<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs">
    <title>gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1913"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1912"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1911"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1910"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1909"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1908"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1907"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1906"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1905"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1904"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1903"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1902"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1901"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1900"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1899"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1898"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1897"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1896"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1895"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1894"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1913">
    <title>[bug #39057] gsl_cdf_chisq_Pinv fails for some values</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1913</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;URL:
  &amp;lt;http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39057&amp;gt;

                 Summary: gsl_cdf_chisq_Pinv fails for some values
                 Project: GNU Scientific Library
            Submitted by: psa
            Submitted on: Thu 23 May 2013 08:32:36 PM GMT
                Category: Runtime error
                Severity: 3 - Normal
        Operating System: all
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

The following parameters cause gsl_cdf_chisq_Pinv to fail - this has been
commented out of cdf/test.c to enable 'make check' to succeed.

  /* Test case reported by Yan Zhou &amp;lt;zhouyan&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;me.com&amp;gt; */
  TEST (gsl_cdf_chisq_Pinv, (0.5, 0.01), 0.99477710813146, TEST_TOL6);





    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  &amp;lt;http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39057&amp;gt;

_______________________________________________
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Alken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T20:32:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1912">
    <title>[bug #39056] gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1_e fails for some test cases</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1912</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;URL:
  &amp;lt;http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39056&amp;gt;

                 Summary: gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1_e fails for some test cases
                 Project: GNU Scientific Library
            Submitted by: psa
            Submitted on: Thu 23 May 2013 08:26:48 PM GMT
                Category: Runtime error
                Severity: 4 - Important
        Operating System: all
                  Status: Confirmed
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

The following test cases are confirmed to fail for the gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1_e
function. They have been commented out of specfunc/test.c to enable 'make
check' to succeed.


  /* Test case from Hatef Monajemi &amp;lt;monajemi&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;stanford.edu&amp;gt; */

  TEST_SF(s, gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1_e, (3.5, -0.5, 5.0, 0.9, &amp;amp;r),
0.5923981284370653465208973272, TEST_TOL2, GSL_SUCCESS);

  /* Test case from Robert L Wolpert &amp;lt;Wolpert&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;stat.duke.edu&amp;gt; */

  TEST_SF(s, g&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Alken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T20:26:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1911">
    <title>[bug #39055] gsl_poly_complex_solve fails on a 15thdegree polynomial</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1911</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;URL:
  &amp;lt;http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39055&amp;gt;

                 Summary: gsl_poly_complex_solve fails on a 15th degree
polynomial
                 Project: GNU Scientific Library
            Submitted by: psa
            Submitted on: Thu 23 May 2013 08:14:21 PM GMT
                Category: Runtime error
                Severity: 3 - Normal
        Operating System: all
                  Status: Confirmed
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

The following code demonstrates a failure of gsl_poly_complex_solve(). I have
commented this out from poly/test.c since it will cause that test to fail
until the problem is fixed.

The QR reduction of the polynomial companion matrix does not converge. The
eigenvalues of the companion matrix can be successfully computed with
gsl_eigen_nonsymm(), but this is not a good long-term solution - the qr
algorithm should be fixed&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Alken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T20:14:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1910">
    <title>MISER subdivision bug</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1910</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I found what I think is a bug in miser.c.
In the function estimate_corrmc, line 689 in the file
  sigma_l[i] = sqrt (fsum2_l[i] - fsum_l[i] * fsum_l[i] / hits_l[i]);
is supposed to be the variance in the left hand region with the division in
the i-axis ,
Shouldn't this be:
  sqrt( ( fsum2_l[i] / hits_l[i] - fsum_l[i] * fsum_l[i] ) / (hits_l[i] -
1) )
and correspondingly for the right hand variance? Or is there some subtlety
I am missing?

Rudy.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rudy Arthur</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T20:49:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1909">
    <title>Re: bug report</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1909</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Does this happen atop version 1.15, the latest release? Version 1.9 is
quite old.

- Rhys

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rhys Ulerich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-01T11:22:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1908">
    <title>Re: Question concerning code sequences in GSL</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1908</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Yes I believe the first line needs to be changed to:

struct powell_params * params = (struct powell_params *)p;

Thanks for finding this

Patrick

On 04/30/2013 06:03 AM, David Faustner wrote:



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Alken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T15:20:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1907">
    <title>ATOM-Feed does not validate</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1907</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

please check
http://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsavannah.gnu.org%2Fnews%2Fatom.php%3Fgroup%3Dgsl

as it says:

Sorry

This feed does not validate.

    line 228, column 100: XML parsing error: &amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;:228:100:
undefined entity [help]

        ... UINT_MAX [&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="/bugs/?24897"&amp;gt;bug&amp;amp;nbsp;#24897&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;]

-&amp;gt; HTML entities are not allowed in plain XML...

Best regards,
 Michael Bunk

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Bunk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T12:13:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1906">
    <title>Question concerning code sequences in GSL</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1906</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear GNU Scientific Library Team,

 

I've been studying section 35.3: "Providing the function to solve"  in the
GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual and I deal with a command sequence,
where I'm not sure if it is stated correctly.  My question relates to the
powell function according to 

 

     struct powell_params { double A; };

     

     int

     powell (gsl_vector * x, void * p, gsl_vector * f) {

        struct powell_params * params

          = *(struct powell_params *)p;

        const double A = (params-&amp;gt;A);

        const double x0 = gsl_vector_get(x,0);

        const double x1 = gsl_vector_get(x,1);

     

        gsl_vector_set (f, 0, A * x0 * x1 - 1);

        gsl_vector_set (f, 1, (exp(-x0) + exp(-x1)

                               - (1.0 + 1.0/A)));

        return GSL_SUCCESS

     }

 

The powell function gets a pointer p to a structure of unknown type (void) as
an argument. So, the content of p is an address of a structure. With the
command (struct powell_params *)p the pointer&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Faustner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T12:03:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1905">
    <title>bug report</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1905</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi there!
I got the following failure after running 'make check &amp;gt; log 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1'.
My Operating System is Debian 6.0 amd64.

Making check in sort
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/eric/Downloads/gsl-1.9/sort'
make  test
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/eric/Downloads/gsl-1.9/sort'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I..    -g -O2 -c test.c
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc  -g -O2   -o test  test.o
libgslsort.la ../permutation/libgslpermutation.la ../vector/libgslvector.la ../block/libgslblock.la ../ieee-utils/libgslieeeutils.la ../err/libgslerr.la ../test/libgsltest.la ../sys/libgslsys.la -lm 
gcc -g -O2 -o test
test.o  ./.libs/libgslsort.a ../permutation/.libs/libgslpermutation.a ../vector/.libs/libgslvector.a ../block/.libs/libgslblock.a ../ieee-utils/.libs/libgslieeeutils.a ../err/.libs/libgslerr.a ../test/.libs/libgsltest.a ../sys/.libs/libgslsys.a -lm
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/eric/Downloads/gsl-1.9/sort'
make  check-TESTS
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/eric/Downloads/gsl-1.9/so&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T11:02:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1904">
    <title>Re: undesired behavior of gsl_stats_sd</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1904</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;FWIW, I disagree. With only one data point you have no idea what the 
variance is, and nan is the natural return value.


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Johansson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-25T23:53:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1903">
    <title>Re: undesired behavior of gsl_stats_sd</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1903</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Do you want gsl_stats_sd_with_fixed_mean instead of gsl_stats_sd?

http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Mean-and-standard-deviation-and-variance.html

- Rhys


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rhys Ulerich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-24T21:15:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1902">
    <title>undesired behavior of gsl_stats_sd</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1902</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

The output of the following test code is nan. I don't think this is the
desired behavior for users. When number of input data is 1, I think it is
more reasonable to say standard deviation is 0 instead of nan.

thanks,
Ming

#include &amp;lt;iostream&amp;gt;
#include &amp;lt;gsl/gsl_statistics.h&amp;gt;

itn main()
{
    double data[1] = {1.0};
    double sd = gsl_stats_sd(data, 1, 1);
    std::cout &amp;lt;&amp;lt; sd &amp;lt;&amp;lt; std::endl;
    return 0;
}

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ming Ji</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-24T16:23:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1901">
    <title>(no subject)</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1901</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;make  check-TESTS
make[2]: Entering directory `/clars/gsl-1.15/histogram'
FAIL: gsl_histogram_fprintf and fscanf [36]
FAIL: test.exe
==================
1 of 1 test failed
==================
Makefile:453: recipe for target `check-TESTS' failed
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/clars/gsl-1.15/histogram'
Makefile:575: recipe for target `check-am' failed
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/clars/gsl-1.15/histogram'

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pongetti, Thomas J (3286</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T19:40:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1900">
    <title>wrong formula for BFGS update in gsl_multimin?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1900</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've had some trouble with non-converging minimizations using the
gsl_multimin_fdfminimizer_vector_bfgs minimizer, which finally led me to
look into the code. The comments in 'vector_bfgs.c' and 'vector_bfgs2.c'
read

/* This is the BFGS update: */
/* p' = g1 - A dx - B dg */
/* A = - (1+ dg.dg/dx.dg) B + dg.g/dx.dg */
/* B = dx.g/dx.dg */

where, as far as I can see, p' is the new search direction, g1 and g
both denote the new gradient, dx is the position change and dg the
change in the gradient after the line search.

All the literature I've found on the BFGS method defines the new search
direction as p' = B^(-1) g, where B^(-1) is the BFGS estimate of the
inverse Hessian, defined trough outer and inner products of dx and dg
and the inverse Hessian B_prev^(-1) of the _previous_ iteration. (See,
e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BFGS_method). Using these expressions,
I can only reproduce the formula from the comments for the special case
where B_prev^(-1) is the identity matrix. I've also compared, during a&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martin Wiebusch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-19T00:43:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1899">
    <title>Memory optimization in akima interpolation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1899</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I checked the akima memory allocation and found some potential optimizations:

 * It is sufficient to allocate (size - 1) doubles for the spline coefficients b, c and d of akima_state_t.

 * It is sufficient to allocate (size + 3) doubles for the divided differences _m of akima_state_t.

 * The divided differences _m of akima_state_t are only accessed in akima_calc and akima_init / akima_init_periodic, hence could be freed earlier at the end of the calculation of the spline coefficients b, c and d in akima_calc.

Best regards,
Thomas Beutlich

--

http://tbeu.de


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Beutlich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T14:59:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1898">
    <title>Invitation to connect on LinkedIn</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1898</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;LinkedIn
------------



I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- JongKwan

JongKwan Kim
Research Assistant at Utah State University
Greater Salt Lake City Area

Confirm that you know JongKwan Kim:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/amzjnv-hfe9ifvf-2p/isd/12394142958/NhQfousI/?hs=false&amp;amp;tok=3wvdIqzsYmklI1

--
You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/amzjnv-hfe9ifvf-2p/qG1nLK-EHylaV3JK4GMM3u2qVg/goo/bug-gsl%40gnu%2Eorg/20061/I4106544415_1/?hs=false&amp;amp;tok=2_mhhT3FYmklI1

(c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.


  

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>JongKwan Kim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-11T18:30:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1897">
    <title>[bug #36197] reserved identifier violation</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1897</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Additional Item Attachment, bug #36197 (project gsl):

File name: 36197a.diff                    Size:118 KB
File name: 36197b.diff                    Size:179 KB


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  &amp;lt;http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36197&amp;gt;

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Markus Elfring</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-30T21:35:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1896">
    <title>Re: GSL 1.15 fails make check on Mac</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1896</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Almost a feature :).
This issue has something to do with gcc optimizations.

Possible workarounds:
1. Use CFLAGS="-Os" instead of the default -O2
2. Use clang instead of gcc

See archive of the mailing-list for details.

Richard Outerbridge wrote:


- -- 
С уважением, Алексей Александрович Илларионов.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRUTI3AAoJEEBWYSFzoNKeir8IAOpAVrUqPNp7Dww2apCEKQra
e8NQ3f56Y4/PuCQhhJEYNsay6c/wiL3AW+tr2Bln3C92+7KkpCbZtSpmRgrxwLrg
/veJZG/ON+TOyvIuYs2cobMkQDIiNbdZfwohJFPc+6HtgVEPDH1ugTdRbxVLhSNr
4cMPOfqViyf3qoiHQzuua3tXw1fHm88Ww43dHkW9+VcJZyQLRvyzSGlqZTW1VuM7
Ch7ekpc/+OkrZXCtf5yn3NhkmU3JUFjZTUgGc4NtOv8lUiFkSoKizYalXZheqK9N
lDRc5FAC9eTgkH8MDdb6vX50wGUxmUIeNIB1pF56aV+SroGfilRAO4L2fxwScwQ=
=TqxM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alexey A. Illarionov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-26T05:29:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1895">
    <title>GSL 1.15 fails make check on Mac</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1895</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Mountain Lion OS X 10.8.3 (12D78)
12.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 12.3.0; root:xnu-2050.22.13~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

gcc i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00)

./configure
make
make check

many (but not all) checks in linalg fail.
first FAIL is:
FAIL:   SV_decomp (3x3) A=[ 0, 0, 0; 0, 0, 1; 1, 1, 0] [852]
(several hundred later)
last FAIL is:
FAIL: SV_decomp_mod (4x4) A=[ 1, 1, 1, 1; 1, 1, 1, 1; 0, 1, 0, 1; 0, 0, 1, 1] [233613]

if the linalg tests are bypassed, all other checks pass.
__outer



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Richard Outerbridge</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-25T14:14:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1894">
    <title>Re: Bug in eigenvalue decomposition of a nonsymmetricmatrix</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1894</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sorry for the late reply. I had a chance to look into this, and you are 
correct that your matrix causes GSL nonsymmv to fail.

In fact, if you check the return value of gsl_eigen_nonsymmv() it will 
be 11, or GSL_EMAXITER, meaning the solver failed to find all 
eigenvalues within the allotted number of iterations. In this case, 
according to the documentation, the eigenvectors are not even computed, 
so the eigenvectors you printed out are just garbage.

The eigenvalue solver failed to converge, most likely because your 
matrix is ill-conditioned and the entries vary wildly in magnitude, and 
the double-shift algorithm was unable to find appropriate shifts to 
break off a new eigenvalue block. The LAPACK library uses a more 
sophisticated algorithm than the GSL which is able to handle your 
matrix, so I'd recommend using that for these types of matrices. In the 
mean time, I'll try tinkering with the shift calculation to see if GSL 
can be improved to work with this type of matrix.

Thanks for the report an&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Alken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-23T20:15:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1893">
    <title>[PATCH] Re:  installing gsl</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs/1893</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

The problem is that 'gsl/Makefile.am' defines some targets ('all' and 
'clean') that normally is created by Automake and thereby mess up the 
dependencies crafted by Automake, so there is no dependency that clean 
and install should depend on all.

The solution is to use *-local targets as documented by Automake. Please 
find a patch attached.

Cheers,
Peter

--- Makefile.am2013-03-22 09:48:59.358824603 +1000
+++ Makefile.am.new2013-03-22 09:48:43.471826950 +1000
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -10,8 +10,6 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;
 rm -f gsl*.h
 
 
-all: all-am header-links
+all-local: header-links
 
-clean: clean-am remove-links
-distclean: distclean-am remove-links
--rm -f Makefile
+clean-local: remove-links
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Johansson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T23:54:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.lib.gsl.bugs</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
