http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26640 <pre> I'm not sure what you mean. If you meant that rejections *should* be removed, then I disagree. If you meant that rejections could be removed to facilitate fixing the approval problem, then I agree that I don't really care about rejections, and it's unclear why rejected plugin calls would stay. The administrator can't send a message explaining the rejection to the editor, so I don't see how a rejection can be useful to editors. I'm not sure what you mean by "removing rejected all pending", but this is the step which may not be as easy as it seems. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Filipus Klutiero 2012-05-16T23:45:18 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26639 <pre>I digress. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, LRRC IT Department &lt; techsupport-OwpFwPqgrgdrovVCs/uTlw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: </pre> Robert Plummer 2012-05-16T21:55:23 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26638 <pre>I'm sorry, this does not work from CLI. When running the script from a command line it is impossible to determine what the baseurl should be because the environment variables that are set by the web server are not present. We need to specify this value in a config file or in a database. On 5/16/2012 4:33 PM, Robert Plummer wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ TikiWiki-devel mailing list TikiWiki-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel </pre> LRRC IT Department 2012-05-16T21:15:36 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26637 <pre>In lib/smarty_tiki/resource.wiki.php 13 * \brief Smarty plugin to use wiki page as a template resource 14 * ------------------------------------------------------------- 15 * File: resource.wiki.php 16 * Type: resource 17 * Name: wiki 18 * Purpose: Fetches a template from a wiki page 19 * ------------------------------------------------------------- 20 */ 21 function smarty_resource_wiki_source($page, &amp;$tpl_source, $smarty) 22 { 23 global $tikilib, $user; 27 $tpl_source= tra('Permission denied: the specified wiki page cannot be used as Smarty template resource').'&lt;br /&gt;'; 28 // TODO: do not cache ! and return the message only once should be enough... 29 return true; 30 } 31 32 $info = $tikilib-&gt;get_page_info($page); 33 if (empty($info)) { 34 return false; 35 } In line 27 above, it wou</pre> Pete Jalajas 2012-05-16T20:55:32 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26636 <pre>I believe the base URL for tiki can be had from TikiLib::tikiUrl(); On May 16, 2012 3:41 PM, "LRRC IT Department" &lt;techsupport-OwpFwPqgrgdrovVCs/uTlw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ TikiWiki-devel mailing list TikiWiki-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel </pre> Robert Plummer 2012-05-16T20:33:28 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26635 <pre>I am having trouble with Daily Reports feature (using trunk HEAD). The links in the report all start with http://c: instead of the proper url. The code for creating these reports is using a global $baseurl variable. The problem is that this variable will not be properly set when calling a script from the command line without using wget or curl. I am thinking of adding a new preference to specify the baseurl for CLI scripts. Is this a good approach? Does Tiki already have this (I could not find it in docs)? Thank you. --- Best regards, Nethanel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ TikiWiki-deve</pre> LRRC IT Department 2012-05-16T19:38:57 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26634 <pre>Arild - the problem is that unless the scope for the edit_structures permission is set to 'object' then you cannot grant this permission on an individual structure page since it is simply not listed in the permissions admin screen. So I think your suggested test below is impossible to do. And I'm not sure that my problem is solved for the same reason, even if an underlying permission check is now done. geoff _____ From: Arild Berg [mailto:bergar-wvxZZ5UFmn7tSSmVQiiApQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org] Sent: 16 May 2012 16:15 To: 'Tiki developers' Subject: Re: [Tiki-devel] Tiki9 testing - category admin not showing all thepermissions available Hi Xavi, In structures, when creating a new page, the direct object permissions will be inherited for users with either admin permissions or edit-page + edit-structure permissions. The inherited permissions are copied from the "parent" page. To test. for a user without global editing rights, grant direct permissions on a structure page. (edit-page and edit-str</pre> geoff< at >enmore 2012-05-16T17:57:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26633 <pre>Hi Xavi, In structures, when creating a new page, the direct object permissions will be inherited for users with either admin permissions or edit-page + edit-structure permissions. The inherited permissions are copied from the "parent" page. To test. for a user without global editing rights, grant direct permissions on a structure page. (edit-page and edit-structure rights). When the user creates a new structure page (using "Add Page"), the new page will also be editable for the same user, since the direct permissions are inherited. Thus a user should be able to edit the page tree, given permissions to a single root page. Note that direct object permissions override all other permissions settings, and that this functionality should be used with care. In the wiki admin the copying of these direct permissions can be disabled. Hope this helps Note that Geoff's problem mentioned below is not exactly the same, but is fixed/included in the same commit, due to a change in the underlying perm</pre> Arild Berg 2012-05-16T15:15:00 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26632 <pre>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:03 AM, LRRC IT Department &lt;techsupport-OwpFwPqgrgdrovVCs/uTlw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: Here is: https://sourceforge.net/users/lrrcenter Torsten? Thanks! </pre> Marc Laporte 2012-05-16T13:47:53 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26631 <pre>My SF username is lrrcenter. I also tried to register on tiki.org, but never received a validation email. Thank you. --- Best regards, Nethanel them in -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- threats. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> LRRC IT Department 2012-05-16T13:03:09 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26630 <pre>Hi Nethanel! What is your SourceForge username? Better work in trunk than in patches :-) Thanks! M ;-) On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:36 PM, LRRC IT Department &lt;techsupport-OwpFwPqgrgdrovVCs/uTlw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: </pre> Marc Laporte 2012-05-16T12:53:06 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26629 <pre>Nethanel, awesome! (I've been for months after some coder to implement this type of feature!) +1 to have this implemented in 9x LTS at some point (9.1, since I guess it's too late for 9.0) Jonny, what you say would be (imho) an improvement that could be added, if you wish, in a later stage to this improvement made by Nethanel. Commit early, commit oftern... Cheers Xavi On 16/05/12 11:59, Jonny Bradley wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Xavier de Pedro 2012-05-16T10:10:40 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26628 <pre> Hi Nethanel I've wanted this for a long time, but never got round to writing it! I would rapidly add a buffer of some sort so that when someone does N modifications to an object within M minutes (both settable prefs) then it just sends out one mail of the accumulated changes in the diff (in lovely html form of course! :) I'll try and review the patch properly soon, but one little issue is that we've always aimed to make most of Tiki available on shared (simple) hosting, so an alternative to cron would be nice. I thought such a thing does exist in Tiki (like WP's "poor man's cron") but can't find it now... We could also do with a consistent way of organising php files that need to be called by the shell or cron... but that's enough for now! Thanks again, and welcome! jonny On 15 May 2012, at 22:36, LRRC IT Department wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and</pre> Jonny Bradley 2012-05-16T09:59:44 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26627 <pre> Surely the only "problem" ones are previously approved ones, no? So my thoughts would be: * Close the site! * Make sure i only have approved plugins by removing rejected all pending (there may be unchecked ones on unused pages) * Do the upgrade (where previously approved plugins will need re-approving) * Approve all pending (which should be only the ones that were approved before) * Open the site Rejected ones will appear as pending as pages get viewed again, so carry on as before... Personally i don't think running a site with rejected plugins on is a good idea, the page or whatever should be fixed to not contain "bad" content, i would have thought, but then i don't run any "public" sites like this. jb On 15 May 2012, at 19:49, Filipus Klutiero wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussi</pre> Jonny Bradley 2012-05-16T09:51:28 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26626 <pre>Arild, what should be done (if structure permissions are not modified to allow object permissions at structure level, regardless of global permissions on structures), so that a non-admin users can be granted permissions to edit 1 structure, but not all the others... I'm willing to test, but I don't6 fuly get what is the expected procedure, without object perms on structures, that this behavior can be achieved. Any pointers appreciated. Xavi P.S. I've been pursuing to have permissions on local structures in tiki sites since a few years ago already ... (I'm very concerned with this limitation in tiki already with structures; and imho, this should be achievable without using categories in an optimum tiki implementation) On 05/05/12 09:38, Arild Berg wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discu</pre> Xavier de Pedro 2012-05-16T07:41:26 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26625 <pre>Hi Duane: Beyond my skills, I'm afraid (I hope someone else using BBB and with the requried skills can include that in their roadmap). We will also benefit comunity-wise speaking (tiki webinars list so many fake events already...) I just wanted to add to your comment that, as far as I know, there is no way from within tiki to indicate which recordings need to be tagged as unpublished, and or deleted. And for what I understood at the bbb-setup list and their documentation pages, there is no easy administration page from within bbb to do that. Cheers Xavi On 15/05/12 22:22, Duane Kennedy wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_________________</pre> Xavier de Pedro 2012-05-16T07:05:04 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26624 <pre>My 2 cents: I tried the refresh function yesterday in our 9x production site (a few hundred wiki pages; just 1 year old tiki site), with 128 Mb allowed in php.ini, and it just hit "memory exhausted" php error the 10 times I tried (even if after every few trials, I saw a few records in tiki-plugins.php that I could then validate) So yes, some carefull implementation would be needed, also (or at least) regarding memory consumption. Xavi On 15/05/12 20:49, Filipus Klutiero wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ </pre> Xavier de Pedro 2012-05-16T07:01:17 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26623 <pre>Hello, I installed Tiki very recently and I am still exploring the various features. I was interested in deferring notification delivery, so as to speed up the UI and to prevent problems in case the SMTP mail server is slow or not responding. Attached is a patch (for 9.x branch, also works with 8.x) that intercepts email messages just before they are sent out and stores them in a database. A cron job can then be run to actually send these messages (script included) asynchronously. It is very similar to the Daily Reports feature, but is working on a lower level (and can be used together). I would appreciate any comments about this approach. Thank you. --- Best regards, Nethanel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in m</pre> LRRC IT Department 2012-05-15T21:36:27 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26621 <pre>Hi Folks, I've noticed the BBB plugin for Tiki doesn't take recording published status into effect. I know BBB recording admin panel allows setting recordings to "unpublished", so it would be great if the getRecordings function in bigbluebuttonlib.php could incorporate a filter to exclude unpublished recordings from the recordings array. Sadly, the implementation of such a filter is outside my graphic designer brain's ken. Anyone else up for the challenge? Cheers, Duane ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________ TikiWiki-devel mailing list TikiWiki-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https:/</pre> Duane Kennedy 2012-05-15T20:22:35 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26620 <pre>http://www.cmsday.fr/ Anyone going? </pre> Marc Laporte 2012-05-15T20:05:58 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel/26619 <pre>I don't think rejections should be removed after the upgrade any more than before the upgrade. If I understand correctly that you're saying the installer could verify the number of calls pending approval before the upgrade and if that's 0, approve any call showing as pending approval after the upgrade, that was my idea as well, but it really wasn't as easy as it looks on the actual installation I tested it on. There were about 20 calls showing as pending approval in the beginning, but we couldn't see any of these items as actually requiring approval. Some were associated with pages which showed no plugin calls lacking approval, others didn't even show which object they came from. The refresh function didn't reduce that since it only picks up those on wiki pages. So we can't delete all pending calls then refresh (at best, we could - perhaps - delete pending calls on wiki pages). Also, in any case, parsing all pages will take some time, so such a tool would need a careful implementation. On 201</pre> Filipus Klutiero 2012-05-15T18:49:35 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.cms.tiki.devel