gmane.comp.apache.jcp-open

access to the svn repository of JPA TCK version 2. and 2.0

Pinaki Poddar — 2013-05-14T18:52:01

Hi,
   Please grant me access to the svn repository of  JPA TCK version 2.1 and
2.0.
  i have filed at NDA earlier which has been approved.

Regards --

Pinaki Poddar
Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project           http://openjpa.apache.org/
JPA Expert Group Member
Application & Integration Middleware

Access to JPA 1.0 TCK?

Kevin Sutter — 2013-04-12T20:21:30

Hi,
Per the process, I requested access for the OpenJPA project to use the JPA
2.0 TCK back in Jan.  That has worked out great!  We are in the process of
creating a new OpenJPA 1.2.3 release which depends on the JPA 1.0
specification.  Do we have the JPA 1.0 TCK available for use?  We must have
had one at one point since somebody claimed that we passed the TCK...  :-)

What probably complicates this a bit is that JPA 1.0 was part of the EJB
3.0 family of specifications.  But, when I go out to the apache tck repo, I
don't see a separate "ejb" directory and I couldn't find it under javaee
either...

Any pointers or suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks!

Kevin Sutter
Apache OpenJPA PMC

[ANNOUNCE] MyFaces Core v2.1.11 Release

Leonardo Uribe — 2013-04-02T17:03:19

The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of MyFaces
Core 2.1.11.

MyFaces Core is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 2.1 implementation as specified
by JSR-314. MyFaces Core has passed Sun's JSR-314 TCK and is 100%
compliant with the JSR-314 specification.

MyFaces Core 2.1.11 is available in both binary and source distributions.

    * http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html

MyFaces Core is also available in the central Maven repository under
Group ID "org.apache.myfaces.core".

Release Notes - MyFaces Core - Version 2.1.11

Bug

    * [MYFACES-3659] - Conditional include of scripts and stylesheets
    * [MYFACES-3660] - Component resource added using
< at >ResourceDependency annotation from a facelet component should have an
id defined by facelets
    * [MYFACES-3663] - UIViewRoot.createUniqueId() should generate
unique ids for all the component tree.
    * [MYFACES-3665] - f:metadata section removed when refresh view
and is not included in the template directly
    * [MYFACES-3666] - IE8 with XHR turned

[ANNOUNCE] MyFaces Core v2.0.17 Release

Leonardo Uribe — 2013-04-02T17:01:17

The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of MyFaces
Core 2.0.17.

MyFaces Core is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 2.0 implementation as specified
by JSR-314. MyFaces Core has passed Sun's JSR-314 TCK and is 100%
compliant with the JSR-314 specification.

MyFaces Core 2.0.17 is available in both binary and source distributions.

    * http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html

MyFaces Core is also available in the central Maven repository under
Group ID "org.apache.myfaces.core".

Release Notes - MyFaces Core - Version 2.0.17

Bug

    [MYFACES-3659] - Conditional include of scripts and stylesheets
    [MYFACES-3660] - Component resource added using
< at >ResourceDependency annotation from a facelet component should have an
id defined by facelets
    [MYFACES-3663] - UIViewRoot.createUniqueId() should generate
unique ids for all the component tree.
    [MYFACES-3665] - f:metadata section removed when refresh view and
is not included in the template directly
    [MYFACES-3666] - IE8 with XHR turned off fails

Re: Fwd: Your JCP NDA

Mark Thomas — 2013-03-13T12:20:48

Done.

Mark

AUTO: Daniel Bandera is out of the office until Monday, January 9, 2011 for the US Winter Holidays (returning 2013-03-18)

Daniel Bandera — 2013-03-12T22:01:28


I am out of the office until 2013-03-18.




Note: This is an automated response to your message  "Fwd: Your JCP NDA"
sent on 03/12/2013 11:52:35.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

Fwd: Your JCP NDA

Rick Curtis — 2013-03-12T17:52:35

Please authorize access to the Sun JPA TCK SVN repo. I have submitted the
NDA and it has been acknowledged by the secretary.

Thanks,
Rick

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Craig L Russell <clr-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Your JCP NDA
To: Rick Curtis <curtisr7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org>
Cc: secretary-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org

Dear Rick Curtis,

This message acknowledges receipt of your NDA, which has been filed in the
Apache Software Foundation records.

Warm Regards,

New and updated TCKs available

Mark Thomas — 2013-03-06T23:01:38

I have just uploaded the following to our private TCK repo:

Java EE TCKs
 - Updated Java EE 6 exclude list
 - Updated Java EE 5 exclude list

JASPIC TCKs
 - New 1.1 TCK

JSF TCKs
 - New 2.2 TCK

JAX-B TCKs
 - Updated 2.2 exclude list

Servlet TCKs
 - New 3.1 TCK

JAX-P TCKs
 - Updated 1.4 exclude list

JAX-RS TCKs
 - New 2.0 TCK

JMS TCKs
 - New 2.0 TCK
 - Updated 1.1 exclude list

JSF TCKs
 - Updated 2.1 TCK (two updates)

JPA TCKs
 - New 2.1 TCK

Enjoy.

Mark

Re: Requesting access to the OSGi TCK to test CXF-DOSGi

Felix Meschberger — 2013-02-13T19:56:48

Hi

The OSGi Alliance will soon provide us with a new agreement. It may take some time. I will get back to here once we have it.

Regards
Felix

Am 07.02.2013 um 18:49 schrieb Richard S. Hall:

Re: Requesting access to the OSGi TCK to test CXF-DOSGi

Felix Meschberger — 2013-02-08T15:43:31

As Richard pointed out our CT access license actually expired. But we are in the process of renewing it and just wait for it to be finalized and signed.

In any case I recorded your NDA and you will get access as soon as we have the license (again).

Sorry for the delay.

Regards
Felix

Am 07.02.2013 um 08:20 schrieb Christian Schneider:

Re: Requesting access to the OSGi TCK to test CXF-DOSGi

Richard S. Hall — 2013-02-07T17:49:56

Technically, we no longer have access to the OSGi CTs, since our 
agreement with the OSGi Alliance for access has expired. From what I 
understand, we are in the process of renewing the agreements.

-> richard

On 2/7/13 11:20 , Christian Schneider wrote:

Requesting access to the OSGi TCK to test CXF-DOSGi

Christian Schneider — 2013-02-07T16:20:59

Hi,

I would like to use the OSGi TCK to test CXF-DOSGi releases.

Best Regards

Christian

Re: Fwd: Your JCP NDA

Mark Thomas — 2013-01-25T20:12:49

Done.

It looks like your previous message was not delivered to the list.

Mark

Fwd: Your JCP NDA

Albert Lee — 2013-01-25T15:32:08

Any chance the request to the Sun JPA TCK svn repository can be authorized
soon?

If there is anything needed, please let me know.

Thanks,
Albert Lee.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Albert Lee <allee8285-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your JCP NDA
To: jcp-open-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org


Please authorize access to the Sun JPA TCK svn repository.

I have submitted the NDA and it has been acknowledged by the secretary.

Thanks,
Albert Lee.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Craig L Russell <clr-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:09 PM
Subject: Your JCP NDA
To: Albert Lee <allee8285-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org>
Cc: secretary-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org


Dear Albert Lee,

This message acknowledges receipt of your NDA, which has been filed in the
Apache Software Foundation records.

Warm Regards,

Re: Add OSGi Enterprise R5 CT

Richard S. Hall — 2013-01-23T18:03:54

Turns out, we have an issue here since our agreement with the OSGi 
Alliance for access to their CTs has expired on Dec 2, 2012. So, if we 
want to continue to have access we need to re-execute the agreement.

I think back in 2009 after some discussion, I signed and submitted the 
original agreement. I am no longer the PMC chair for Apache Felix, so 
we'd probably have to have Felix Meschberger sign it this time around 
(assuming that the org's position hasn't changed on the agreement).

-> richard

On 1/23/13 11:44 , Richard S. Hall wrote:

Re: Add OSGi Enterprise R5 CT

David Bosschaert — 2013-01-23T16:52:35

Hi Richard,

On 23 January 2013 16:44, Richard S. Hall <heavy-VT0ItBHXF8KdQnJuSAr7PQ< at >public.gmane.org> wrote:


If you could add them that would be great!

Many thanks,

David

Re: Add OSGi Enterprise R5 CT

Richard S. Hall — 2013-01-23T16:44:58

I think write access is limited. As far as I know, I still have write 
access, so I could add them.

-> richard

Add OSGi Enterprise R5 CT

David Bosschaert — 2013-01-23T15:04:52

Hi all,

I wanted to add the OSGi Enterprise R5 CT to the OSGi CT collection in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts

While I have read access to this repository, I don't seem have write access
to it. Could someone please give me write access, or alternatively add this
CT for me?

Thanks,

David

Re: Re: Need TCK for Apache Project

Kevin Sutter — 2013-01-10T23:22:02

Perfect!  Thank you, Mark.

I see the error of my ways...  I wasn't subscribed to the jcp-open mailing
list.  I was only using that e-mail address to request access.  Your first
reply went just to the jcp-open mailing list and, thus, I missed it.

Thanks again,
Kevin

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Mark Thomas <markt-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org> wrote:

Fwd: Need TCK for Apache Project

Kevan Miller — 2013-01-10T23:13:50


Begin forwarded message:

Fwd: Re: Need TCK for Apache Project

Mark Thomas — 2013-01-10T23:13:29

FWD as requested.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Need TCK for Apache Project
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:36:19 +0000
From: Mark Thomas <markt-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org>
Reply-To: jcp-open-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org
To: jcp-open-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A< at >public.gmane.org

On 07/01/2013 20:18, Kevin Sutter wrote:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/sun-tcks/persistence/2.0/

Done. Enjoy.

Mark