Interval analysis has been applied to product design - the early
stages of product design are characterized by uncertainty and
ambiguity, which can be handled by interval methods - this is a recent
application. It is also applied in concurrent engineering, where
multiple stakeholders are involved in collaborative design of
products.
There is a design paradigm called set-based design developed by Ward
et al.(Quantitiave Inference in a mechanical design "compiler") that
also uses interval methods. Ward and his collaborators discovered that
 something analogous to set-based design is being used at Toyota.



On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:50 AM, R. Baker Kearfott &lt;rbk-OKrPIBPxlj+FhjwBz98joA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote:

</description>
    <dc:creator>Noel Titus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-21T20:40:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.mathematics.reliable-computing</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
